1964

This is the bit that gets me Adam Johnson got found Not guilty of one charge of sexual activity this proves that this so called innocent victim who persuade and wanted it is a LIAR! Barring the illiteracy and the flaw in the logic that innsuffcient evidence can mean a not guilty verdict does it not strike them as telling that the same jury found him guilty of a serious sexual crime with a child? To accept the jury's decision on one count, claim innocence and then use that to conclude that the same jury are guilty of a miscarriage of justice on a further count is mackem logic at it's finest.

As suspected she has been hung out to dry. I doubt the full truth will ever come out but the statement stinks. She is a qualified criminal lawyer given incriminating documentation regarding a high profile employee and didn't read them? as a qualified criminal lawyer she didn't share any of the incriminating evidence with anyone at the club :lol: If anyone really buys that they are f***ing thick.

Maybe they are so incompetent they've only sacked his car.

You'd think this lot would have some humility after years and years of utter failure to meet even their own modest targets, but alas. If ever a club hierarchy deserved to go down for mismanagement and utter arrogance this is it. Oddly enough I have never wanted us to lose even in the darkest times but I really hope Leicester royally hump us. A seemingly well run club with someone who knows what they're doing, a smattering of good players, a couple of great players who are all well coached and trained to do their job and want to play for the team. It would be great to see them win it, they deserve what they get and so do we.

Shelvey or Collocini? Or both

Seems dead Jong

I don't think he will be sacked but only because they won't find anyone else stupid enough to take it

The strap line is enough for me 'Adam Johnson got found not guilty of one charge of sexual activity this proves that this so called innocent victim who persuade and wanted it is a LIAR!' I can only assume 'persuade' is supposed to be pursued and even ignoring 'got found not guilty', the chasm in the logic is staggering. If this clown is over 10 then it is a sad indictment of the education system

Dave was injured in the warmup. :lol: let's hope it's just cramp and he's back for the mackems

Are any of us playing? Seems as though it's pretty random so I was just wondering if we'd had a call up

Get on this one from RTG following a story in the Sunderland Echo about an annoyed parent. 'Hope this isn't too controversial but why is the son forced to remove a photo with him and Johnson, Johnson is a complete idiot but I don't see why the son should get rid of a happy memory. Hope this doesn't sound stupid like'

Outstanding work :lol: Chemical Margi

The dust has now settled on Raring to Groom and they have collectively decided that: Johnson is the only one carrying any blame The club were only told he gave the girl a kiss but as far as the club were concerned it was probably a peck as he has just given her a shirt Once in possession of the what's app messages the club didn't look at them and passed them to the QC unread It would have been illegal to suspend him as he would have lost earnings from goal and appearance bonuses and the PFA have a lot to answer for as they insisted he was reinstated Margaret Byrne is/isn't a qualified criminal lawyer and needs to go as despite the fact that she is/isn't a qualified criminal lawyer she didn't read the whatsapp messages The magedia have got it in for Sunderland and everyone else in the world who thinks that Sunderland have a lot to answer for have an agenda The club are entirely blameless in this The girl was asking for it and is now only after money Anyone see links with Chemical Ali? 'There are no American tanks in Iraq', at the same time a fucking massive one was visible over his shoulder.

Dropped at the weekend then

Hilarious if he could be found guilty on both counts on appeal

Inevitable

They aren't pleading ignorance only that they did not know he was pleading guilty. They saw the condemning evidence last year and did nothing. They are a disgrace

I note it doesn't ssy that they knew nothing and had not seen evidence such as whatsapp messages which basically proved his guilt from the start

Returning to Gaol have already deleted one thread

But it can't be that clear cut or they would have a verdict now

The longer this drags the more likely to be not guilty i reckon

They have asked for the positioning of his car??? Its not where his car was ladies and gents!!!

Does this mean they've reached a verdict? If so he is knackered I reckon