Guest Redcar Mag Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Doubts cast over Shearer's Newcastle return Kevin Keegan, whose first match back in charge at Newcastle produced an anti-climactic 0-0 draw yesterday, has lifted the lid on his rift with Alan Shearer and admitted he fears he has caused a major problem between the pair by not appearing for Shearer's testimonial in 2006 - one that may stop them working together. Shearer was deeply hurt by the non-appearance of the man who persuaded him to snub Manchester United to move to Newcastle 10 years earlier. That Keegan was also the only significant figure from his career not to pen an article for the tribute programme similarly drove a wedge between the duo. Keegan has spoken for the first time about a friendship that has been severely damaged because of the snub, and revealed he plans to offer an olive branch to repair their relationship. However, perhaps significantly, he has distanced himself from suggestions that Shearer could be handed the No 2 role as part of his new management team at St James' Park. Keegan, who took over on Wednesday, has still to determine his entire staff, although his former manager, Arthur Cox, was added to the club's payroll on Friday. Yet it seems now that the best Shearer will be offered is a part-time coaching role under the new regime. The fact that Shearer is due to set off on a business trip to Africa today further complicates matters. He has also been told by Newcastle chairman Chris Mort that he will need to take over at another club before he is even considered for the manager's role in the future. "I'd like to think there is no animosity there, but if you are asking me if Alan rings me as much as he used to do then no, he doesn't," revealed Keegan. "I couldn't come to Alan's testimonial (against Celtic) because I was on a family holiday in the States. Things like that, sadly, may have affected him, but it hasn't affected me and I want to talk with him and I will. It's possibly true that it did offend him in some way, but for me to fly all the way from America…I wouldn't have expected him to do that for me. But maybe I'm thinking like I think and maybe it did offend him. "If it did, I would have thought that we are great friends. For all his playing career, and from the minute I met him and signed him in David Platt's farmhouse in Cheshire, we had a fantastic relationship and a very honest one. Yes we are two people who say what we think, but that's good. I will talk to Alan first, but if that is the reason he doesn't ring me any more then that disappoints me, but I'll ring him and ask him. He's not rung me, but then I've been out of the game a while and he's on the telly. "If Alan doesn't see himself as a No 2 then he's not going to come here, is he? What am I going to fetch him as, joint manager? If he says to me, I don't want to be No 2, and that is his line, then there really isn't any point having a long conversation. I think there is an involvement for Alan Shearer at this football club and that involvement at this moment could be on his terms. "I know he has other obligations and commitments to the BBC. It is a promise and a commitment, so it might be that we can chat about it. What a fantastic player to have around the club and help people in the art of goalscoring and finishing and just talking to players. "But if he can't be there on a Saturday because he has to do TV work, then you can't even think of him as a No 2. I will probably say to him, 'I'm here now, do you see any role for yourself?' Mort's opinion has further complicated a delicate issue between two strong-willed figures. He insists Shearer must get experience to become the next Newcastle manager, though Keegan believes he is his perfect successor. "Alan ticks a lot of boxes but he's not yet done it as a manager," said Mort. "I would be more comfortable about Alan managing this club if he has more managerial experience under his belt. I'd say this to Alan, and I have said it to him." Keegan revealed he would not have returned to St James' Park if the Halls and Shepherds had still been in control. Both families were bought out in Mike Ashley's takeover and when he was asked if he would be manager if they were still running the club, he said: "No. That doesn't mean to say I don't respect them. If you talk about the way it finished, then it was disappointing. Sir John Hall couldn't even be bothered to come back and say goodbye to me." Keegan, despite his row with the player he paid a world record £15?million for, does believe Shearer will inherit his position. He added: "I had a conversation with Alan when he was in his last year at the club - I think we were playing golf somewhere - and we were talking about management and the manager's job at Newcastle came up, as it always does. And I said to him 'It will come for you one day, you don't have to go looking for it'." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jhtml;jsessionid=CAVGY2F5V1VW1QFIQMGSFF4AVCBQWIV0?xml=/sport/2008/01/20/sfnfro120.xml Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 This article would have fetched the author's desired controversy if it had been published before MOTD. Shearer's already said that he had a long conversation with Keegan. The quotes don't mean that much imo, doesn't really tell us anything new. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Why should we assume that Shearer and Keegan should have kept in constant contact with each other just because Keegan signed him as a player. How many people move on from jobs and dont keep in regular contact with their ex-work colleagues ? They only knew each other for what.... a few months, and then for a short time during KK's England days, so they were hardly childhood best mates were they? There could be something in the testimonial thing but only Alan can answer that. Really depends on how he feels about things like that. The article in the programme. Does it say that KK refused or was even asked? All it says is that he didnt write an article. Doesnt mean to say that he didnt want to. Personally I cant believe that he wouldnt have written something if asked but as ever we can only guess. Does seem funny that he was the only major figure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 It either happens or it doesn't happen, i doubt it has too much effect on the club and its immediate future. The way the press are going on you'd think were going to all cry and SJP explode into a million pieces if Shearer doesn't come in as no2. I really don't care, i was more interested in Coleman tbh, i think that would of been ideal. We should look for a foreign tactician, someone who doesn't have the confidence to manage but knows shed loads about the game. Bit like Ten Cate, but obviously not a prolific. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
garth Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 I think it's a good thing Shearer won't be getting the #2 job, I really can't see Shearer being number two for to long and that would cause only problems for the Club and the team. Morte is absolutely correct in saying he needs to Manage another club before being even considered for the Newcastle job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 I thought that conversation with Lineker on MOTD was a bit awkward, but it needed to be said. I'm sure if he hadn't come straight out about the fact that he's going to be in Africa for the next week, we'd have heard stories like "Shearer sensationaly snubs Keegan for entire week!" from the papers. They'll talk, if it's the right move for Keegan and Mort, he'll be back. Simple as. The media are way off on this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Logic Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 Mort :glasses8: says Shearer needs some experience at managing, and maybe he does, maybe he doesn't. Keegan certainly never had any experience the first time. Mort :glasses8: never had any experience at being a football club chairman either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 That smiley with the megaphone is class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydazzla Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 can't be arsed to read another speculative newspaper article about the future of NUFC. Journalists are generally a bunch of bullshitting cunts so I am sceptical about anything they publish. At the end of the day Shearer says him and Keegan have spoken and things will be sorted at the end of the week. I saw him say it so I believe it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 20, 2008 Share Posted January 20, 2008 If Shearer doesn't want the number 2 position then it's not the end of the world. It would be a nice bit of experience for him and a good figure to have around the club, but if they aren't keen on working together then it shouldn't be forced. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now