-
Posts
12,178 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by brummie
-
Heard earlier that Chelsea sent a load of tickets back to Liverpool for this one. If that is true, then it really is what a much loved poster of these parts would term a DISGRACE.
-
Meanwhile, on every other club's board right now ... "That Barton's done it again, what a twat" "Yeah, but I'd have him" "Yeah so would I" etc etc
-
This is almost as amusing as the "Leeds 10m Maradona Swoop" ones that surfaced in about 1986.
-
Empty seats won't affect him, mainly because it won't happen, at least not to any notable extent.
-
I agree. Now which one do you fancy selling us? Ameobi! Ha ha, i like your style!
-
I agree. Now which one do you fancy selling us?
-
Dyer. Fucking hell.
-
What would piss me off, if I were one of you lot, is the total lack of animation on the part of Roeder. Sitting there practically asleep.
-
Anfield whispers to me, too, whenever i go there. Mainly it whispers reminders of all the fucking neanderthal fans I encountered there, chucking pool balls, bottles of piss and coins into the away end. and the annual struggle to get out of there in one piece every time we went there in the 80s.
-
Aye me too, horrible term. Me as well.
-
If a manager was making transfer decisions based on his own personal financial gain, rather than the good of his club, then the supporters of that club have every right to be very annoyed. It is widespread, but the allegations against him were pretty hefty. The fact he didn;t take any action is a bit worrying. But as you said, it doesn't really matter in the wider picture, if he keeps his club's fans happy.
-
Not to my knowledge, at least...curiouser and curiouser... nah, he didn't. just refused to give any interviews to the BBC. not a big loss..... That's not the point we're hinting at, though. BBC broadcasts program containing loads of allegations against Sam. Sam denies them angrily, says he's going to sue the BBC for this slander etc etc. Several months later, no hint of legal action. Hmmmm. Good manager, mind.
-
He never did sue the BBC, did he? Hmmm.
-
^^^ this kind of endearing fatalism is one reason why i have such a soft spot for Newcastle ^^^
-
This strikes me as somewhat daft. Why risk a crucially important player like him in a pointless game at the arse end of the season, rather than give him the entire summer and pre-season to prepare? And on the sods law side of things, you just know something bad is going to happen.
-
Fair point, but you could also look at it from the other side, and consider that Man United are within spitting distance of winning the league, and could very well be about to add the Champions League and the FA Cup to that. If i were a Man United fan, I wouldn't have wanted the takeover to be funded by debt, but if anything was able to make me forget about it, it would be that kind of treble.
-
To be honest, given that they're bright enough to have got themselves so incredibly rich in the first place (well, most of them), I'd imagine they're sharp enough to realise that as well.
-
Unfortunately, that happened years ago, at about the time clubs started referring to us as "customers" and not supporters, and at about the time that money took over as the only thing that mattered.
-
That may be the case, but I recall reading about Shepherd taking the piss out of your fans for the prices you paid for your replica shirts, calling women supporters dogs and calling your biggest hero in years "Mary Poppins". A lot of these suspicions about the new raft of owners might have some grounding in fact, but the traditional British owners have hardly been philanthropic types, have they?
-
Ridsdale isn't paying the price, apparently the Cardiff directors were quaffing champagne yesterday when they heard Leeds were down. The club (and more precisely, the supporters) are paying the price, as witnessed by their descent into the third division. True, but Ridsdale is a Leeds supporter mate, and had his opportunity, and made a mess of it. I read an interview somewhere with him recently, and he's a wiser man for the experience, but its too late for him and the other Leeds supporters. Personally, I smiled yesterday when I saw that result. Quite a lot in fact, as I don't like them very much, and I hate Ken Bates and Denis Wise. I don't like Leeds, and they have a vile element to their support (which, in fairness, all clubs have, only theirs is larger). I do feel sorry for individual Leeds fans, mind, it will be horrible for them. Still, you never know, other clubs have done great things within 10 years of coming out of that League .....
-
I've said this before, but I really mean it, our new American overlords have been absolutely incredible when it comes to understanding our identity and history, utterly faultless. In fact, they've exceeded our expectations. Whether Gillet and Hicks will do that with Liverpool, I don't know, but I can't knock Lerner thus far. More understanding of what the club means in the 8 months they've been there than we got in 30 years on and off with Ellis' very English ownership.
-
As I mentioned earlier, this wouldn't surprise me, it is exactly what happened with our takeover and the MON appointment. :-) (sorry).
-
Ridsdale hasn't paid, and isn't paying the price, apparently the Cardiff directors were quaffing champagne yesterday when they heard Leeds were down. The club (and more precisely, the supporters) are paying the price, as witnessed by their descent into the third division.
-
TBH. Maybe Fulham? What's the "surely he's off to Citeh" comments based on? And aye, i'd bet a decent amount Gary Speed got offered it. Surely Pearce is a dead man walking - their fans have had enough, he's clearly not got a clue what is going on. He's probably jacked it in now, knowing that the comments about leaving at the end of the season have made it impossible for him to carry on. It may also be an attempt to avoid situations where he's going to be asked about Pearce's job whilst Pearce is still there. The only confusing thing is the state of the Citeh takeover, whcih is obviously still in very early days. If he's staked it all on Ranson winning, then he's in a tricky situation. Although it could be like our takeover when all interested parties agreed they wanted the same man for the job, maybe. I dunno, at least it makes the end of season more interesting.