Mick

If every other owner of this club had taken nothing out and thrown in £30 million a year we would be the third richest club in the league.

Have you got a link to an article with quotes? I'm not bothered if you haven't but I have either forgotten about it or didn't see it.

The fact that he didn't do due dilligence is something he's had to pay for, not us. He's done that while keeping the club paying bills when due, in other words, he's ensured that the club is solvent.

He did read the accounts before buying the club, he didn't do due dilligence. The only surprise was the sponsorship money having been spent and having to pay the loan off early. Ashley knew about £70 million of debt before buying the club.

I didn't ask what it would achieve, you haven't understood what I was asking. I was asking what the desired outcome was. The question wasn't me having a go, I was interested what the goals were.

I might be wrong but I'm sure he said that he would put the money in, I can't remember him saying that it was specifically for transfers.

The accounts also had a note mentioning that he'd put a further £10 million in.

Did you see the accounts? He actually put £30 million in just to keep our heads above water. He may have taken money out since those accounts but we have no proof of that.

Is that the best you can come up with? I thought you would at least have answered.

The only thing I can see on your list is a lack of communication, the others just aren't true although lack of ambition is a possibility.

What is the desired outcome of the protest?

I agree with most of that but it's not what I hear from NUSC unless that was on the stream tonight. They seem to have a single goal and that is to get rid of Ashley while he isn't the problem, the state of the club is. He has played a part in our current state but so have others, what we need is for somebody to sort it out and it doesn't matter who that person is or persons are.

If NUSC want the club to communicate then maybe they need to do something different to make that happen.

I'm going for 0-2 to us, I'm due a correct prediction.

I'm not sure if he was haggling over more money, I seem to remember that he was quite settled up here at the time and when he left I was a bit shocked.

He wanted to leave.

I thought that Troisi had a bit of class in his game but he didn't work hard and I think that probably went against him here, Keegan musn't have liked him.

I think he had special boots made because of his legs being different lengths, he had a minor disability but he was much better than most we've had since he left.

Darren Peacock wasn't terrible, he didn't start too well but improved and I wasn't happy to see him leave.

It's part of a crane.

The people who had just arrived at the club, probably with the help of Russell Cushing, very few people walk into a new business and start to make changes from day 1.

I doubt he'll even come off the bench and if he does it will only be for the last 10 minutes.

I think it's possible that he would stay, even if Man U were after him.

I'd start LuaLua in this game instead of Duff because he has pace and has the bottle to take the ball up and put a cross in.

I've criticised this transfer window, how is that a whitewash? Unlike you, I'll not try to make out that everything they do is bad but when I think it is I'll say so.