Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down What bail conditions has he broke? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down What bail conditions? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? so he didnt do it then? neither did OJ SIMPSON lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down No i'm not on glue, perhaps i was being too direct when i said that i seriously doubt he will go to prison, for me it could lean either way but provocation can reduce any kind of sentence given. If he did actually go to prison though he would only get a few months. I just don't think a court will send down a footballer for afew months when they know he has plenty of money to pay hefty fines and can do plenty of community service activities, instead of filling prisons even more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down What bail conditions has he broke? the ones that say you cant eat a big mac then start wedging folk. no matter what the provocation. if it was legal we would have coppers countrywide knocking the crap out of revellers. he should have placed them under citizens arrest Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down What bail conditions has he broke? the ones that say you cant eat a big mac then start wedging folk. no matter what the provocation. if it was legal we would have coppers countrywide knocking the crap out of revellers. he should have placed them under citizens arrest He still hasn't broken any bail conditions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 but they will in joeys case lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. Fair enough. I can't see it particularly helping him though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous The judge does when sentencing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous The judge does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 he is fucked if there are free copies of the Daily Mail in the Jury's waiting room Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Max Clifford as part of the defence. and he might be able to sue Macdonalds for all that shite they put in their burgers. could be some sort of nut allergy he suffered Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous The judge does when sentencing. reread i said the jury Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 the way the judicial system works. probaly make him mayor of liverpool zero tolerance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous The judge does when sentencing. reread i said the jury I know what you said, the point is the Judge decides punishment and he is aware of any previous that the convicted has. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down No i'm not on glue, perhaps i was being too direct when i said that i seriously doubt he will go to prison, for me it could lean either way but provocation can reduce any kind of sentence given. If he did actually go to prison though he would only get a few months. I just don't think a court will send down a footballer for afew months when they know he has plenty of money to pay hefty fines and can do plenty of community service activities, instead of filling prisons even more. Why treat him differently to any other person just because hes a footballer means jack shit in my eyes What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous i think warren barton will be known to a lot of people who have no interest in football who maybe on a jury Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous The judge does when sentencing. reread i said the jury I know what you said, the point is the Judge decides punishment and he is aware of any previous that the convicted has. the jury have to find the accused guilty though,before the judge can pass any form of sentance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous The judge does when sentencing. reread i said the jury I know what you said, the point is the Judge decides punishment and he is aware of any previous that the convicted has. the jury have to find the accused guilty though,before the judge can pass any form of sentance Yes, I do know that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taff2727 Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down No i'm not on glue, perhaps i was being too direct when i said that i seriously doubt he will go to prison, for me it could lean either way but provocation can reduce any kind of sentence given. If he did actually go to prison though he would only get a few months. I just don't think a court will send down a footballer for afew months when they know he has plenty of money to pay hefty fines and can do plenty of community service activities, instead of filling prisons even more. Why treat him differently to any other person just because hes a footballer means jack s*** in my eyes What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous i think warren barton will be known to a lot of people who have no interest in football who maybe on a jury he only nicked a car with bobby lee man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Somebody has made a decision to remand him is custody, that decision will have been made for 1 of 2 reasons. Firstly they may think he'll do a runner to try and avoid going to court. Or, they think he's a danger to society. His half brother did a runner so they may think he'd also try and avoid going to court, he's got enough cash to go anywhere, my guess is the second, they think he's a danger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 Has barton played his last game for the toon ,i think he has and good riddance a horrible little excuse for a human being I seriously doubt he will actually, if his story that his attack was provoked is true he probably won't get any form of a sentence, just a fine. Are you on glue!! His latest escapade was no doubt provoked, but he is already on bail awaiting the Dabo case (that alone could result in a sentence) which was adjourned a couple of weeks ago. No judge or magistrate is going to go easy on him now that he has broken those bail conditions. He going down No i'm not on glue, perhaps i was being too direct when i said that i seriously doubt he will go to prison, for me it could lean either way but provocation can reduce any kind of sentence given. If he did actually go to prison though he would only get a few months. I just don't think a court will send down a footballer for afew months when they know he has plenty of money to pay hefty fines and can do plenty of community service activities, instead of filling prisons even more. Why treat him differently to any other person just because hes a footballer means jack s*** in my eyes What has gone on before that he's actually been found guilty of? NOTHING APART FROM MISSING THE ASHTRAY WITH HIS CIGAR That didn't go to court so won't even be mentioned. Anything else? Has he been found guilty of anything in court before? What's your point though? My point is people are going on about his previous activities that have been well publicised in the papers but the courts only take into account things he's been found guilty of in court previously. not in crown court. the jury has no idea of an accused previous i think warren barton will be known to a lot of people who have no interest in football who maybe on a jury he only nicked a car with bobby lee man cannot believe i did that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now