SweMag

His agent is Patrick Mörk. A well-known agent in Sweden. Patrick Mörk said it was chief scout Steve Nickson and head coach Steve Bruce who convinced NUFC to spend the extra cash on Emil Krafth to get him signed. The day before he signed, his agent got a SMS from NUFC saying ”deal on” sort of and the contract was agreed short after.

Why are they signing a 20-years old player who recently played in level 7 of the French league system?

We are heavily linked with right-sided defender/wingback Emil Krafth from Amiens in the French Ligue 1 and some journalists over there says the deal is almost done. According to himself his best position is at right wingback with freedom to join the attack. Always looking to improve his game, has good technique and strenght. But remember, he struggled at Bologna and is second choice at right back in the Swedish national team after Mikael Lustig... I think he’s in the same category as Yedlin and Manquillo.

What exactly did he do well? I watched the game and he did nothing. Some poor passes in the final third and kept running down players giving stupid fouls away.

I really hope you're not being serious According to the bookies.

I watched it, don’t know why. Awful, just awful. Surprised we didn’t conceded more goals. Could have been 6-0. Darlow, Colback, Shelvey, Lazaar, Sterry and Aarons all with very poor performances. Hayden was decent.

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/sport/football/news/phil-hodgkinson-explains-late-delays-16524572

The BZG have no power to ”keep” him. It’s against the PRL rules (I recently read).

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'. But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before? The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago. He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him. Really? Where? On his twitter feed. No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it It’s litterally on the page you are posting on. Tweet from 5th June, you quoted it Yes. Of course. That I know. I thought LV was talking about the cropped ”Heads of Terms” image.

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'. But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before? The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago. He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him. Really? Where? On his twitter feed. No. I just spent 10 minutes looking through it

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'. But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before? The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago. He first posted it a few weeks ago. It’s not new from him. Really? Where?

Mitch said all along that the Companies House thing had to be related because the project was called 'Project Monochrome'. But why reveal ”Project Monochrome” after the company was created and not mention it before? The ”Heads of Terms” cropped document he posted have I seen on Twitter before. Two weeks ago.