Jump to content

LiquidAK

Member
  • Posts

    16,529
  • Joined

Everything posted by LiquidAK

  1. Would it get goals though? That's my concern. More so than a 4-4-2 with Loven and Carroll upfront I think, Lovenkrands doesn't really offer anything that Ben Arfa doesn't in terms of finishing or shooting, and the latter is more likely to create for others as well.
  2. Carroll Jonas - Ben Arfa - Wayne Would give us all the movement and pace we need imo, think Ben Arfa's a better option than Lovenkrands too who I have my doubts about.
  3. Good he can have him. Typical thoughtless response. What would you suggest we do without him? That's easy, put Raylor in his place & spend the £8M on a striker 1. You are probably just garth under a badly thought out alias. 2. £8 million?! :lol:
  4. Hugely disappointing 2nd half performance. We were really good in the first but got owned in the 2nd.
  5. Jonas has been quality so far. Should start Jonas on the left, and have Ben Arfa in the hole instead of Nolan for the next game.
  6. Was always gonna happen when we took Ben Arfa and Tiote off, and left Nolan on. He can't keep going for 90 minutes.
  7. Get in!! This'll force them to come out and we can go raping them.
  8. LiquidAK

    Hatem Ben Arfa

    David Ginola on Goals on Sunday was talking about wor Hatem. - In France they believe he's the most skillful player since Zidane - One of the best players of his generation - Needs to be more focused on his professional career and he will be fantastic. - We need to remember there's only one David Ginola though
  9. I love Tiote even more after this thread.
  10. Who's to say the current squad wouldn't be upset if he came back? It's not just us, its a squad who went down, slugged out in the Championship and come back as a written off team while he sits on his massive wages talking about the massive club he joined. If I were a player i'd be well fuked off to see the return of the judas prick. I agree, but that's not why most people don't want him back. They don't want him back because he's a 'judas prick', not because of the effect he might have on team moral. So you agree some players will feel the same, so they in theory they would have to also put their feelings aside to have him back for 'the good of the club' The good of the club for me is to blood our young keeper with currently a limitless potential, not go back to a keeper who's peaked and on the slide. I agree with you mate, there's no argument here. If you read the thread you'll see I said a very similar thing, I don't want him here because it'll stunt Krul further. My point was that there are those posting here that had a go at people for putting their feelings of respect for Given ahead of the club when they said they didn't hate him for leaving, when they're doing the exact same thing, only with feelings of anger rather than respect.
  11. its called principles. they are subjective and right at this minute we are not having to play him in the last game of the season to stop up, taking everything into consideration i'd rather not have him here. But to say you'd risk relegation because of it is madness. Another relegation could kill us, are our principles worth that much?
  12. Who's to say the current squad wouldn't be upset if he came back? It's not just us, its a squad who went down, slugged out in the Championship and come back as a written off team while he sits on his massive wages talking about the massive club he joined. If I were a player i'd be well fuked off to see the return of the judas prick. I agree, but that's not why most people don't want him back. They don't want him back because he's a 'judas prick', not because of the effect he might have on team moral.
×
×
  • Create New...