Bimpy474

Harsh on Conjo like, he was only saying.

27 games down, only 19 goals conceded....so not us but i love it as defender all my footballing life.

Hahaha feckin auto spelling

Top class manager, he's deserves so much praise it's mental. Love him.

Very Arsenal last season this, never looked like losing.

If we could take half the easy chances we make we'd be so many points better off, and i say that as we sit 5th

Yeah for £70m each and the goofy twat will still moan they can't compete, and about how unfair it is other clubs are allowed to spend two bob. Wanker, him not you

Chelsea 2-0 Villa West Ham 2-1 Southampton Newcastle 1-1 Man United Everton 1-3 Spurs Bournemouth 1-1 Brighton Leeds 2-1 Forest Leicester 2-1 Villa Chelsea 2-1 Liverpool Man United 2-0 Brentford West Ham 1-1 Newcastle

I've said this before but he's not a holding player, he's a box to box player as we're seeing. Using him to sit in front of the defence takes too much away from his game.

The movement was everything in those goals, such fluid interchanging. Not unlike what Eddie is trying to implement now. At the moment though, Almiron/Wilson and ASM/Murphy don't have the ability Ba and Hatem had obviously. But Isak's certainly does, so much to looked forward too.

Yeah no wonder Dan Fucking Gosling and The Mekon were better choices than that lazy oik, fuck football being enjoyable. Pardew, what a class act he wasn't.

Because the manager has never taken a risk in his life, the boring beige tosser.

Da fuck is the twat doing there, Pickford is such a divvy.

No offence but we need to being aiming higher than a Man Utd reserve. Actually, fuck him, fuck Man Utd the wankstain shithouse cunt of a club, he can fuck right off. PS. If he signed like all hypocrites I'll cheer him on with gay abandon.

Very true Still mad as a box of frogs suggestion.

I think you need the lay off the coffee or hard drugs, well whichever one made you come up with that madness.

I'm not sure why there's been so much controversy over the Man Utd game. Willian clearly handballs it, defo red. Light push or not Mitrovic cannot and must not ever touch a ref in that kind of aggressive manner, clear red. Silva, completely in the wrong over the penalty, red for dissent. Not sure what the fuss is, all those decision were correct, it pains me to say it as it was Manure mind.

The second clearance attempt that's being overlooked. The ball never went direct to Longstaff, it went to their player to clear it into Longstaff. Whatever our opinions on the merits of offside/onside, active/inactive etc. The law now means we had a perfectly good goal ruled out, and the officials on the pitch and in the VAR room showed their ineptitude, it's just a shambles.

Felipe didn't intentionally play it toward Longstaff he was blocking/intercepting the ball. At no stage was Dennis was offside, and Botman was passing the ball back to Pope, the two incidents aren't comparable imo. Just my opinion mate.

I know the law mate but the active/non active is daft in the area like that. That's my opinion of offside, i think it's a step too far in trying to eradicate daft offside decisions, as it turns out that was a daft offside decision according the law now

It was what Isak said that Navas knew he'd take it, then Tripps too the ball to keep Navas away from him. Whatever the situation i've never enjoyed such shithousing as much as now

For me Longstaff gains the advantage being beyond the defence. I find it weird that if it's deflected to he's OK and not ruled as active, but if a players blocks (plays at) a shot or pass then he's active. What's the point of a line if a player can just stand yards off, and if a defender plays at a pass he's onside, for me that's just ridiculous.

I think what's most worrying about the officials in our country is that they got the law wrong, not something like was it a dive or was there enough contact etc. They got the law wrong, that's just unforgivable really and shows how incompetent our officiating is.

How that can be ruled onside is ridiculous, that's where tweaking the offside law is detrimental to the game. How on earth can the defender know if Salah hasn't run from an onside position, he has to play at the ball he cannot know Salah was offside from the initial pass. Just a shambles by the fucktards who decide and make those changes.

If the ball is deflected by a Forest player with no intent to play the ball then Longstaff is offside. It was clearly played at by the Forest player so Longstaff should be ruled onside. I still think that's a bullshit law as Longstaff should be ruled offside in either case, but as the law stands he wasn't and the officials got it wrong. And something seemingly overlooked is the ball was played at twice by Forest players. Just piss poor interpretation by piss poor officials.