Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest guinness_fiend

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

 

We can only hope.

 

This transfer window could be Mike Ashley's masterstroke - do not spend anything, let everyone else bankrupt themselves and get points deducted etc. and then win the league by proxy.  I'd take it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

I think they are spending on the basis they'll be champions league side next year.  Could go horribly wrong......... or right if you hate them like I do.

 

I think Spurs are perfectly safe to be honest - they spend what they make, dbt free so they can balance out tranfsers against revenue pretty effectively, no interest on debts etc...they're also being backed by Joe Lewis of ENIC so they've got a benefactory owner as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest teepee

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

 

We can only hope.

 

This transfer window could be Mike Ashley's masterstroke - do not spend anything, let everyone else bankrupt themselves and get points deducted etc. and then win the league by proxy.  I'd take it!

 

or a slightly more moderat version of this - let spurs etc go ballistic in their early spending spree, and then slowly secure our other targets without this media hysteria....

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

 

Some friends of mine, who's spurs-fans, can't stop talking about how much dough they got..

 

They will make that money back when they sell Berbatov anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

 

Some friends of mine, who's spurs-fans, can't stop talking about how much dough they got..

 

They will make that money back when they sell Berbatov anyway.

 

Not if they start offering him around other clubs, if the likes of ManU get a sniff that Spurs want to sell the price will be dampened abit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest shaun11177

Joe Ledley of Cardiff looked a good left winger.

Fazio is a young Argentine i think centre back and plays a bit for Sevilla.

The right winger for recently relegated Zaragoza-Sergio Garcia.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

I think they are spending on the basis they'll be champions league side next year.  Could go horribly wrong......... or right if you hate them like I do.

 

I think Spurs are perfectly safe to be honest - they spend what they make, dbt free so they can balance out tranfsers against revenue pretty effectively, no interest on debts etc...they're also being backed by Joe Lewis of ENIC so they've got a benefactory owner as well.

 

You sure about that?

 

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Tottenham-Hotspur_340013.html

 

Looks to be around £30m to me. This Spurs fan's site has them with £10m in the bank in 2006:

 

http://www.football-finances.org.uk/spurs/debt2.htm

 

Slippery slope IYAM.  :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Would have thought with Hughton going we would be watching defenders?

Why, is he just the Assistant Manager of the defence now?

 

no but he isnt assistant manager at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

I think they are spending on the basis they'll be champions league side next year.  Could go horribly wrong......... or right if you hate them like I do.

 

I think Spurs are perfectly safe to be honest - they spend what they make, dbt free so they can balance out tranfsers against revenue pretty effectively, no interest on debts etc...they're also being backed by Joe Lewis of ENIC so they've got a benefactory owner as well.

 

You sure about that?

 

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Tottenham-Hotspur_340013.html

 

Looks to be around £30m to me. This Spurs fan's site has them with £10m in the bank in 2006:

 

http://www.football-finances.org.uk/spurs/debt2.htm

 

Slippery slope IYAM.   :razz:

 

Im not sure i understand either site to be honest- Forbes has us down as having a 43% debt to value ratio. I thought we were debt free, also it says Spurs are £10m in the black on the other site, no suggestin of debt there? Am i being really stupid here.... :blush:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Would have thought with Hughton going we would be watching defenders?

Why, is he just the Assistant Manager of the defence now?

 

no but he isnt assistant manager at all

yes he is

 

"NEWCASTLE United assistant boss Chris Hughton has revealed the secret behind the Kevin Keegan-led renaissance"

 

http://www.journallive.co.uk/nufc/newcastle-united-news/2008/05/03/keegan-s-brought-back-fun-at-united-61634-20856679/

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

I think they are spending on the basis they'll be champions league side next year.  Could go horribly wrong......... or right if you hate them like I do.

 

I think Spurs are perfectly safe to be honest - they spend what they make, dbt free so they can balance out tranfsers against revenue pretty effectively, no interest on debts etc...they're also being backed by Joe Lewis of ENIC so they've got a benefactory owner as well.

 

You sure about that?

 

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Tottenham-Hotspur_340013.html

 

Looks to be around £30m to me. This Spurs fan's site has them with £10m in the bank in 2006:

 

http://www.football-finances.org.uk/spurs/debt2.htm

 

Slippery slope IYAM.  :razz:

 

Im not sure i understand either site to be honest- Forbes has us down as having a 43% debt to value ratio. I thought we were debt free, also it says Spurs are £10m in the black on the other site, no suggestin of debt there? Am i being really stupid here.... :blush:

 

 

 

2006: +£10m

2007: -£30m

= Spurs running at a loss of £40m / year.  :pow:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

I think they are spending on the basis they'll be champions league side next year.  Could go horribly wrong......... or right if you hate them like I do.

 

I think Spurs are perfectly safe to be honest - they spend what they make, dbt free so they can balance out tranfsers against revenue pretty effectively, no interest on debts etc...they're also being backed by Joe Lewis of ENIC so they've got a benefactory owner as well.

 

You sure about that?

 

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Tottenham-Hotspur_340013.html

 

Looks to be around £30m to me. This Spurs fan's site has them with £10m in the bank in 2006:

 

http://www.football-finances.org.uk/spurs/debt2.htm

 

Slippery slope IYAM.   :razz:

 

Im not sure i understand either site to be honest- Forbes has us down as having a 43% debt to value ratio. I thought we were debt free, also it says Spurs are £10m in the black on the other site, no suggestin of debt there? Am i being really stupid here.... :blush:

 

 

 

2006: +£10m

2007: -£30m

= Spurs running at a loss of £40m / year.  :pow:

 

:thup:

 

Cant see the stats for 2007 so ill take your word!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest f***thepress

Pulis, the Stoke manager has been scouting in France and turned down a player, unnamed who was sold to him as "the next Drogba". Said he would have cost the club a lot of money, but is no better than what they have.

 

Either it's Gomis, or another new Drogba  :lol:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/7404647.stm

 

 

Didnt they already have the new Drogba (Shola) on loan?  :  )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pulis, the Stoke manager has been scouting in France and turned down a player, unnamed who was sold to him as "the next Drogba". Said he would have cost the club a lot of money, but is no better than what they have.

 

Either it's Gomis, or another new Drogba  :lol:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/7404647.stm

 

 

Didnt they already have the new Drogba (Shola) on loan?  :   )

 

Nah, that guy they have on loan is the poor man's Ricketts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pulis, the Stoke manager has been scouting in France and turned down a player, unnamed who was sold to him as "the next Drogba". Said he would have cost the club a lot of money, but is no better than what they have.

 

Either it's Gomis, or another new Drogba  :lol:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/7404647.stm

 

They all look the same don't they.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Stephen927

Pulis, the Stoke manager has been scouting in France and turned down a player, unnamed who was sold to him as "the next Drogba". Said he would have cost the club a lot of money, but is no better than what they have.

 

Either it's Gomis, or another new Drogba  :lol:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/7404647.stm

 

They all look the same don't they.

 

Er...  ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pulis, the Stoke manager has been scouting in France and turned down a player, unnamed who was sold to him as "the next Drogba". Said he would have cost the club a lot of money, but is no better than what they have.

 

Either it's Gomis, or another new Drogba  :lol:

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/stoke_city/7404647.stm

 

They all look the same don't they.

 

Er...  ???

 

Wasn't aimed at you, just the way everyone seems to be the new ...

 

Sorry for the confusion!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest defo

They're going to bankrupt themselves at this rate

I think they are spending on the basis they'll be champions league side next year.  Could go horribly wrong......... or right if you hate them like I do.

 

I think Spurs are perfectly safe to be honest - they spend what they make, dbt free so they can balance out tranfsers against revenue pretty effectively, no interest on debts etc...they're also being backed by Joe Lewis of ENIC so they've got a benefactory owner as well.

 

You sure about that?

 

http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/34/biz_soccer08_Tottenham-Hotspur_340013.html

 

Looks to be around £30m to me. This Spurs fan's site has them with £10m in the bank in 2006:

 

http://www.football-finances.org.uk/spurs/debt2.htm

 

Slippery slope IYAM.  :razz:

 

Im not sure i understand either site to be honest- Forbes has us down as having a 43% debt to value ratio. I thought we were debt free, also it says Spurs are £10m in the black on the other site, no suggestin of debt there? Am i being really stupid here.... :blush:

 

 

 

 

Spurs don't operate at negative financial balance. Every club has liabilities but it's about whether you can balance the books at the end of the season which Spurs do. Mike Ashley removed Newcastle's operating debt when he arrived (around 70 mil I think) so neither club is at risk. It's also very unlikely that Jo Lewis would allow one of his subsidiary companies to go under without bailing them out if it ever came to that. Leeds never had a safety net of any description.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a left-back, how about Joe Mattock from Leicester? Only 17-18, already in the England Under 21s, and can't see Leicester clinging onto him. Can't see him costing silly money and would mean giving Enrique a longer run in the side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...