Ba offers more than Bent outside of scoring though, he seems to me like a complete forward, big, strong, fast and skillful rather than just a goal poacher like Bent.
Nobody else found this interesting?
Even if we get lots of shots away, all it means is that we'll probably have a consolation Cabaye screamer after they fucking tank us.
One West Ham fan I've heard talking about it seemed to think that if they got it they would quickly rise to the top and challenge the best because of how huge they would suddenly become. The same bloke was also saying that most of the other clubs in England request not to play on the same day as West Ham because they're so huge already mind so I think we can move that to one side.
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=281935.0
Anyone able to make sense of this? Do you think we have the essence of the foot? The mackems have the essence of the bum.
If anything that should be better for Ben Arfa as he was fresh playing against tired players, yet...
he wont be fresh til he's match fit and you know that as well as i do
So why was he so much better when he came on against Blackburn then?
I would suggest this is because Blackburn were an utter disaster, he won't have had a particularly hard time doing what he liked compared to against a side like Spurs.
Not going to let myself get complacent like, yes we are a better side and we absolutely expect to win this but they've thrown us banana skins before, there's always the possibility of a slip up, especially with us.
That kind of attitude pisses me off more than just saying they're shit tbh, I hate the way that mentality is seemingly ingrained into English football.
There's too much pressure on Sessegnon to perform in that side. He's just about their only creative outlet, if he doesn't do well in every game they've basically got nothing.