EthiGeordie Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Alan Shearer lined up for St James' Park return as Mike Ashley nears deal to sell Newcastle By Michael Walker and COLIN YOUNG Last updated at 1:22 AM on 23rd September 2009 * Comments (0) * Add to My Stories Mike Ashley's protracted sale of Newcastle may be reaching a conclusion four months after the beleaguered owner put the club back on the market. There was fresh optimism last night that would-be buyer Barry Moat has found the backing to convince Barclays Bank that he can fund a takeover, which would lead to the return of Alan Shearer to St James' Park as manager. Alan Shearer Back in Toon: Alan Shearer could return as manager Moat has to demonstrate to Shearer that he has money for team building, as well as to buy from Ashley. Newcastle released a statement on Friday saying 'all parties involved are at sale and purchase stage', and now senior staff at the club have been told to brace themselves 'for a big week'. Moat, who is unlikely to pay the £100million asking price, had run into trouble funding his bid when Barclays told him they would not maintain Newcastle's estimated £39m overdraft facility. It was thought Barclays wanted this cut to £25m but it is understood the bank's demand was for the overdraft to be reduced to £10m. Moat has spent the time since trying to find the required investment and now looks to be on the brink of success. mail reporting this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MW Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Here we go again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nige_S5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Moat can't be buying it - the ITK said it was the other lot Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 If the Keegan affair is what is holding the case up then i can see the end in sight. I am astonished KK (if what is wrote is to be believed?) hasnt accepted a smaller sum 4m ish compared to the 8m he is going for. I am not holding my breath Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... SBR sued the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nige_S5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 If the Keegan affair is what is holding the case up then i can see the end in sight. I am astonished KK (if what is wrote is to be believed?) hasnt accepted a smaller sum 4m ish compared to the 8m he is going for. I am not holding my breath Not saying I'm happy about it, but astonished? Would you settle for £4m when there is a good chance you could get £8m? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam1 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... SBR sued the club. I dont post very often, but that has just made me piss my knickers for some reason ;D Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wally_McFool Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... SBR sued the club. I dont post very often, but that has just made me piss my knickers for some reason ;D In which case I hope your name is Samantha and not Samuel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OzzieMandias Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... SBR sued the club. And SBR never broke a contract in his entire career. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... SBR sued the club. And SBR never broke a contract in his entire career. And ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 when Rudd Gullit was sacked, he told Freddy shepherd he didnt want a penny in compensation, for the time ruud gullit was here and for him being inept at his man management, arguing with shearer and not giving rob lee a squad number, i despised the man, i thought he was completely inept in his actions, but for him to walk away without a penny i think that spoke volumes about him, also looking back on it after years to reflect, maybe he saw just how much influence shearer had on the club, yes he is a club legend, but there is many a person said he had far too much influence when he a player. no playe should ever be able to run the team, that is the 'gaffers' job. I think the keegan thing is more of a principal than a money issue, he wants to win this to prove he was correct (not that i am saying i agree with that) but we all know how stubborn Keegan can be lets just hope this is the final issue that is preventing the sale of the club and a line can be drawn under it and we can then move forward Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 when Rudd Gullit was sacked, he told Freddy shepherd he didnt want a penny in compensation, for the time ruud gullit was here and for him being inept at his man management, arguing with shearer and not giving rob lee a squad number, i despised the man, i thought he was completely inept in his actions, but for him to walk away without a penny i think that spoke volumes about him, also looking back on it after years to reflect, maybe he saw just how much influence shearer had on the club, yes he is a club legend, but there is many a person said he had far too much influence when he a player. no playe should ever be able to run the team, that is the 'gaffers' job. I think the keegan thing is more of a principal than a money issue, he wants to win this to prove he was correct (not that i am saying i agree with that) but we all know how stubborn Keegan can be lets just hope this is the final issue that is preventing the sale of the club and a line can be drawn under it and we can then move forward true and fred has always spoke highly of ruud as a man ever since. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 He is really self centered I don't want him closer to this club ever again. A person like SBR or Alan Shearer never do something like this to our Wor club........ NEVER..... Our Wor club? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 when Rudd Gullit was sacked, he told Freddy shepherd he didnt want a penny in compensation, for the time ruud gullit was here and for him being inept at his man management, arguing with shearer and not giving rob lee a squad number, i despised the man, i thought he was completely inept in his actions, but for him to walk away without a penny i think that spoke volumes about him, also looking back on it after years to reflect, maybe he saw just how much influence shearer had on the club, yes he is a club legend, but there is many a person said he had far too much influence when he a player. no playe should ever be able to run the team, that is the 'gaffers' job. I think the keegan thing is more of a principal than a money issue, he wants to win this to prove he was correct (not that i am saying i agree with that) but we all know how stubborn Keegan can be lets just hope this is the final issue that is preventing the sale of the club and a line can be drawn under it and we can then move forward true and fred has always spoke highly of ruud as a man ever since. ..and Fred is a good judge of character..!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Mongo Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 If the Keegan affair is what is holding the case up then i can see the end in sight. I am astonished KK (if what is wrote is to be believed?) hasnt accepted a smaller sum 4m ish compared to the 8m he is going for. I am not holding my breath Astonished? He has the choice between £4M with a strict NDA attached to it and an unknown sum with the right to speak his mind. There's no guarantee that Keegan will get £8M -- if money is all he's after, then declining the £4M is a huge gamble. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elbel1 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 IF Keegan is only after the money then the the thing he will want to avoid is a Non Disclosure Arrangement, then he can put it all in a book which will be worth a good few bob Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 IF Keegan is only after the money then the the thing he will want to avoid is a Non Disclosure Arrangement, then he can put it all in a book which will be worth a good few bob you know that is a point even if it is a bit conspiracy theory Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 This is a cracking conspiracy theory.. that its Keegan's fault that the club hasnt been sold Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 People need to stop treating Keegan like a traitor for taking legal action. What he is doing is taking action against Mike Ashley for being a cunt. He isn't betraying us by sueing Newcastle United. Any money that the club pays out to Keegan will, in one way or another, come out of Ashley's pocket. Mike Ashley brought used Keegan's love of Newcastle United to bring him back here. Then he shat on him from a great height. I don't blame the guy for sueing Ashley, I would! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 This is a cracking conspiracy theory.. that its Keegan's fault that the club hasnt been sold Personally I think it's the fans' fault. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 This is a cracking conspiracy theory.. that its Keegan's fault that the club hasnt been sold not really a conspiracy theory. you'd think the terms etc would change if the finances were to alter by 8 or 10million pound. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 People need to stop treating Keegan like a traitor for taking legal action. What he is doing is taking action against Mike Ashley for being a c***. He isn't betraying us by sueing Newcastle United. Any money that the club pays out to Keegan will, in one way or another, come out of Ashley's pocket. Mike Ashley brought used Keegan's love of Newcastle United to bring him back here. Then he shat on him from a great height. I don't blame the guy for sueing Ashley, I would! it won't come out of ashleys pocket you can count on that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealios Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 People need to stop treating Keegan like a traitor for taking legal action. What he is doing is taking action against Mike Ashley for being a c***. He isn't betraying us by sueing Newcastle United. Any money that the club pays out to Keegan will, in one way or another, come out of Ashley's pocket. Mike Ashley brought used Keegan's love of Newcastle United to bring him back here. Then he shat on him from a great height. I don't blame the guy for sueing Ashley, I would! it won't come out of ashleys pocket you can count on that Yes it will, if its over a certain amount that has already been factored into the price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 People need to stop treating Keegan like a traitor for taking legal action. What he is doing is taking action against Mike Ashley for being a c***. He isn't betraying us by sueing Newcastle United. Any money that the club pays out to Keegan will, in one way or another, come out of Ashley's pocket. Mike Ashley brought used Keegan's love of Newcastle United to bring him back here. Then he shat on him from a great height. I don't blame the guy for sueing Ashley, I would! it won't come out of ashleys pocket you can count on that Yes it will, if its over a certain amount that has already been factored into the price. do you not think the price/terms may change depending on the outcome ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts