-
Posts
5,655 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Sean
-
Yeah, the only blueprint the club will be following is Ashley's blueprint. The sooner those still giving him money walk away the better.
-
This is exactly how I feel also, just put better than I could manage.
-
The only depressing thing for me about yesterday is the fact that Ashley still owned the club. In those circumstances the afternoon couldn't have gone better.
-
It's disgraceful in the current circumstances. I don't remember them going on like this when we got hammered in better times past, so why now that the club is dying on it's knees, enabled by many of those people. I wish Netflix were doing a documentary on us this season, it'd be a must watch. Our fans would probably rival Sunderland's for stupidity, though sadly not for anger.
-
Ashley, selling club, PR stunt, diversionary tactic. As has always been the case.
-
Tactics are nonsense now according to Steve, this is comedy gold.
-
And all because the previous guy had the nerve to keep asking for a better gym and a swimming pool I still can't get over how beautiful Charnley's quote about "of course we'd like to have a swimming pool" was. Just can't quite afford one I assume
-
Lascelles' interview man, what a fucking mug.
-
I'm just finding it all hilarious tbh. It's karma and it's nothing less than Ashley's club deserves. Life's too short to be angry, and trying to support Ashley's club just induces anger in me, so now I just enjoy watching the slow motion car crash that was always going to unfold the moment Rafa left.
-
Yep, giving me a fucking headache. This is not worthy of support for fuck sake.
-
Just needs a Perez goal to top it all off.
-
Club is getting exactly what it deserves today. It's great to see too.
-
Really good goal.
-
I particularly like this quote from him: “I agree with the policy. I agree with it because it’s everybody’s policy. There’s not many that want to spend big, big money on a 29-year-old,” So £16 million is big, big money now is it?
-
I would too if I was a member!
-
That’s it for me. While putting the membership down to £1 and never once promoting ourselves as a protest group. As an organisation we will do more and achieve more with a bigger member base. What we're working on in the background is really exciting and is why we made a big drive for members (event at a quid). We've done a hell of a lot since the summer, but you won't see most of it yet. In most of what we do we can't do it with a running commentary in the public eye or else things will fail - this is how the world works - half baked ideas, plans, programmes - they fail. I can agree with this, as I remember asking a few questions in the summer which you took the time to answer really thoroughly. I was concerned the group wouldn't be 'militant' enough for my liking (for want of a better word). I didn't join at that point, instead I've waited to see what develops and if it's something I feel I can get behind. Currently I'm still at the waiting and watching stage, but it's hard to watch and see what develops if it's all behind closed doors. But again, I've learnt from yourself now that things are going on behind the scenes. This all makes sense. Almost all of what I've talked about us doing really is the bread and butter of any trust but there's some exciting things we're working on as well but need a bit more time. NUST isn't perfect - a lot of things need to improve and reducing the board down to 7 through these elections is just the start of that process. Your position makes perfect sense, if people were expecting instant change from giving an organisation £1 I am not sure what planet they are living. Some of the falsehoods and rhetoric we have to get around just to have a meaningful debate becomes tiresome, we're a group of people giving up a hell of a lot of spare time (and it's not just the board we have volunteers that have got in touch working on various things as well) and more often than not are met with unfounded nonsense. Like the lies that we all get free tickets and hospitality from the club - did you know all members of the so called NUFC fans forum get this mind? Free corporate hospitality - NUST representation on fans forum was one of only a few on it who turned this down. No wonder some of the fans forum are very cozy and don't ask any questions - we've been pushing for significant reform of the fans forum. Good post. Yeah I have heard that about the fans forum, I also believe (could be mistaken) it was the fans forum who were calling for no criticism of the clubs communication over the summer during the fakeover (having been asked by the club to do this). Things like this happening in the past within certain groups can make it easy to assume the same is happening elsewhere tbh.
-
1) 100 percent false. Complete lies if you have been told this. 2) It's got nothing to do with the board and this is very normal in any similar organisation - you need to be nominaed by two members - there's nearly 10,000 out there - not by members of the board. Considering we are reducing the board down from 12 to 7 (for good reason) no it's not a sneaky way of keeping people in the board, there's no need for us to even have this many of the board up for re-election but given where we are we felt it was right that the majority of the board were up for election. Have you read the Election Policy? https://nufctrust.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NUST-Election-Policy.pdf Greg can I ask you, without any malice, how many board members, like yourself, don't attend matches currently? 50% of the board don't attend anymore. Thanks. What would happen if that crept up to, say, 100% though? It would be a strange situation to say the least (even only 50% attending is strange really).
-
That’s it for me. While putting the membership down to £1 and never once promoting ourselves as a protest group. As an organisation we will do more and achieve more with a bigger member base. What we're working on in the background is really exciting and is why we made a big drive for members (event at a quid). We've done a hell of a lot since the summer, but you won't see most of it yet. In most of what we do we can't do it with a running commentary in the public eye or else things will fail - this is how the world works - half baked ideas, plans, programmes - they fail. I can agree with this, as I remember asking a few questions in the summer which you took the time to answer really thoroughly. I was concerned the group wouldn't be 'militant' enough for my liking (for want of a better word). I didn't join at that point, instead I've waited to see what develops and if it's something I feel I can get behind. Currently I'm still at the waiting and watching stage, but it's hard to watch and see what develops if it's all behind closed doors. But again, I've learnt from yourself now that things are going on behind the scenes.
-
1) 100 percent false. Complete lies if you have been told this. 2) It's got nothing to do with the board and this is very normal in any similar organisation - you need to be nominaed by two members - there's nearly 10,000 out there - not by members of the board. Considering we are reducing the board down from 12 to 7 (for good reason) no it's not a sneaky way of keeping people in the board, there's no need for us to even have this many of the board up for re-election but given where we are we felt it was right that the majority of the board were up for election. Have you read the Election Policy? https://nufctrust.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/NUST-Election-Policy.pdf Greg can I ask you, without any malice, how many board members, like yourself, don't attend matches currently?
-
This is true. They used the rightful anger of fans in the summer to get money from nearly everyone. There is a case for putting all these great initiatives on hold and not communicating with the club at all, so as not to be seen to be giving the club legitimacy in the eyes of their members. We are not in normal times with a normal club. Taking control of the club isn't even a pipe dream, it's not happening full stop. Even if we had all the money needed, as if Ashley would ever agree to sell to the fans.
-
What is this? Any reference that isn't riddled with ads and scripts that doesn't break your pc? Couldn't care less about this fakeover v.6.0. Anyone care to shed some light on the "now that we have proof from BZG that he moved the goalposts after a deal was agreed"? I haven't seen this before. That's because he's making it up. BZG were in on the joke.
-
Or not to criticise the clubs communication with fans. Sorry but it's fucking scandalous that supposed fans groups have been in on this shit previously.
-
I got a message at quarter past 9 saying that there would be breaking news tonight at 10:30. The news came from someone who got it off someone at NUST. NUST and NUFC have already agreed to release their statements and both knew about this news breaking before it did and when it would break. There is no way the club would know that the news would break if they weren’t in on it. What the fucking NUST are doing though is anyone’s guess. Apparently recently NUST has had face to face meetings with NUFC. Just what the fuck they are doing is probably the biggest question here. Looking increasingly more likely that they are far too pally with NUFC then they should be. This point is apt. I've been saying for ages now that fans groups etc need to take the lead on principle, do what's right and stop helping to give legitimacy to Ashley's running of the club. Who cares if not every fan will follow? It's the right, and probably only, course of action to take.