But but but, they're Bruce's buys?
Caulkin has as much a clue as Edwards. He built a reputation on being significantly more articulate that the typical local journalist and having a tenuous friendship with Staveley which has been shown up to be worth less than a slice of dung smeared toast.
I'd be happy to state that people on this forum know as much about what has gone on as Caulkin does after the last few months.
Completely untrue.
How so? People on here only know what Caulkin and the press tell them barring a few that claim to be ITK. So i Don't think it's unreasonable to claim that people on here know as much as he does (or publishes at least).
There's enough members watching many many sources and reports, so anything that comes out tends to end up here one way or another.
So your argument is that we know as much as Caulkin does after he tells us, which means he knows nowt? That would only be true if he never received new info.
Also the reasoning that all his info from Staveley is worthless because what she's told him hasn't always come to pass is faulty. For instance she might be assured the takeover is being allowed soon. She tells Caulkin who passes, something changes and it doesn't happen That's a case of changing circumstances rather than inaccurate info. So it's no reason the think all other info is worthless.
I tried this approach a while back, with Sean if I remember correctly(maybe Godzilla). What a fun time that was.