Jump to content

Rich

Administrator
  • Posts

    36,158
  • Joined

Everything posted by Rich

  1. Not to make this all about FFP again, but even if the Swiss Ramble stuff was 100% bang-on it doesn't mean there's "only" £41M left to spend in this window.
  2. Gallagher on a permanent, Pulisic or CHO on loan to buy, and João Pedro on a permanent would be a mint end to the window, mind.
  3. A little roundup of the strongest recent links or older bids we know definitely happened for players that still haven't moved, sorted in order of current probability of happening: CM/AM: Gallagher, Paqueta, Maddison RW/LW: Pulisic, Hudson-Odoi, Harrison, Barnes, Gordon ST: João Pedro, Ramos, Broja Anything missed? If we get one from each pool, we're laughing.
  4. Looks like Aubameyang to Chelsea is on and fairly imminent. Should speed things up on Broja.
  5. Rich

    João Pedro

    This is sort of where I'm at now like . Feels like it will be soon™. Still three in before the window shuts, I reckon.
  6. Rich

    João Pedro

    They've just been relegated, they've got next to no leverage.
  7. Rich

    João Pedro

    Slim runs about four hours behind the rest of the world these days, like.
  8. That's great to hear, good luck with writing it all up!
  9. Nah, still think he has a big role to play. Along with Miggy, he's always been the biggest weakness on the "strongest XI" teamsheet for this year, though.
  10. Think this was always the case, tbh. Joelinton and Bruno are nailed-on, and Shelvey was probably ahead of Willock before his injury.
  11. A fair few journalists have said we've asked to be kept informed on Broja, Pulisic, Hudson-Odoi, and Gallagher from Chelsea.
  12. Re: Martin Hardy in The Times saying a move for Gallagher is "progressing". Based on everything I've read about / listened to on Chelsea lately, they aren't willing to loan him out again unless it's a deal with a guaranteed purchase at the end of it. Assume that's what we'll be working on, if true.
  13. Why would Chelsea do that deal, though?
  14. I'll make one for your mam.
  15. He clarified that two Tweets down. How does that make a news story?
  16. Rich

    The Coaching Staff

    The fact they're advertising it so publicly points to the fact that it wasn't planned, but no idea what the story is behind him leaving.
  17. They look trash but they broke at least one of our signings in Jan, if I remember rightly.
  18. Rich

    João Pedro

    You just have to brush it off. Dementors gonna dement.
  19. Rich

    The Coaching Staff

    Advert for new Head of GK coaching now on the website too.
  20. Ah, it would be the same aye.
  21. Rich

    João Pedro

    I'd always take that approach, too, because when it does come off, as with Trippier, Bruno, and hopefully Botman, we'll be laughing. While we'll still all be happy enough if the others we bring in improve us as much as Burn and Targett did and continue to do.
  22. No, never. The data itself would tell you whether a player was in form or not, as you could look at similar instances for Torres ~2/3 years prior where he'd probably be outscoring his xG in most situations. His regression was quite easy to see in the data. We would also produce match reports on hundreds of games a weekend where this sort of stuff would be discussed, to add some context to everything like you just did above.
  23. Aye that was always a really tricky situation, because you're getting into the realms of player positioning and anticipation, which is a nightmare to quantify. If the player got close enough (again subjective) then it might be assigned a score. Our approach towards the end of my time was to start grading chance-creating passes like the one you mention as their own significant action, and trying to apply that as a weighting on a final xG score, and it also had the handy effect of allowing us to better judge the value of creative players who don't necessarily score many themselves.
×
×
  • Create New...