Jump to content

Zero

Member
  • Posts

    6,581
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Zero

  1. In short The club wants the fans to turn on BZG instead of Ashley And we all know what the real answer is.
  2. Zero

    Sean Longstaff

    Which is good. We need relegation
  3. He did already. There was no bid on the table.
  4. Well.....just my wild guess, but it won’t far off imo: 1. BZG proposed a bid, the Fat cunt said fine go ahead for the rest of the process 2. BZG preparing other stuff e.g. the proper test 3. One day the fat cunt told BZG that the goal post has been moved and it’s up to them to revise the bid 4. BZG told the fat cunt that they won’t change the bid That’s why BZG said there is a bid on the table whilst the fat cunt said no. Consistent with his personality as well
  5. And I think what the club source means is there is no bid that Ashley would accept that is on the table. I.e. the BZG offer was rejected.
  6. I want him to be our manager. I am serious. That would certainly confirm the relegation and that’s the only way we can get rid of the fat cunt.
  7. Interesting. No bids on the table. So what the hell was that statement confirmed by the club?
  8. As if BZG have any say in the matter. Yea they would just quit.
  9. It could feasibly happen on the last day or two of the transfer window with a couple of massive Robinho @ Man City style marquee signings to carry the team to the next window where the we'll really unzip the fly and let rip. Man City got a manager. We don’t. No decent one will want to come and join this disaster now.
  10. If the takeover is going to happen, it should be within the next 48 hours. Just think if you are BZG, you won’t risk your investment like this I.e. start the season without enough time for all kinds of preparations I think it won’t happen now.
  11. If that’s the case he should get more credit for fucking over Ashley by playing him till the last moment. Well done.
  12. It would be an “easy out” to Ashley if he can still sell to BZG now. I mean I can’t imagine how can the club survive this season if it’s still under Ashley.
  13. Normally we won’t state “NUFC agreed” if it’s release clause case. It should be “Leicester agreed”. Further proof that the clause is utter bollocks.
  14. To be fair if I am Perez I would go Leicester too. Takeover or not, the new manager would likely get his own people and Perez may not be in the starting lineup anymore. At Leicester at least I am guaranteed to have a place under Rodgers.
  15. If a sale has been agreed, the club would likely be restricted from making any decisions on material asset sales (if there is a decision to be made) without the consent of the acquirer. The cash would remain in the target business or otherwise the price would be adjusted. In another words, if there would be a takeover, BZG has also approved the sale of Perez (if there was no release clause)
  16. Pretty sure Rafa staying was Ashley’s top priority, over everything else. That’s why he needed to take revenge that way. Takeover was never his top priority. At least not at this price selling to BZG. Takeover or not, we need to thanks Rafa for not bowing down to Ashley which makes us a step closer to being sold. In other words, we would not be sold if Rafa stayed
  17. Excellent business for Leicester. Basically the only replacement for Okazaki in the market. 30m was a bit expensive but not unreasonable. Good bye sweet prince. I know you will do very well there. Sadly this means the takeover was over. No way BZG would allow this to go through before the takeover. The release clause sounds fishy to me.
  18. Okay, hope I can contribute something for you guys, as someone who lives near China First of all, I genuinely don’t blame Rafa to go China because he didn’t have much options left, and that’s due to us. There were a huge lot of interests back in April, like Roma, but Rafa turned them all down till the end of June, because he wanted to stay with us. And secondly, China is a very complicated market in relation to football. There are a lot of hidden terms and rules that are not disclosed to the public. For example, a lot of managers contract has a release clause that, if the manager has lost three games in a row, the club can sack him immediately without any compensation paid. In addition to that, there are a lot of requests from owners and even the govern bodies, and there’s basically no such thing as control of transfer. One recent example is most of the national team players are forced to transfer to Evergrande for a pre-determined fees set by the government, in order for “better preparation for World Cup 2022”. This ridiculous order had forced the reigning league champion to sell their MVP Wu Lei to Espanyol last January in order to prevent financial loss. I think Rafa has been badly advised for this move. I ain’t disappointed, I just feel sorry to this legend that he had to make this move because he wanted to stay with us, the real fans who really care for the club. He won’t last in China for long. Worst fit imo. He would be back to Europe within one year.
  19. No chance it states something like “takeover completed” lol
  20. Certainly it’s just bollocks as usual. However, it’s a bad lie. This will further discourages potential candidates and even Ashley would know the available ones would relegate the club without doubt. I smell frustrations. Rafa leaving was not Ashley’s original plan.
  21. He should never be sold. The move to Young Boys should only be a loan.
  22. Which part of the story are you saying doesn’t tie with their statement? Are you talking about the PA news thing from yesterday saying there are no ongoing owner and director tests by the FA? This one and the “price has been agreed”. You may call me naive but the first statement by BZG was saying something like the deal was close to completion that 1. Price has been agreed (with Ashley signature) 2. Proof of funds provided 3. Awaiting the proper test Now if this is real, then what can Ashley do to hold up the deal other then refusing to sign the last paper? Ok fine I can give the benefit of the doubt to BZG as Ashley is a real cunt. But now if FA comes out and say there was no proper test carrying out, then you should wonder how credible was the first statement. Another scenario could be BZG simply called off the process.
  23. To be honest I ain’t sure it’s Ashley side who holds up the deal. I mean, I am now suspecting the credibility of BZG as the story now definitely does not tie with their statement issued a few weeks ago. Of course history taught us Ashley is most likely the core problem but BZG now looks dodgy to me as well. Ashley is going to have a hard time if BZGs offer is fake and Rafa now gone.
  24. I think it’s a bad news to Ashley, surprisingly
  25. X don’t have the funds O not willing to entertain Ashley’s bullshit requirement I always wonder what the “term / price agreed” back in the first statement issued by BZG. Base on latest developments no way the terms or the price have been agreed
×
×
  • Create New...