nbthree3

This guy

You can definitely make out the old Newcastle United lettering as well as the Sports Direct

Live tweeting it all then

The Times: "By the time Ashley sold Newcastle United to a consortium funded by Saudi Arabia’s public investment fund (PIF) in October, there were said to be 107 red and blue Sports Direct signs scattered around the stadium. "When Newcastle fans return to a stadium finally free from Sports Direct signs — the club earned £157,000 per year in the last accounts from the advertising — there will be rejoicing. It really is that significant. "It was something that Ashley could never change, but it was neglected — the only significant development across his 14 years of ownership was the installation of one giant television screen that was declared unsafe and caused the kick-off to be delayed for a Premier League match with Leicester City in 2014. "There is a Twitter account for a dead pigeon that has been stuck in the roof of the Gallowgate End for years. It was unloved — the ground and the pigeon — by the owners, but not by supporters. Few nice bits in there

He must have seen the tweets where Adam mentioned he was coming up

One of the more tackier signs gone

Can someone find if we've seen this pic before? I don't remember it

Why didn't Law mention this in his original piece

Obviously we've briefed he hasn't been offered the role now

Matt Law's obviously very close to Emenalo so it wouldn't be too far-fetched a shout to presume he's the source, putting interest forward and fronting a rejection

It's fine if he doesn't know copyright law if he admitted he was in the wrong and ideally done what she says above before tweeting the signatures picture. The problem's been created so resolve it unless we're after a legal scrap

People have a conspiracy theory that Jones is personally responsible for having him excluded. Flip back to May and Jones was the hero... but as soon as Bruce leaves Jones becomes the scapegoat

The 20 Premier League clubs want an emergency meeting this week to outline their stance in opposition to the independent regulator proposed in Tracey Crouch MP’s government-led review, and row back on what many see as chief executive Richard Masters’ acceptance of it. The clubs’ chief executives and chairs have been involved in intensive back-channel discussion via a WhatsApp group set-up around the time that doubts began to emerge around the now departed Premier League chairman Gary Hoffman - and they are clear that they do not want an independent regulator for football. The opposition is chiefly coming from mid-table clubs not regularly involved in European football, like West Ham, Crystal Palace and Villa, as well as Brighton and Hove Albion. All of them believed that they were going to take a collective stance against the regulator principle. The Premier League executive said that it had proposed a meeting in its notes to the clubs last week to discuss the review. However, there is a strong sentiment within the clubs outside the elite that many of the proposals could cause major problems – not least in attracting new owners and investors. Parish wrote in The Sunday Times of proposals to investigate family connections of potential investors, “Wow, that's some power – ‘You can't buy something because I don't like your friends’. Sounds more like something from North Korea.”