Shearergol

Jesus! That's like the dog telling the cat it's got a hairy arse. Are you on this forum just to take the piss, like you admitted on Toontastic? Fuck it, I'm not even lowering myself to your level. I'll leave you to it.

Does anyone on here actually respect the views of someone who thinks mackems.gif is an argument winner? NE5, I realise this will be followed by the extremely witty "toonspastic" comment, but I'll try anyway. Grow up a bit will ya. You might be the same age as Sam Allardyce, but my 4 year old niece is more mature. Back to the point though - if it were a choice between FS and KB then I think 99% of people would choose FS. It's a bit like asking someone if they want to be stabbed in the hand or stabbed in the eye though.

Average now but likely to turn out a good defender?

John Terry was Chelsea's player of the year when he was 21. I really don't understand where some people get the impression that he's only been good since he's been 23+. Exactly the same with Woodgate and Campbell. People need to understand that just attempting to re-write history doesn't make it the case. Taylor is a good centre back; but we've got better, and I trust Sam to replace him if he does go. However, I doubt anyone on here actually knows what he's being offered, so it's a bit of a pointless exercise until the club come out and say he's been transfer listed.

No, he's been offered more than that. Does anyone actually know? There's too many my nan's postman's brother stories in this thread. Don't you know? All you have to do is put the three letters ITK in your post and you can say Taylor has an ego, he's depriving surgeons of a living with his wages demands, and that he's the worst player ever to come through the academy Yep, everyone's said that. If you don't put ITK, does that mean you're allowed to make up what people are saying? You're missing my point. People put ITK then make stuff up as if its real, just as I did there. No one on here thinks he is a world beater, some people think he's a decent young centre half, then there's the clueless people who think he's a terrible defender, which he clearly isn't. The phrase that pisses me off most is "Bramble-esque", theres no comparison between the two at all. I don't really fancy reading the rest of this thread again, so could you post links to the posts which say he's a terrible defender please?

No, he's been offered more than that. Does anyone actually know? There's too many my nan's postman's brother stories in this thread. Don't you know? All you have to do is put the three letters ITK in your post and you can say Taylor has an ego, he's depriving surgeons of a living with his wages demands, and that he's the worst player ever to come through the academy Yep, everyone's said that. If you don't put ITK, does that mean you're allowed to make up what people are saying?

I can't actually remember his other goal. The 3rd goal was when Rob Lee was offside before setting Shearer up. I thought the 2nd was the freekick, but can't recall the first. D'oh

That was his 2nd.

How does he manage to live on a poxy 9k a week? My heart bleeds!!!!!!!! w@nker! Ignorant post tbh Ignorant? how exactly? I know players earn much much more but nobody on the planet deserves 9k a week for kicking a ball about. People who do important things like heart transplants earn far far less! So why target Taylor??? Cos i have had a few beers I logged on and this thread was the first one i read! simple really! you have a problem with that? Well do us a favour and log back off then. Or alternatively answer the question, why target Taylor over the fact that the majority of Premier League footballers earn more than surgeons. As I said before, an ignorant post Perhaps the title of the thread was the reason he mentioned Taylor? Just a thought like...

Offense? I think it's safe to say that anything involving Emre will be s*** though. bollocks tbh Ok, you've convinced me. that was easy I had no comeback tbh. I could of course turn it into a debate which will end up with someone saying "Parker was to blame for Emre being completely ineffectual in all but 4 of his games for us" but I'll leave it for another day. Anyone got a theory of why we can't actually score at home?

Offense? I think it's safe to say that anything involving Emre will be s*** though. bollocks tbh Ok, you've convinced me.

Offense? I think it's safe to say that anything involving Emre will be shit though.

Martins has gone off, with Owen coming on, I hear

Sounds like Milner is having a good game, but that's about it.

How long have you known Owen? I'd be interested in other things he's told you about his commitment to the club? No shit with your last comment by the way. "Either play well for us or go". Isn't that what you apply to every single one of the players, or is it just because Owen has shagged your girlfriend or something?

Solano, Smith, Viduka

Was it the goal when the ball was on the corner of the box and he overhead kicked it into the opposite corner and the goalie just stood still? probably a different goal i saw. Nope. The striker just volleyed it as hard as he could as it dropped, out of sheer frustration and it happened to arrow into the top corner from about 30 yards. No skill - just sheer luck tbh. I think most long range goals are tbh, when people watch players like Lampard or whoever hit them from 25-30 yards and it flys in the top corner, it's more clever play than skill, it's almost impossible to hit the ball that accurate so they play the percentages as their body shape won't be perfect. You've never played the game then, right?

Liverpool trying to buy the title. Interesting. Bet they don't get as much stick as Chelsea despite outspending them by a mile.

We are still talking about money, dosn't change alot does it? Or the principle of your business owning your own right to market yourself? Chelsea could offer him £250k a week and he'd still have an issue with the image rights.

Chelsea want to retain 100% of his image rights. He doesn't think they should. It's NOTHING to do with the salary, it's all about the ownership of the image rights. They'll have the same problem with John Terry soon.

They have branches here in Scunthorpe though. They were actually second choice for sponsors though - Tata Steel (Corus) ended up pulling out at the last minute. Oh, and for those of you slating Adidas kits, you should try Carlotti. Fucking appauling.

David Nugent 1, Wayne Rooney 0. That how it works? It would work like that if the world and his wife had been saying that David Nugent's - and the team as a whole - performances had been suffering because of the presence of Rooney, and Nugents performance tonight - rescuing the team from another s**** result because he had been given a platform due to the absense of Rooney - had vindicated those opinions. As far as I am aware, unlike Lampard vs Gerrard, none of those things are true, so, no You're taking the piss right? You're saying that Gerrard actually performed because Lampard wasn't playing? Does it occur to you that maybe if both of them had played in the centre, which was the original plan, that the result would still have been the same? No need for Gerrard to sit deep, no need for him to play wide. Please tell me you're saying England won because Lampard didn't play. I'd love that

David Nugent 1, Wayne Rooney 0. That how it works?

Who?

Gerrard again.