-
Posts
15,561 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Bimpy474
-
That's also a load of bollocks. In terms of style of football it isn't, we're boring and fucking awful to watch but managed to win games by scoring quite a few. Baffling to be honest how we managed it with the way we set up.
-
Dummett please just fuck off you useless bag of shit.
-
Get an attacker on Rafa we are losing ffs. 2-0 down and still one striker and two holding players.
-
I don't understand Gouffran's role in the team, he offers nothing go forward. A utter waste of a shirt. Hahaha Gouffran gives away a dumb free kick and 1-0.
-
We haven't scored direct from a free kick for a while now.
-
And little fucking hobbit at RB can feck off as well.
-
Dummett is awful, utterly awful.
-
Jesus we are so fucking boring, i suppose the end will justify the means.
-
Nope Leeds ungood Friday.
-
We can't pass the fucking thing ten yards to each other, absolutely abysmal.
-
Generous, it was fucking turd.
-
Ritchie gets in in ten yards of space, hold on to it and turn ffs.
-
Diame didn't leave his foot in, he clearly slipped you fucking nugget.
-
What a superb dive.
-
They want to stop bad tackles, yet give a yellow for six studs up late tackle.
-
Gameweek 32 Tottenham 3-0 Watford Man City 3-0 Hull Middlesbrough 1-1 Burnley Stoke 1-2 Liverpool West Brom 1-1 Southampton West Ham 1-1 Swansea Bournemouth 0-2 Chelsea Sunderland 0-2 Man Utd Everton 2-1 Leicester Crystal Palace 1-2 Arsenal Sheff Wed 0-0 Newcastle
-
What a shit dive by Murray
-
What a save ffs.
-
Everything you want in a player, good quality, hard work, passion, will to win, goals, assists. Love him.
-
That's not what he meant though, if I'm reading things correctly. Shearergol is saying that if the pen is put wide or in the back of the net, it doesn't matter if there is an encroachment. If we scored as we did, Gayles encroachment should have meant a retake. If Ritchie had missed but a Burton player had encroached then it should have been retaken, if Ritchie had scored when a Burton player had encroached it should have stood. Players from both teams encroaching means a retake. The rules are understood. What I mean is Gayle's encroachment had no impact on the penalty. Had the penalty been saved and Gayle scored the rebound, that in my opinion is when the rule should be applied. I'm not doubting what the rule is, I'm stating what I think it should be. I know what you mean to be fair but personally i actually agree with this rule, or players will bomb in the box all the time before the ball is struck. Which wouldn't matter unless the ball rebounds. Suppose it might put the keeper or taker off though. I can understand that bit as well, it seems ok in practice but just wouldn't look or seem right imo. I think it's one of the more sensible rules actually, and funnily enough one of the few they can't feck around with. Hopefully.