r0cafella

Aye, giving Manchester another tax payer funded stadium has to be an absolute no go in the eyes of any government. It makes literally no sense and provides tax payers with zero value.

Aye, can play the last 20 minutes when Isak is tired.

All of which we will get the most from a related party deal. We simply don’t have the same pull as the big 6. When the premier league was booming we were relevant for one season. The rest we were scratching around almost getting relegated.

Which other avenues? You think anyone was offering more than say Sela or Noon?

Your missing the point, we could have though, the point tcd is making is inflated sponsors would occur via linked parties, nobody in the right mind would give us such valuations. If anything our owners have shown they are extremely happy to play ball, to me it appears we are a legit investment for them and not a PSG or a city.

Because they’ve doubled dipped, they’ve sold the hotel for that sweet sweet FFP boost but kept the revenue stream by giving the club the management contract. It’s just another demonstration of the rules being utterly broken.

To add on, PSGs losses (inclusive of related party inflated sponsors) total 600m euro over the last 3 years. Being in the club is fantastic.

Basically we can’t spend anything under the new rules we would have to sell unless we can increase our revenue.

Thanks for sharing this, your absolutely right a very rare 13 mins well spent with talk sport. no wonder they just keep spending with abandon though, especially if they are just going to flip none football assets to the owners to cover any shortfall. FFP for you but not for me.

Kelly and Tosin are no brainers.

Mgw would be stupid expensive.

He was exceptional in what should have been an extremely difficult game for him, massive performance.

Hopefully not, we can’t be spending so much of our budget on players and loaning them out, we need him up to speed and contributing

Hard to say, against teams which aren’t totally mental he won’t get half as much space as he was afforded against Kamikaze ange.

The actually funniest thing about this is the media reporting about how cheap wage wise these signings were, wage bill

Massive win that, all credit in the world to the lads and the Gaffa in particular, made them look average. Also, it's glorious to watch such a high risk game plan be punished so brutally.

This ref can get fucked blatant yellow.

I could be wrong here but the only reason we would need to move on a temporary basis would be either a total rebuild or renovation on a massive scale? With those factors considered I wouldn’t spend too much time thinking about playing at the SOL

Froggy, your sir Jim basically tried to make us look like mugs with his relentlessly stupid public statements, I get it though, he’s your savour so your impression will differ. Now, our demands are set by us, what we gave Brighton have no bearing on anything, ultimately your clubs past behaviour has and how you’ve handled this affair means we should give you absolutely no leeway and he can sit in his garden until January.

Aye, I’ve just had a satisfying lunch here in Singapore as well. But ditto on the time of the day having no bearing on my assessments. and again, just to be clear I’d like nothing more than to be totally wrong

Good morning to you Mr Hopium.

Absolutely Cuba, I don’t think anyone is in denial are they? I think what most are saying is don’t entertain giving those arrogant fucks any form or discount and let him wait until January.

Anyways, as we are both seemingly questioning the stated goals, what do you think they really are? Ride the valuation up and wait for the correct moment to exit? More of a traditional investment?

Personally no, but it was accepted as it’s always been the way the little woods family jack walker general franco etc.

I thought I was going mad, glad I wasn’t the only one who noticed this. on a practical level, I don’t see how we can challenge rules our owners have voted for either.