Teasy

So you didn't see our 2:1 win over Liverpool then?.. As for Bellamy vs Martins.. well I like Martins and have defended him in the past, but at the moment he's certainly not on the same level as Bellamy was for us. He's scored more goals, but his performances have been nowhere near as good. Bellamy consistently inspired our team when he was here (well consistently when he was fit anyway ).

I thought it was well known the sort of ridiculous wage Dyer is on. What he means is its been rumoured to be £80,000 and now all of a sudden its "over £80,000". Soon it'll be £90,000, its paper talk, chinese whispers. I bet he's on no more then £65,000, if that, he was on £55,000-£60,000 before his last injury if I remember correctly. Wy on earth would we give someone with anextremely serious injury who may never play at his best again, if at all, a £30,000 pay rise? Fred may be a lot of things but he's not a complete idiot financially. To the topic at hand, I've always been a bit of a fan of Dyer when he's played, but considering his problems and his age I'd probably be happy to get our initial fee back for him.

Sky Plus only costs £10 if you don't have at least two premium channels (Sky Sports 1/2, or two movies channels ect). Surely you must have at least two premium channels to be paying that kind of money.

Are you really going to be one of those c***s that would say "Man UTD" or "Chelsea" ect? I'd rather stab myself in the eyes then claim to support anyone other then Newcastle. But failing that I'd simply say "since Newcastle went under I don't support any team". Appart from England maybe, if I could bare to watch Football at all.

Im 22 though and like you said everyone has his opinion on things so the fact that you dont agree with my opinion doesnt mean im wrong Lets bear in mind that in the past few seasons, Martin O'Neill, Sam Alladyce, Alan Curbishly and Steve Bruce have all (allegedly) turned down the Newcastle position, so it's not as if the cream of European management are clammering for the position. Given, that, who would you want that would actually take the job? I don't think its even alleged that Bruce and Curbishly turned doen the job... Bruce came out and said he'd been desperate for the job before Roeder got it.

Yes and we did better when he only had 11 players (more like 14/15 in reality) to choose from.. The mans a menace when he has options!

Not at all, had we won today we'd be two points off European qualification with a much easier final four games then Portsmouth. Our season is certainly over now though..

A toss of a coin gives you a 50/50 chance, Roeder gives you no chance, its an easy decision IMO..

How much do you think he's on? £50,000 to £60,000 would have been my guess.

I always ask this question and never get an answer. Where is the actual propf that Dyer gets paid £80,000 a week? Because until I see some good sources for this I'm going to keep assuming its nothing but exagerated paper talk.

you do realise i was being sarcastic? as the person prior to my post said we've got no chance. I didn't realise that no, in that case I agree with you

No. One is Portsmouth vs Newcastle. Hell of a difference. As I said catching them is a matter of two games (6 points) one of which involves Newcastle vs Portsmouth....

Sorry did he say "there could be no chance in hell"? In a week we could be 12 points behind, or we could be 3, or even 0 behind. Point being there's hardly "no chance in hell".. Its a matter of two games, one of which involves Newcastle vs Portsmouth.

We're six points behind Portsmouth and play them just under a week from now. We may not catch them, but its hardly impossible.

Am I really seeing people praising Domi here?!.. talk about rose tinted glasses.. Domi was an ok defender and good going forward but he was far to weak and casual to be a good Premiership defender. Remember the FA cup final?..

Parker on £60,000, Dyer on £80,000, Owen on £115,000, why do some people believe this silly paper talk?

I think this thread should be removed. Or everyone who reads it should be made to touch wood..

But we don't need to beat you tonight to go through. Also out of the 28 European home results you posted only 9 of them would be good enough to send you through tonight. Six of those results were 25 years ago or more.. So really to go through tonight you need to do what you've only done three times in the last 25 years. Against arguably the best team you've played in that time. Just thought I'd add some perspective to your stats.

What a load of absolute s*** you talk. Sometimes his control is off, not all the time and while his decision making can be unpredictable its far from terrible. On the plus side he's extremely quick, very strong, is a good finisher with both feet, has a super powerful shot and has some good flair (flicks and tricks). But apparently you can't see any positives, he must have just fluked his 16 goals so far.. dear me this kind of s*** really makes me sick. f*** off. im entitled to an opinion as much as you. and i can see some positives - try his 16 goals so far this season. I didn't stop you from having your opinion, I just think its complete s***. Also I was talking about positive attributes, not a goal scoring record. Which I might add you think is so positive that you completely devalue it by saying "he's the worst player to ever score 16 goals". I'm sure nobody here thinks Martins is perfect, far from it at this stage in his carear. But to be so utterly negative towards him is just unreal, are you just on a windup or what? The guy has just scored 2 goals for us, had an excellent game and you rip into him as if he's a peice of s*** (plenty of fairly average strikers have scored 16 goals in a season over the years in case you didn't realise..). You don't have a single good thing to say about him as a player... I think that's utterly bizarre..

What a load of absolute s*** you talk. Sometimes his control is off, not all the time and while his decision making can be unpredictable its far from terrible. On the plus side he's extremely quick, very strong, is a good finisher with both feet, has a super powerful shot and has some good flair (flicks and tricks). But apparently you can't see any positives, he must have just fluked his 16 goals so far.. dear me this kind of s*** really makes me sick.

Hopefully if that happens HTT Roeder will be tied to Luque at the time...

Ok for the pedantic among us, it looks like his muscle has been replaced by fat.. ok Anon?

Doesn't look like he's gained that much actual weight to me. Just looks like his muscle has turned to fat, which is anything but a good thing..

Duff has played nearly three times as much Football as Luque, yet he's scored/created less goals... Can't say that makes him the better bet to be honest. IMO he's been the worst player at the club so far this season considering the chances he's had and what he's produced.

What the f*** are you?.. I don't know what you are..