Ronaldo

Williamson is the slowest of the three and the weakest by a distance on the deck. He's a good squad player, but shouldn't really be in contention for a place in the starting Xl with everyone fit.

What? colocini is still a premiership flop So's Taylor. And how on earth does 'pase' and fitness count in his favour when considering a partner for Campbell? Taylor is slow and unfit. soo's taylor hmmm, nope wrong their. Taylor has been playing for 5 seasons and is regularly linked with other premiership clubs. Colocini cost 10M and made a number of errors which in part led to us being relegated Regularly linked with other clubs? And no offers. What on earth does that have to do with it anyway?

Guthrie will get murdered in that role, but quite a decent team.

What? colocini is still a premiership flop So's Taylor. And how on earth does 'pase' and fitness count in his favour when considering a partner for Campbell? Taylor is slow and unfit.

What?

can't see how. Are you mental?

Just read that this will most likely end Woodgate's Spurs career.

Upgrade on that overpriced halfwit Johnson.

Hope it's the last we see of him.

That would explain why he's still here. I hope that shut's Ronaldo up who always say he wasn't on anything near that That you know a bloke who knows a bloke who likes to make things up? Yeah, well impressed and completely surprised by this news.

Ethi's spent the last year denying the existence of his own father in order to give Hughton the 'credit.'

You credit Chris for Sol being good enough now?

Maybe even 25.

I think he'll score 20.

If the wages were going to deprive us of a new striker then I doubt we would even consider Sol tbh. Edit - For the record I think Campbell is also still a better CB than Taylor at this moment in time. Probably, but it's not saying much.

In the short term he's a better option than Williamson. So in light of Taylor's injury it's not a bad signing, providing the wages aren't going to deprive us of a new striker.

Lovenkrands is a good fella and deserves a lot of praise for his professionalism last season. But it's certainly clouding a few judgements. Next season we won't be playing the cavalier, attacking football that we employed in February - April. Which is really the only circumstance under which he can get goals. We'll also be up against much better defenders, and the need for that extra physicality and ability to drop deep will increase tenfold.

"No longer prepared to do that" I read somewhere, I think. I thought it was said in his September/October 2008 statement .

Fabricated nonsense, I never said that. Playing with Peter Lovenkrands regularly next season will see us relegated.

It was at St James'.

13 league goals in how many minutes upfront. I dont put much trust into your assessment of players ability, thats just normal 3 of those have nowt to do with his position on the pitch, given the fact that they were penalties. As for the other 10, 8 of them came at home when we were absolutely dominating teams with Routledge and Jonas taking the piss. Do you really think this sounds like a player who'll be successful in the Premier League? You have your head firmly in the sand. Of course, you were saying Lovenkrands was prem class back when Nile Ranger and Leon Best were getting a game ahead of him.

13 league goals makes him good enough for the prem? Wake the fuck up. Players like Peter Lovenkrands are the reason we'll struggle next season.

In fact, it's the only thing he's got going for him I'm assuming he means his attitude on the pitch. Ie half arsing his way around and grinning like a goon when we are losing. Yep.