Jump to content

NG32

Member
  • Posts

    55,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NG32

  1. 2) where is he anyway, not seen or heard from this snake for months. we need a song for this snake.
  2. He was right in this court case. But how right was he to just give up on the team and cause so much damage over his sacred misplaced principles? Seemingly for some people it's more important that Keegan won his trial. Its the final nail in the coffin for these cunts that own and run our football club, pretty much what most people on here gathered anyway apart from the AKA crew who just hate KK full stop. Fucking plebs.
  3. How the f*** is he a 'thieving c***' for claiming any amount in a case which he went on to win? Stick to NFL, you plum. Agreed compensation of 2m, he got what he deserved, but he tried to get more. How does that make him a thief? Haha, okay, attempted thief. What was he trying to steal? Did he not give justification for his claim? Did he not then accept that this justification was flawed? I don't care what he has said after the decision had been made, it's completely irrelevant. When in court (or whatever it's called!) he tried to get £25m and he failed as it was completely unjustifiable. So, again, how does that make him a thief? Were the fans that attempted to sue the club over the seats affair 'thieving c***s'? Was Bobby Robson a 'thieving c***'? 1) already explained 2) have no clue about said cases Sending me PMs is pretty pathetic like. You haven't explained a thing. Avoiding questions is more so, I'd say. You're f***ing plastic, pal. He tried to get £25m and he failed as it was completely unjustifiable. Your random insults are pretty needless. Actually, this was more specifically meant for people such as yourself: No, 99% of the forum shouldn't blindly infer they know the technicalities revolving around legal disputes relating to termination of contracts that went on behind closed doors (EDIT: I'm not saying 99% of the forum are doing this by the way, just repeating the figure you used). Opinions are fine, but if they are coming from blind assumptions about something people don't understand they are rightly going to get shot down. I read law, i've got f*** all idea about what happened here but i'd hazard a guess Keegan handed the facts over to his legal team and went 'sort this out for me please' and they took it from there. Because Keegan isn't a solicitor, he's a pretty basic football man. Building a 25m straw man to beat down is pretty pointless when i'd happily bet a fair amount of money keegan had nothing to do with that figure. Do you think he went to his solicitors and went "right boys, i'd like one of those stigma pay offs for 8.6m, all my wages and anything else you reckon i can get"? Or do you think he went with what they told him because they are trained to deal with this and he wouldn't have a clue what to do in a court hearing? Hmmm... Neither of us know the ins and outs of why they really decided those figures, but Keegan was obviously aware of what they were asking for and could have told them not to go so far. But neither of us can really conclusively answer this can we? It's just a matter of opinion. I think he could've told them he didn't want to claim for so much, as he had some personal investiment in the club. He didn't do that. But there will be reasons for these figures, he'd have known he wouldn't get them, they would have been used for the purposes of the case. He couldn't go in and say he just wanted the 2m as they'd have settled straight away and Keegan wouldn't have been able to have the facts independently published as they have been. The ludicrous amount of 25m assured it went to tribunal, at which point it would appear from the quotes in the other thread keegan immediately accepted he wouldn't get the stigma damages as long as all findings were published, which is what he has said he wanted to happen, to clear his name. I think I trust Keegan enough to believe this rather than that he was trying to take the club to the cleaners. Well thats the crux of the matter really. I don't trust him enough to believe that. So you genuinely believe he wanted to take us for as much money as he could? Do you really think he then set out to f*** it over deliberately just to spite Mike Ashley? Keegan has a lot of flaws i'm happy to admit that, but to think he is a liar out to milk the club dry is just crazy. I don't think his reasoning was to kill the club (and don't think £25m would achieve that... at least I hope not!), I think he just wanted to get as much money as he could possibly manage, even if it greatly harmed NUFC. Rather than claiming for what he deserved. Worng, you really are a moron. Just admit that you were wrong.
  4. My qualm with Keegan is that he gave up on us (again) and dumped the club in the s*** from a sporting perspective and left us in the hands of people we thought were c***s (and apparently he knew were c***s). I have never defended Ashley, and was expecting this type of verdict. However how does this change what my problem with Keegan is? It doesn't. How the hell can you work with wankers like AShley and his crew, you cant, they are a bunch if clueless bellends. he didn't want to walk away but felt he had to.
  5. Ha ha ha what abunch of cunts ashley and his merry band of wankers are. COme on the Keegans haters lets have you out then, come on get on with it! Knackers.
  6. The ashley bummers cant see it tho. Slurping up ashleys love juice by the glass full.
  7. Why not 86 - 0? genuine question. Because that would be ridiculous That would mean BC would not touch the ball for 90 minutes + We aint that good.
  8. To be honest its a rare occurance to have a good atmosphere save for a one off game since the stadium went from 36k. Like you say in the past it was the norm whereas now we are scratching our heads to think of anything even close since that Barca game And yet, you have a chance to remedy this problem but choose not to. i was in l7 last night and sang plenty... incidently if anyone got stuck in queue, blame Gimps lass, she got her handbag stuck in the turnstile. if ever there was an example of women at football matches :-[
  9. Loads more to it, its like the TV show lost!
  10. I'd laugh my cock off is Ashley wins, then cry.
  11. Probably something to do with walking out on us for a second time and trying to bleed the club of 10 million, which given our current situation, is really s***. Just because he did great things for us in the past doesn't mean he's forever void of criticism and can do no wrong until the day he dies. -----go to square 1 Awesome game of Snakes n Keegan.......................Keegan being the ladders.
  12. Never had the fan base to support such reckless spending.
  13. We would storm this division with KK in charge, FACT.
  14. The lad needs a rest, lets burn out harewood while he is on loan. Harewood looks like he has something to prove at the minute so lets use that to our advantage. Remember Ranger is still only a young lad, lets not over use him early in his career.
  15. Thought we were caught out with how well QPR played, their midfield we're quick and they worked hard, I was impressed with them. We were sloppy at times last night but overall a 1-1 was a fair result. Some of the mistakes reminded me of last seasons relegation, but we can put this all behind us again with another home game on sat.
  16. eh? Sigh. I said, why don't one of these people complaining about the song suggest changing it to one of the thousands of people singing it. See how they get on, y'know? You had a gimp moment CP40...............wait a second thats me!!!!! Cunts!
  17. "you fat retail sports distributor, get out of our club!"
  18. Whilst its not exact, it lets fatman know he is not wanted, unless you can come up with a ditty of your own.
×
×
  • Create New...