2sheds

12 years

My mistake to judge anyone by their emotional maturity on a messageboard

I hope you like puberty when it hits you in ten years or so.

I fail to see why Shay is villified when Shearer caused a hell of a lot more damage to the is club in his last 5 years. Like extending his contract for the crappiest manager we've had this century after being instrumental in getting rid of our best. Yeah let's all hate Shay

And got rid of any manager who dropped him

Indeed. That would include Shearer would it? He scored less goals than Shay saved yet his wages were considerably higher. Oh but Big Al is a hero isn't he?

I have a great deal of difficulty in believing that any of the dickheads on this forum who slag Shay off for any excuse were even born when he first signed for us.

It's part and parcel of the game that every club promotes themselves by referring to former great players.

In Collymore's defence not EVERYTHING he has done since quitting playing has been rubbish. That time he threatened to lamp Vanilla Ice on the farm was canny, particularly since the yank shit his pants.

Yeah? 1969 I hope they wither and die the sooner the better thanks but a hope you die first Well you don't know me at all and I've never went to Glasgow and smashed half the place and it's population up. But I suppose it's easier to hate an individual rather than a bigotted organisation. so you know me and ive smashed up glasgow and half the population have i? No rangers have dickhead. In 1969. Hence that's why I specifically mentioned that year so you hope we die for something a minority done 40 years ago before thousands of us were born then? And he has the nerve to call others bigotted. That's a bit rich coming from you, AKA 'blame the catholics'

Yeah? 1969 I hope they wither and die the sooner the better thanks but a hope you die first Well you don't know me at all and I've never went to Glasgow and smashed half the place and it's population up. But I suppose it's easier to hate an individual rather than a bigotted organisation. so you know me and ive smashed up glasgow and half the population have i? No rangers have dickhead. In 1969. Hence that's why I specifically mentioned that year so you hope we die for something a minority done 40 years ago before thousands of us were born then? No I hope the club dies not you personally. Which is the opposite of what you wrote

Yeah? 1969 I hope they wither and die the sooner the better thanks but a hope you die first Well you don't know me at all and I've never went to Glasgow and smashed half the place and it's population up. But I suppose it's easier to hate an individual rather than a bigotted organisation. so you know me and ive smashed up glasgow and half the population have i? No rangers have dickhead. In 1969. Hence that's why I specifically mentioned that year

Yeah? 1969 I hope they wither and die the sooner the better thanks but a hope you die first Well you don't know me at all and I've never went to Glasgow and smashed half the place and it's population up. But I suppose it's easier to hate an individual rather than a bigotted organisation.

Yeah? 1969 I hope they wither and die the sooner the better

Fuck Rangers fans

I'd give him a Paddington Bear 'hard stare'

From the same link To sum up - the article contradicts itself and it's typical daily mail shite. Why people read this trash is beyond me the sport has more truth in it

Wait, am I getting this right, the reason Shearer isn't out manager is because he (Shearer) f***ed off at the end of last season? Or do you mean he had a meeting with Ashley and laid out his plans.. that scared the s*** out of Ashley. We could debate that perhaps, were Shearer's demands excessive? Given the clubs track record with verifiable statements I wouldn't expect many to believe the tales of extravagent demands. Given the fact I've never met Ashley or implied it I'd say your post was a pile of s***. Not sure how you read that into my post, I never implied anything but especially not that you'd met Ashley. We do know Shearer and Ashley met though, and there was talk (papertalk?) afterwards that Shearers wage demands were high and/or the transfer kitty he wanted was excessive. I'm trying to understand your statement re 'Shearer f***ing off at the end of the season'. It seems an extreme statement, given that, as far as we know, he wasn't even offered the job. Unless you're implying his demands effectively ruled him out of the job. Save your breath mate, there's no point trying to have a rational debate with Mr 2sheds. He's either a WUM or an idiot, and not worth the bother! Says the man who said the players took the piss before Shearer arrived last season, apparently didn't think they did in that last shitty 45 mins of premiership football http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,61053.3570.html

It's good from the point of view we need someone in the managers chair. It's good from the point of view that it should bring some much needed stability. It's good that Hughton gets at least until the end of the season to prove himself. It's bad that the job hasn't gone to Mourinho/Hitzfeld/Sven etc etc etc but that's called being realistic. FWIW Ashleys is a sack of s***. Is that clearer for you? So Hughton gets until the end of the season to prove himself but Shearer can be written off as being **** after eight games? I am indeed having difficulty comprehending this. Now why are you bringing Shearer up? Your approach to judging the respective managers just seems really strange. One is given a full season (and pre-season to prove himself) while the other only got a handful of games. Or to put it another way one willingly stays at the club despite the uncertainty of his position while the other one f***s back off to MOTD. Our last 45 mins of football under Shearer is the most gutless performance I've seen from any Newcastle team - and I've seen us relegated 3 times. How's it Shearer's fault he has to go back to MOTD? I'm sure if Ashley offered him a contract he'd probably take it (although I'm less sure about this now) and if Ashley offered him a contract back at the start of June he'd have bitten his hands off. I don't disagree with the second bit though, although it's not really that great a reason not to give Shearer a second chance (not alone anyway). If you're going to judge Shearer on those eight games you should judge Hughton on his first eight games which were equally as bad (or at least very close to being as bad, despite being under less pressure and arguably having easier games). Hughton has apparently just been offered a managers contract, are you saying he should have f***ed off like Shearer at the end of last season? No? Hughton was under contract as a coach and took over as caretaker, Shearer had a contract for eight games which expired at the end of the season and Ashley seemingly didn't want to give him a contract. I don't see what Shearer was supposed to do? He clearly wanted the job and didn't want to run off. But he did. While Hughton stayed. Which of the two has done the most for us this season?

Wait, am I getting this right, the reason Shearer isn't out manager is because he (Shearer) f***ed off at the end of last season? Or do you mean he had a meeting with Ashley and laid out his plans.. that scared the s*** out of Ashley. We could debate that perhaps, were Shearer's demands excessive? Given the clubs track record with verifiable statements I wouldn't expect many to believe the tales of extravagent demands. Given the fact I've never met Ashley or implied it I'd say your post was a pile of s***.

It's good from the point of view we need someone in the managers chair. It's good from the point of view that it should bring some much needed stability. It's good that Hughton gets at least until the end of the season to prove himself. It's bad that the job hasn't gone to Mourinho/Hitzfeld/Sven etc etc etc but that's called being realistic. FWIW Ashleys is a sack of s***. Is that clearer for you? So Hughton gets until the end of the season to prove himself but Shearer can be written off as being **** after eight games? I am indeed having difficulty comprehending this. Now why are you bringing Shearer up? Your approach to judging the respective managers just seems really strange. One is given a full season (and pre-season to prove himself) while the other only got a handful of games. Or to put it another way one willingly stays at the club despite the uncertainty of his position while the other one f***s back off to MOTD. Our last 45 mins of football under Shearer is the most gutless performance I've seen from any Newcastle team - and I've seen us relegated 3 times. How's it Shearer's fault he has to go back to MOTD? I'm sure if Ashley offered him a contract he'd probably take it (although I'm less sure about this now) and if Ashley offered him a contract back at the start of June he'd have bitten his hands off. I don't disagree with the second bit though, although it's not really that great a reason not to give Shearer a second chance (not alone anyway). If you're going to judge Shearer on those eight games you should judge Hughton on his first eight games which were equally as bad (or at least very close to being as bad, despite being under less pressure and arguably having easier games). Hughton has apparently just been offered a managers contract, are you saying he should have fucked off like Shearer at the end of last season?

It's good from the point of view we need someone in the managers chair. It's good from the point of view that it should bring some much needed stability. It's good that Hughton gets at least until the end of the season to prove himself. It's bad that the job hasn't gone to Mourinho/Hitzfeld/Sven etc etc etc but that's called being realistic. FWIW Ashleys is a sack of s***. Is that clearer for you? So Hughton gets until the end of the season to prove himself but Shearer can be written off as being **** after eight games? I am indeed having difficulty comprehending this. Now why are you bringing Shearer up? Your approach to judging the respective managers just seems really strange. One is given a full season (and pre-season to prove himself) while the other only got a handful of games. Or to put it another way one willingly stays at the club despite the uncertainty of his position while the other one fucks back off to MOTD. Our last 45 mins of football under Shearer is the most gutless performance I've seen from any Newcastle team - and I've seen us relegated 3 times.

It's good from the point of view we need someone in the managers chair. It's good from the point of view that it should bring some much needed stability. It's good that Hughton gets at least until the end of the season to prove himself. It's bad that the job hasn't gone to Mourinho/Hitzfeld/Sven etc etc etc but that's called being realistic. FWIW Ashleys is a sack of s***. Is that clearer for you? So Hughton gets until the end of the season to prove himself but Shearer can be written off as being **** after eight games? I am indeed having difficulty comprehending this. Now why are you bringing Shearer up?

Frazzle wrote: Aaah now it just 'looks like' I was defending the decision. Like I said comprehension isn't your strong point. Sacking Robson was the worst decision this club has made since I started going to matches (mid 70s) Nothing comes close to a disaster of such epic proportions, certainly not this news. On the grand scale of NUFC fuck ups this is on a par with signing Rush and Barnes up to play in our first team - nothing more. It's good from the point of view we need someone in the managers chair. It's good from the point of view that it should bring some much needed stability. It's good that Hughton gets at least until the end of the season to prove himself. It's bad that the job hasn't gone to Mourinho/Hitzfeld/Sven etc etc etc but that's called being realistic. FWIW Ashleys is a sack of shit. Is that clearer for you?