Mick

http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,57722.msg1568850.html#msg1568850

I think.

Having been reminded of who said what I'll stand by what I've said but I'll not go beyond that.

I heard he was shit stirring but can't remember where that came from.

How do you know that?

He'd have no option if Nolan told him to do it.

Hughton has another year left on his contract.

Look up. http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,68522.msg2269128.html#msg2269128

I'll miss the lack of hype about this division, everything seems less cluttered and less fussy and a bit like listening to an unplugged version of music.

You might be able to get it to think that you're not in the UK although I would never recommend that, obviously.

Becoming lazy would say more about the player than the level he was playing at, I would prefer to see kids given a chance in a good team than poor one. It's not only about them developing as players it's also about becoming familiar with the players around them and the team they play for. Our kids would have learned as much playing here as they would anywhere else. It’s not just about playing a good game it's about being comfortable in the team and where you play. Some players are great for one team and then move on and fail to produce because they don’t settle or the team plays a different game to the one which they were used to.

You can learn as much playing for a good team as a bad one, sometimes a lot more as you have time to develop as you’re not always under pressure.

If great minds can think alike, I guess the opposite is also true.

Kadar and Ranger have both been given professional games and let nobody down, we know what they can do.

Sheffield is almost walking distance.

That depends on whether he has missed a comma or not.

I've gone for West Ham and Bolton but would have preferred Blackburn to go than either of those because of Allardyce. It would be even better though if we stay up next season and play a part in putting them down.

That doesn't make sense if it's preventing Kadar from playing for us while we have a player in on loan, Kadar was our player and in need of games, especially at this level. If bringing in Van Aanholt meant that he had to play and that Kadar couldn't because of that then Van Aanholt shouldn't have been brought in.

I know I mentioned Hall before but I wouldn't mind keeping him as cover, it would make sense as he seems to have settled in well and hasn't done anything wrong when played.

We had one in Kadar so didn't need to bring one in, we should have been giving him games.

I hope that we do that and we could because if Steve Taylor stays he'll be needed at right back more than central defence.

You're saying that we couldn't play Kadar because he may have been injured, that doesn't make sense and could apply to any player in our team.

I know we sent Lua Lua out on loan and that he was injured earlier in the season and has been but is no longer injured at Brighton. That wouldn't have prevented him getting more games here when almost everybody was saying that we needed Guthrie in the centre and which has since been proven to be right. As for Van Aanholt possibly not being available later, he's not the only left back, why did it have to be him and not somebody else as cover?

The trouble with that is that he could become home sick, he had settled in so keeping him would make more sense as long as he's getting games.

I agree that he's done OK but I don't think he has done any better than Kadar would have done.