et tu brute

What the fuck game was he watching

That all come from Barker losing it. Totally in cruise control until then.

Still think Hayles is a weak link and is just looking around with no anticipation to get to the ball. Been the better team in all the games so far, but a lack of a decent striker will cost them long term imo. Just checked on the groom and because they're getting to beat they have resorted to the standard of football in the women's game.

Duplo is lego just made for you kids, it's not that much cheaper either as I often find with my young grandkid

It was never only a couple of tweaks, I honestly couldn't understand some people thinking it was. Man City have the Premier League by the absolute balls

The current rules are anti-competitive and the premier league are as corrupt as they come.

You don't take any notice of that bald twat

That won't bother Man City one little bit.

You're taking in too much by the Premier League's usual corrupt shite. Man City put it plain and simple yesterday, that what the PL are stating in their statementis far from the actual picture. The PL voted on these rules also, but it didn't stop City taking the legal route and they will again. You're massively off the mark here and that will be shown. City stated in their statement that this applies to the original rules also: "The Tribunal found that both the original APT rules and the current, (amended) APT Rules violate UK competition law and violate the requirements of procedural fairness".

Oh it does very much so

Man City have got the Premier League by the balls as they will just turn to the legal route with anything they deem as not fit. Not be only APT rules which will be challenged either, this is just the start.

I hope it does as the rules have been found to be unlawful (even on one point if found true, but it's three points according to City). As a result currently those rules in APT have to be null and void until either corrected or removed. This is just the start

If Man City's claims are right (I fully believe they will be), then it's going to blow the whole lot up. This won't be the only thing that comes to the forefront and about time

Not according to City.

So if parts are unlawful then it is unlawful. Let's see the changes though as we both agree

Let's see then

Why don't we wait and see what the actual rule changes are. Man City's statement and Nick de Marco are indicating it's significant and in Man City's case they are stating that the APT rules were found unlawful and these were the original rules not only the one's in February. Only way to find out for sure is when the new rule or amendment is published. You don't cancel a meeting and then arrange an emergency meeting for minor changes

And yet Nick de Marco called it significant. I know who I'd rather believe. Let's see who is the winner. Read Man City's statement

Maybe or maybe not as Saudis Arabia FMV will be different to the UK and if knocked will certainly be legally challenged. That doesn't change the fact the tribunal ruled that APT was unlawful

No the tribunal judged that APT was unlawful

Of course it is, I honestly don't understand how anyone cannot see that. The APT rules have been deemed unlawful and have to be changed ; and I would be gobsmacked if the changes were not significant, with the changes not being changed deemed as insignificant, despite the Premier League's words.

Still got to be changed for APT being unlawful and that is certainly not minor. For a start FMV will be a lot different in Saudia Arabia than it will be in the UK. Aye the premier league really going to knock back a sponsorship from a Saudi company and face the high likelihood now they will be straight in court. The Premier League are full of shite and Masters and co will certainly try to downplay things. Time will tell though, but I disagree with your thinking

Any reference to APT has to be taking out of the rules as it' unlawful or the rules amended to match up with UK law