1964

The Watford owners are notoriously dodgy, I know a football agent who was told that following the sale of his player they weren't going to pay him. As he wasn't a big agent they basically made him go through the courts, which he did and won His risk was losing everything in legal costs and they thought he wouldn't see it through. Absolute cowboys

Will the PL be shitting themselves if the CAT case gets the go-ahead and we are looking certs for relegation? I imagine if Ashley wins, the damages claim would be huge

Osama Burns Laden throwing the fatwa's around now?

I'll be happy to never read another ludicrously contrived Interpretation of a Nick de Marco tweet

Been referred to VAR, decision expected before December

Everton fans do not rate Davies, too slow and too shit

So the CAT case will fail in your opinion?

If the Saudis do walk away and the CAT case runs, would this not form part of the case against the PL, i.e. they have literally been the causation of a failed 300m deal. Would the sanction not be commensurate? Or am I talking bollocks?

Black Knight syndrome

But not her husband???

Staveley's limbless torso outside the gallowgate, holding a sharwarma wrap in her gob and threatening passers by

The Black Knight from monty python looms large in here, no matter how many fatal blows he takes, there is still a belief he will win

Jordan is clearly not as clever as he thinks he is. The PL could never unequivocally prove that SA government is not involved in piracy because its impossible to prove a negative. The burden of proof would be on the PL to prove it is. The fucking moron!

Last Friday in August at 3.00pm?

Aye, fair point, let's hope so

Is the Newcastle saga likely to impact that really tho? Genuine question btw, I know the Arab nation hold a great deal of weight to honour and may see this as a sleight but similarly they need to invest in the west as much as we need investment, so they could well just move on quickly. I know they've stuck it out thus far but would losing it mean a great deal to their overall investment portfolio or their reputation, it's hardly front page news?

I'm not even sure if this is meant to be ironic anymore

It's also my birthday, so get this done

The difference is though they are neither side of the contract, I think its reasonable to ask for transparency in a process whereby they are the governance and set the rules

Yeah it's seems incredible that in even now in 1974 you can get it so wrong

what's the worst case scenario

There's no fucking about in the euros, does it look onside, yes give it, no dont. No endless forensic study of armpit hair, other than 2 shit penalties not overturned its been good

Can you use an out of court settlement offer as evidence? I doubt it aren't they usually prefaced with a phrase like 'without prejudice' to stop that? Could be talking out of my hoop however

Charles Munson

I would pay money to see Masters sired in public