healthyaddiction

That really doesn't conflict with what KaKa posted does it. "the conditions would have to be ideal, as well as it needing to be a player we want long term". We wanted Hall long term and had an obligation to sign him built in.

He's got 3.5 years on his contract. We're a long way from losing him for free.

You can't play against your parent club anymore. Haven't been able to since Lua-Lua.

It's reported as an obligation.

Selling Kelly for £20m will allow us to spend £20m. In our PSR situation it's that simple.

People keep saying this but always forget that would require us to sell another £30 million worth of player each year to balance that new signing out. Everyone seems to know the fee is amortised in the first year and forget it has to be included every year going forward.

Interesting thing I got about that is that Arsenal fans have gone on about Isak growing up supporting Arsenal, but he says in the video he only watched Spanish football growing up.

Fools. If they'd moved faster they could have had Miggy for 65m. Their loss I guess.

Junior Firpo is out long term I think.

Just seen a Liverpool youth got red carded 4 minutes into his professional debut. Hell of a way to start your career.

They've already commited £60m to sign Zubimendi right? They're not going to spend an additional £150m on top of that to get Isak. Especially as they likely want a left sided forward too.

I've never watched a single second of him. He's clearly shite, you've overpaid and he's really a right sided forward. He's probably been signed to replace Amad.

I think he means specifically at LWB, as, according to Transfermarkt, he's been played in a lot of positions. Only around half of them have been at LB/LWB.

Probably planning to catch a flight with Botman as he finally get's his dream move to AC Milan.