Jump to content

Sean

Member
  • Posts

    5,891
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sean

  1. They always have been, in fact them making any sound at all is an improvement. If it wasn’t for Wenger they would be a forgotten club, doubt they would even be in the Premier League. Are you talking about the same Arsenal that has never been relegated in 100 years? I swear some people just make things up as they type.
  2. We do have infinite amounts of luck though.
  3. Why would the club give them new contracts if there was a takeover? Answer, it wouldn't.
  4. It really doesn't matter how many "people" are interested in buying us, as long as Mike Ashley is involved in negotiations, it's always going to end in disappointment. I have no doubts about the interest/bids for the club in the past. I think they've all been genuine but the 1 and only twat blocking any potential sale has been Mike Ashley all along. You really still believe that BZG, Kenyon, Barry Moat, GACP sports (I've probably missed a few more obvious ones) are all genuine?
  5. Shout at Mike after Keegan left I believe. He's held a grudge ever since, with no sign of mellowing before death.
  6. Only just noticed this. The lack of defending in midfield is pretty unique across the league, and no doubt Europe.
  7. But yet theres a never ending queue of billionaires who are too stupid to realise that the same thing keeps happening to anyone attempting to buy the club? And they've never called him out on it? Fuck, a few of them have written statements saying how lovely he is to deal with. I just don't buy it. Also, Caulkin has said the BZG thing was bollocks from the start, so he didn't move the goalposts there as there were none to move in the first place. Just a load of shite printed in the press and believed by many. A simple statement from the Saudi’s and the Reuben’s quashing all the rumours and speculation is all that it would take, yet silence from both parties. Yep, just like Sheik Khaled could have quashed the rumours the last time. And Kenyon also could have (surely nobody believes that was real either). IF it's bollocks like BZG was, then Ashley will use friends and/or aquantainces so they don't quash the rumours. Theres no proof either way, but Ashley has history of using names and the press to fool our fans. Why anyone would want to dismiss the possibility that he's doing it again is beyond me. And that's all I'm really saying, it's a possibility.
  8. But yet theres a never ending queue of billionaires who are too stupid to realise that the same thing keeps happening to anyone attempting to buy the club? And they've never called him out on it? Fuck, a few of them have written statements saying how lovely he is to deal with. I just don't buy it. Also, Caulkin has said the BZG thing was bollocks from the start, so he didn't move the goalposts there as there were none to move in the first place. Just a load of shite printed in the press and believed by many.
  9. The more I think about it, the more certain I am that Staveley isn't what she seems. It's the only thing that makes any sense really. I think scepticism is healthy where this club and takeover rumours are concerned, and I also think where she is concerned. Why wouldnt have the saudis, the reubens or MA himself have outed her if it was bollocks? To me, it seems that she understands the potential to have a stake in the club and raise its value. She would make a mint, if done correctly. Well her and Ashley met for a curry through a mutual friend, Richard Desmond, who also owns or runs a newspaper. Who's to say she isn't acquaintances with the Ruebens or the Saudis? I mean, she was initially billed as knowing everyone in the Middle East. And why would Ashley say anything? He's the one who wants this shit going on. It is a possibility that it's the same as the BZG bollocks, whether we want to admit it or not.
  10. The more I think about it, the more certain I am that Staveley isn't what she seems. It's the only thing that makes any sense really. I think scepticism is healthy where this club and takeover rumours are concerned, and I also think where she is concerned.
  11. Exactly. And why the hell would anyone be confident after the way the last attempt went? It just doesn't make sense. Unless it's a fakeover, then it all falls into piece.
  12. Who really gives a fuck about that? I mean, it would be nice but let's just concern ourselves with getting rid of Ashley first eh.
  13. Yes and people are still buying it. :lol: Just curious.... What exactly do you think these people are buying when you laugh at them? Is it that they believe there's a takeover attempt? (this is where I'm at but don't for one second believe it'll happen) Is it that they believe it'll actually be sold? (fair enough if so) Is it that they believe the absolute bull shit spouted in the rags and twitter? (again fair enough if so) Is it that you believe it's all an Ashley plan, there's no one interested and if people believe otherwise it's laughable? Genuine question by the way because I see a lot of these type of comments and assume it's because the poster thinks it's a 'fakeover' which (to me) means it's an ashley ploy. Which (again to me) is laughable. Did you believe BZG were involved in a takeover attempt, yes? Well, they weren't. What makes you so sure this time is different? Still puzzles me that if there’s nowt in it why don’t the Saudis and the Reuben brothers don’t come out and say so, they’ve got nowt to lose. I don't know either. I believed Staveley was genuine for a long time, but I'm beginning to doubt that now. We were played with the BZG rumours going on for months that were fake. And that's not the only time either. I honestly think Staveley must be the stupidest person on the planet to go back for round 2 of the failed circus that was her first attempt. I don't think she is that stupid, so there may well be another explanation. She has mutual friends with Mike after all.
  14. I'd be happy for us to be relegated, and as that is the case I support the opposition in individual games. I just don't see anything worthy of our support.
  15. Yes and people are still buying it. :lol: Just curious.... What exactly do you think these people are buying when you laugh at them? Is it that they believe there's a takeover attempt? (this is where I'm at but don't for one second believe it'll happen) Is it that they believe it'll actually be sold? (fair enough if so) Is it that they believe the absolute bull shit spouted in the rags and twitter? (again fair enough if so) Is it that you believe it's all an Ashley plan, there's no one interested and if people believe otherwise it's laughable? Genuine question by the way because I see a lot of these type of comments and assume it's because the poster thinks it's a 'fakeover' which (to me) means it's an ashley ploy. Which (again to me) is laughable. Did you believe BZG were involved in a takeover attempt, yes? Well, they weren't. What makes you so sure this time is different?
  16. 100% agreed. I also asked someone who knows the Reubens personally and received the same confirmation that they were involved in the bid. The issue is Mike[/member] Ashley You'd like to think Staveley isn't so fucking thick that she hasn't learned from the last time that Ashley isn't interested in selling wouldn't you? I mean, she made him 3 serious offers that he indicated he'd accept, then he had a curry with her, went on holiday for a few weeks then called her a time waster. Now, she's supposedly got some of the richest people on Earth wanting to buy. And yet...they haven't bought us. So I am questioning her motives at this point. Let's remember BZG was bollocks from the start (although plenty were absolutely adamant that was real of course), so it's not as if our fanbase hasn't been fooled before by a fakeover. And Paully, a journalist is only as good as their sources. And when it comes to this club and takeovers, there's never any shortage of sources passing pure shite to journalists.
  17. Trying to convince the helicopter anoraks that water is wet is a lesson in futility. I don’t mind taking a bit of stick but when 95% of the people who post on this thread literally contribute nothing other than reposting bullshit from Reddit or Twitter it gets a bit tedious. Instead or whatsapp? You’ve got some fucking nerve
  18. And? He’s hardly going to tell everyone to go home until their is an outcome is he? And? He's hardly likely to sell is he?
  19. At least he's making his posts entertaining this time.
  20. Whether he's a Pulitzer prize finalist or a Loeb winner, he is only as good as his sources. Would anyone be certain those 'sources' aren't full of shit though? Because it has to be a distinct possibility when it comes to this club and takeovers.
  21. The fuck are you talking about? When you see who posted it it starts to make a bit of sense. Fucking hell man.
  22. I'm left wondering why Staveley feels Ashley is likely to sell to her after the way the last attempt ended. I can see it ending the same way this time too. At this point I honestly don't know what to think of Staveley. She's the only party that has seemed credible in their attempts (BZG was bollocks from the start, although nobody would have that at the time of course). There has to be a slight possibility she's having us on and anyone who discounts that absolutely would be slightly foolish given the history here.
×
×
  • Create New...