The thing of it to me is regardless of all the other ethical issues, it is fundamentally wrong for premier league clubs to be owned by state level actors, let alone billionaire businessmen of dubious repute. It leaves clubs, which are important community 'assets' with historic and cultural value to fans subject to the whims of things way beyond merely the world of football. Clubs should be fan owned so safeguard their wellbeing and to make sure they are run better. Unfortunately it is probably impossible to force the clubs to sell even small proportions of the clubs.
If the league does not bring in fan ownership it should at least but stringent rules in place about how businessmen operate clubs in the league. The league can and should say you are not welcome in the league unless you meet these standards to prevent owners like Ashley happening.
Unfortunately the set up is no accident, it is set up to bring in maximum investment so a few clubs have all the money. This system is designed to get investment like Saudi money in. I will not refuse myself the joy of ambition and investment in the club, I will not resent any excitement among fans. I also know in my ideal running of the league that would, without all other leagues instituting the same rules, lead to all the top talent deserting the league for pay elsewhere. It is not illogical to have it how they do, it brings the big players, it brings the product in the league that generates the investment. It just rips the soul out of the whole thing and endangers the wellbeing of clubs long term (look at the amount of debt Man United are in). That is the tradeoff. All my anger is at the whole running of football. I am not interested in this competition some have going on of 'oh but Qatar are also evil'. Yes they are all cunts. Yes there are people acting unscripulously who are pretending to be moral crusaders and maybe people getting political points out of the Khasoggi thing it's all just a swamp from which noone comes out looking great. I just don't think all this stuff is, for me with the qualms over it just an appendum. Football clubs should never have been allowed to be political pawns of whole states, even if it wasn't Saudi Arabia, even if it was some nice state noone hates like fucking New Zealand who bought us to boost tourism (not sure budget would be that great) it is still utterly wrong, albeit not much more than being 100% owned by random billionaires. The league should take some action to safeguard the clubs for the fans in the long term and normally will not do so in order to make a quick buck.
If the league rejects the ownership it will not be over 'moral' grounds, contrary to some it is not a test of the morals of Saudi Arabia. If it does it will be over Saudi Arabia piracy issue and I guess (and yes a lot of people are on long chains of logic of what is going on here) and of course a league can't completely ignore concerns of broadcast partners. Neither can it renegotiate the deal with Saudi Arabia mid takeover as that would be clear bribery. Even if they pretend it is some kind of moral stand against a state like Saudi Arabia owning the club that is like drawing a line in the sand so far out to sea you are already drowning. I do slightly fear this, that it will be thrown out so the league can pretend to look principled regardless of the legal reasoning. I dread a long drawn out legal battle as if the takeover hasn't taken long enough as is.
I appreciate the 'don't care just want it done view' completely, I am mostly with you. I just think it's possible to feel a little sad at how football has got to this point, but also joyous that Ashley is gone and some money is coming to the club and the area. I will not resent that, and I hope, as much as I think it's wooly nonsense, that Saudi Arabian engagement in the world will improve things (although that reminds me of when Brendan Rogers after losing to sunderland with liverpool said he was proud to show the poor people of the north east his brand of football a bit, we are not some shining beacon of righteousness, it is again, an issue that sports clubs should not be mere playthings of teh super rich and of nation states). I think it's miserable how much shit seems to have come out of it, now maybe that's on me for dissenting a little from the isn't it all so completely wonderful line, but all teh attacks on everyone in the media etc feels slightly uneeded. There are some dishonest folk around, there is also a completely broken model of funding sports journalism which means even the good journos are reliant on clickbait a bit. It would be better if there was a quality filter but I do also think it is a respectable opinion to say that the takeover should be blocked, even if I disagree as it's a systemic issue not with this takeover by itself.
I am really looking forward to ambition and to enjoying the football again. I hope we get there, I really do. But again I won;t be cheerleading our owners, more cordially hoping it is positive in the end and hoping some reform comes for how clubs are run one day. I also do slightly fear now if it will happen, it is ridiculous how long it is taking, almost like they want SA to withdraw interest so they are freed of making a lose-lose decision from their PR point of view.