InspectorCoarse

Fans should occupy the grounds until owners relent

Fuck the Super League bs and fuck the PL . Go back to 92 league clubs 4 divisions , John Motson commentating etc - no play offs , you get third in division 2 etc you get promoted . That or id rather the whole fucking disgrace that football has become just imploded and fans found something more meaningful to do with their time and money . Oh and fuck players becoming multi millionaires - let them run a pub or sell insurance like Geoff Hurst and countless others had to do

https://twitter.com/Thebluerooms_/status/1383856812911255554?s=20

I love the smell of arbitration in the morning ... it smells like ... victory

Ours would be falling to bits with Bruce like gravy stains on bearing the legend " 17th Forever "

Would it be conspiratorial thinking to wonder whether NUST mooting this project means they don't have total faith in PIF / PCP deal going through ?

I think Candi Hills meant Hurst wants to get back in the ground asap and give MA his season ticket money

Alex Hurst can't wait

Greg : What would you expect owning 1% of the club would give fans as regards how the club is run ? What decisions could they reasonably be expected to have a say on ?

The money will be safe enough thats the responsibility of the Guardians not the board . For all i think its pie in the sky its hard to impugn their motives re £££

Its different from saying it might work to i dont believe it will - at least theres a modicum of belief in the first statement

Its definitely not sane to say you dont believe it will work but will go ahead anyway - at least have some faith if you're getting involved

Definition of insanity ...

As i said ...

Reality is they will have no say and the idea that the NUST would relay every desicion to a vote by NUST members is both unworkable and laughable . They will expect that NUST board members will be making those desicions on fans behalf . Its more about raising the profile of NUST and aggrandisement of its board members

So whats the point if having ownership of a small stake gives fans no real power within the club ? Its exactly as i said - good pr and nothing more

Woop dee doo

I'll quote you again back to yourself . You are saying that in reality NUST / fans would have no real influence ( under no illusions ) So its really about good pr and fans feeling good about the club and themselves - nothing more .

Lol Shearer will stick exactly £ 1 in : )

Exactly , it would just be pr puff , not anything where fans would have a real say in the club . If fans want to fund this go right ahead but it amounts to very little in the final analysis . Chasing rainbows is all it is

Yes but its not real involvement or " truly involved " is it ? What you are describing is the use of fans as a stage army when needed for pr purposes . The first time NUSTs fantasy of fan involvement ever goes up against the needs of the actual owners then people would see the real nature of ownership and where power lies ...

So no real involvement in the running of the club just good pr ... and John Halls " a seat for every pocket " bollocks ? or when fans were moved against their will to other parts of the ground ? Aye , reet ...