r0cafella

I don't think he's the answer for us at all personally. Better suited to teams who play with a back 3. (He's too weak aerially in a back 4 imo)

He isn't close to Miley in terms or where he is currently at or ceiling imo.

We have a cup competition with this feature. It wouldn't be a good idea to allow kids to play in our lower leagues though. We have plenty of teams in the pyramid without the need for it

Correct, very high rated TBF and still very young

It's how they have the undoubted best sources isn't it? But it has and continues to get worse they glaze everything and everyone

Was listening to an athletic podcast earlier and they were glazing him to high heaven. They obviously don't listen to the amount of absolute shit he spouts.

What Eddie did was absolutely hilarious. Basically fuck off I'm not dealing with that kick it over to Ash worth. Really bad for the structure as the should have been united but hilarious as ashworth is a rat cunt.

I'm absolutely here for Froggy Vs Kaka like.

Half a billion on what?

Who will end up at Villa?

That's what my thought was. How can that be possible? At the time he signed he was very much in the unproven will he make won't he make it bracket. A club like forest giving him 100k per week would be mental.

Everyone's favourite Journalist Ornstein saying this lad is on over a 100k per week at forest. I don't that extremely hard to believe personally like.

I wouldn't say I've written him off, but ultimately it was a short term signing and if it doesn't pay off then it's really expensive.

I said it at the time it was a terrible deal and got shouted down. We really needed his performances to get us CL to make it "worth it" massive gamble.

We probably can sell Ramsey this summer and make an accounting profit. Plus I wouldn't have signed him either but that's not the point. From a financial POV it's very low risk as long as we can hold. Wissa is the problematic one.

It's not though is it? It's simply the reality of football Bruno is a bad example because his remaining book value means we'd double our money on him at least. Don't get me wrong you need experience too but ultimately one of our biggest current flaws is we will be actively getting nothing back on a lot of players we've paid money for. These will require money to replace. The mackems have zero ambition so they have nothing to worry about it. They will be content to survive so players like Xhaka are perfectly fine for them. Same thing Ramsey even if he'd bad we sell him in 3 years and make an accounting profit.

We can't sell him yet. Nobody is paying us 44m which is his book value in the summer.

They basically have the opposite approach to us. But emery is very much a systems guy plug the profile in and it's off you go.

It's very difficult for us to take risk which is precisely why we needed to be multi club ages ago. You take risks elsewhere and sell yourself the sure things. Talent development requires massive infrastructure these days and we've left that to our former back up goal keeper to sort.

Yeah but we can't afford players who don't have resale value. It's why players who can appreciate in value are priced at such premiums.

Actually it's another thing we can blame PSR for. I mean I see our right wing slot and I think Jarrod Bowen would be perfect then I snap back to reality and PSR makes it a none starter. Ultimately the system in place means transfer targets converge. Everyone wants the same boring profile of player.

Either way we are likely stuck with him for the next 18 months at least. His book value will be 44m in the summer

Literally zero upside. He wouldn't guarantee anything.

Aye, it's a massive concern. He looks more like a potential impact player than an upgrade.

It's obviously counterproductive to get on his back however his output has been underpar.