Alberto2005

SWP who moved from Title challengers and Champions league side Chelsea to mid-table Newcastle United with the potential of getting into europe in the coming years. Aye, you're probably right. If the money's there, Keegan probably won't give SWP - in and out the team at Chelsea, and arguably the most promising English youngster he produced - a second thought. What's rattling your cage tonight? Nothing Maybe my posts sound pissed off without smilies, they aren't intended to

Oh aye, that would give him even more of a legend status than he already has if you could find ANOTHER Sibierski, fucking hell yes, another Sibierski... who'd of thought it, all my dreams are coming true at once.

SWP who moved from Title challengers and Champions league side Chelsea to mid-table Newcastle United with the potential of getting into europe in the coming years.

Tight or what, give him 100m

1:16 am.

Sven did a lot better than Keegan for England tbf.

He failed at a number of jobs, based on effectively cracking and walking away. Its just the way things are. Plenty of people would argue against that, and state other reasons for his departures. If nowt else, least he has the decency to resign, rather than hanging on for a pay-off. Maybe the pressure was too much to carry on?

Jesus Christ

Finished slurping Luque's bell end? Well it was either that or wanking 5 times in half an hour over a 56 year old.

Yeh.. bet he's shitting it

"Cherry on top of the pie"

Give him 100m.

I'm feeling weird, is it good? Is it bad? I honestly don't know.

Not sure what to think.

Who is going to get it though? Shearer has been ruled out, Houllier has been ruled out, there isn't many candidates.

Bored of this now

He's an idiot.

omg. Oh...

I think they'll appoint Shepherd, it's all been a cunning plan by Ashley,Mort and Shepherd to sink the club once and for all.

Wootusilonpolusheetinghellman!

Never have to say im pretty surprised as well tbh. i reckon, out of those meantioned relaistically, there is more support for deschamps than anyone else I wonder if the votes would be different if one wasn't more linked than the other, people could have voted on the fact Deschamps is much more likely to come.

Never

Lol.

Aye, I'm surprised at such goodwill towards him tbh. Not to say he isn't good (I have no idea), but he's done nothing compared to Houllier, for example. A foreign Hughes? Yes, Deschamps is the same age as Houllier and has had the same amount of time to make an impact Where did I say that? I'm talking about the difference in response by people on here. Houllier with all his achievements got nothing like this enthusiasm. Maybe because the teams he has worked under haven't played the attractive football the people on here are looking for. Maybe so. I've never really seen it, as I admitted above. What kind of style do his teams generally play? Other than with Juventus in a lower league. Attacking, you saw that throughout the Champions League campaign, the wins over Real Madrid and Chelsea were very good games and Monaco took the game to both of them, Morientes and Giuly were influential in their success and I'm sure everyone remembers the 8-3 win over Deportivo La Coruna, players such as Morientes, Giuly and Rothen were the main attacking players in their team, the point is the intent was to play good football and attack teams. So do people prefer the promise of good football over a proven winner? Both in an ideal world, it's difficult to compare, both have managed under different circumstances, it depends on whether Ashley sees it as too much of a risk.