He was better than his predecessor, that's about it.
Looking at stats alone, Capello's squads won or drew in 86% of their matches. Granted that includes meaningless friendlies and what not and I understand the sour taste left after the WC. But still, that's the best non-loss percentage since Venables. Winning percentage at 66% was best in the last 60 years.
The problem isn't necessarily that Capello was let go, but that Capello left such a bad taste with the English that they decided to ignore everyone who wasn't English. As if all foreign managers are like Capello.
That's all well and good but tournament performance is really all that matters at international level for a country like England.
And I don't think there's anything wrong with that, wanting an English manager to do the job. People seem to have this bee in their bonnet about "bloody little Englanders demanding an Englishman, how small minded" - correct me if I'm wrong but isn't two foreign managers two more than Germany/France/Spain/Brazil/Argentina/Italy/Holland have ever had?
Personally I don't really see why the rules about international management are any different to the rules about international players and imo they should be from that particular country just the same.
Holland have had 12 English managers, 14 Dutch, 4 Austrian, 2 Scottish, a German, a Romanian and a Czech.
France were managed by Romanian Stefan Kovacs in the 70s.
You're right about the rest though