Dr.Spaceman

9 minutes ago, LFEE said:

If we sold for argument sake Wilson & Almiron for a total of approximately £30m. What does that then allow us to spend this coming season?

Isn't it like 100 million or something?

Can't even wear mine in the house without feeling like a massive charver 

He would have also been really useful (had he stayed fit) through large parts of the season.

Palmer again.

Heed 2-0

I always say 2-0 in the voice of that mental commentator they've got.

3 minutes ago, Checko said:

BTW, did anyone else know Everton have comfortably the fourth best defensive record in the league at the moment? Conceded 7 fewer than Spurs and Villa and 6 fewer than Man U.

 

They can't score, but still impressive.

Sean Dyche innit. Looks good in isolation but when you consider they've got about 45% of the goals we've got...

That was lush from Palmer

Jesus

Nicholas Jackson is like Amazon Basics Isak

Beto should have had that in the net

3 minutes ago, Disco said:

Heed 1-0 Chesterfield 

The game I wanted to watch tonight but my service isn't playing ball

1 hour ago, 54 said:

I hate Everton as much as the next guy, but a founding member of the EFL, and one of the oldest clubs in the UK going into administration, and potentially going out of business isn't a something to be happy or excited about. It is a damning indictment of everything that is wrong with football and the way it is currently set up.

But Froggy told us that the rules are good 

3 minutes ago, toon25 said:

He's definitely not made for punditry that's for sure

I am surprised at this.

We're not a charity with a moral obligation to look at players who have fallen from grace who were once considered a great prospect. He's had a canny season for Luton, that's his level.

Nah, the error to release a design clearly showing a number 4 on every shirt was horrendous.

On 14/04/2024 at 15:41, SUPERTOON said:

 

3 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

I see what you're saying, but I don't think Isak is the type of striker to push that hard, as I could see him start breaking down if so.

 

When we've had both Isak and Wilson available, they were both being rotated quite consistently and both were firing on all cylinders. Could see a similar approach going forward if we had the right kind of options at striker.

I don't see any other option tbh. Nobody good enough is coming to be backup (even to someone as good as Isak) for anything other than half a season, a year maybe if they're young. This is why it's imperative that we're in Europe every year from here imo.

4 minutes ago, TRC said:

That fucker scored a hattrick against us and hasn't been seen since.

He looked absolutely class that day, thought he was on for a proper Harry Kane style breakthrough season.

God forbid we'd try something different.

I guess it just counts as expenditure in the same way weekly wages and flat transfer fees do.

51 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

This works great in FM.

 

In reality they eat a big signing on fee and their wages prove prohibitively high unless it's a youngster signed on the cheap.

Aye, I was suggesting it a little tongue in cheek. I seem to remember Tielemans wanting 10 mil to sign for Villa 

We should just sign every semi-decent or better free transfer available to us and flip them a year later if they're no good for a few million.

3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

He would be a brilliant signing.

Dunno like, my Man City supporting mate reckons he's been one of their worst ever signings.

Seen him a few times and he does look poor in that side, giving the ball away often.

An elite right sided forward.

No game for us on the weekend really helps here. Think we hammer them.