Wilson

Shearer almost criticising Bruce there. Canny.

Longstaff getting a minute under his belt.

Someone give the fucker a jab Get in

nightmare.

Bruce coming into his own again...let him carry on...run it off lad!

I do enjoy a good Leeds love in.

I hear you but the difference now is a third party monitoring results. An earlier than usual panic and manager replacement is more possible than in previous years What third party? Are we still pretending that Staveley is going to buy the club? Wake up. Why not? Do you know something that we don't? By we I mean the rest of the world. Well the rest of the world knows that they have walked away. Unless you know better? Have they? Smart arse! She was never interested anyway. Tyre kicker so I've heard.

Baaahahahaha

Nice

Blokes and absolute cunt.

Well this is bollocks

Pleased it wasn't all silent tbh, quite enjoyed reading all the speculation about it throughout lockdown. Not like it had any impact on the outcome either.

We get it. He's defo not, he runs with his head down far too much, and I like him I meant DE's stance on ASM.

We get it.

Shocking from Almiron. Shocking from Wilson.

Just remembered about this.

As valid an opinion as anyone's I suppose, but sounds pretty plausible tbf.

Did anyone (of any significance) ever comment on the article being removed from the lawyers site?

'Fuck nas your onna'

I've got no idea what's going on but I just can't see that them removing it from their site is a good thing.

Just add it to the list of things that fade into nothing and we never hear of again.

Well that can't be good Edit: The thing about the lawyers, that is.

But but but, they're Bruce's buys? Caulkin has as much a clue as Edwards. He built a reputation on being significantly more articulate that the typical local journalist and having a tenuous friendship with Staveley which has been shown up to be worth less than a slice of dung smeared toast. I'd be happy to state that people on this forum know as much about what has gone on as Caulkin does after the last few months. Completely untrue. How so? People on here only know what Caulkin and the press tell them barring a few that claim to be ITK. So i Don't think it's unreasonable to claim that people on here know as much as he does (or publishes at least). There's enough members watching many many sources and reports, so anything that comes out tends to end up here one way or another. So your argument is that we know as much as Caulkin does after he tells us, which means he knows nowt? That would only be true if he never received new info. Also the reasoning that all his info from Staveley is worthless because what she's told him hasn't always come to pass is faulty. For instance she might be assured the takeover is being allowed soon. She tells Caulkin who passes, something changes and it doesn't happen That's a case of changing circumstances rather than inaccurate info. So it's no reason the think all other info is worthless. I tried this approach a while back, with Sean if I remember correctly(maybe Godzilla). What a fun time that was.