jdckelly Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Agents are fucking cretins and are not credible sources..Their profession is based on spreading lies and false information. this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Does it really need to be explained why you should make more of an effort to keep onside one of your best players than one that's surplus to requirements? I give up. So we ignore Barton's behaviour the past couple of months? He's made a few twitter posts man, yes we should just ignore it. We certainly shouldn't f*** with the clubs future and just give the bloke away for free Would your boss ignore it. Regardless of the fact its professional football I know my employers would look dimly on me if I slagged them off in a public domain. My old company withdrew a job offer of an employee because of his negative comments against the company on a message board. Another employee was put on a final warning for critising a business decision made by the directors.buod[ /quote]With all due respect, I doubt it would be a great loss to the company if they were to lay you off (I dont know what you do so im just speculating). Barton is our best right midfielder, and to be fair, we need him next season. "cut your nose off to spite your face" comes to mind, it would be f***ing idiotic to let him go. Wullie – I kind of knew that as I was typing, comparing the real world to football is pretty pointless but I was more trying to make the point that slagging off your employers in a public domain should not be taken lightly. As for me my current employer they probably won’t be that bothered to lose me – I’ve only been there 4 weeks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 leeangus29 angus by nufcfans BARTON'S AGENT TALKING on 5 LIVE! Barton was offered a 3 yr contract but wanted a 4 yr deal @nufcfans #nufc 16 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply But he said on Talksport Joey wasn't offered a contract at all. Ashley and Derek are the only liars as has been proven. Willie McKay is a veritable angel from heaven whose words are nuggets of truth blessed from above. But i heard him say it god dammit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 So his kiddie strop on Twitter was because he wasn't allowed to take any corners on Sunday. And now he's taken to quoting Nietzche. Fucking nutcase. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Any chance we'll recall Lua Lua? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Fair play to him if he ends up North London. Fair's probably not the best term for it. If he wanted to go there he could just as easily have handed in a transfer request rather than opening a twitter account to spread s**** and lower the fee for the club that's tapping him up. Care to explain why, if he was so desperate to go as is claimed, there was any need for the Twitter bollocks (or a transfer request), when the club were trying to sell him anyway? I've asked this about 10 times in this thread and still not had a decent answer. If we were so eager to sell, why we letting him go for free? Barton has made it clear he would not be sold at any price. He wanted to see out his contract or go for nothing. I believe it was a matter of principal following the manner of Carroll's departure, whereby the pushed him into the corner of a transfer request (which I think he was a twat for submitting). The club therefore had a player who they would be forced to spend another £3m in wages on and who guaranteed a zero return. As with EVERY decision made at the club, this one was made to save money. Ashley's view is £3m is worth more than 30 odd appearances over the season from JB. I don't think anyone can argue that the club has sinister reasons behind wanting him out but Barton made it too easy. Infact i probably would have kicked the fucker out, but i wouldn't have messed around a hand full of players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Barton was a good player for us but in the grande scheme of things he's quite average and limited in the same way Nolan is/was despite him being the top goalscoring midfielder in the country last season. He's not average. Of course he is. He has no pace, lacks stamina and doesn't score many goals. He's a decent set piece taker and has good passing skills but in general he's a very limited player. He was performing well in a side that was at times perfect for him. What he lacks in pace he make up in determination, grit and hard work. He's the type of player (almost) every team would be glad to have in the line up. He showed in plenty matches how important he was for us just because of those qualities. On top of that he has a great right leg. Both when it came to passing and crossing. Doesn't make him a top player. A top player for us he was but he's just an average player in terms of all-round ability for me. I wouldn't even have him in my starting 11 at Newcastle if I'm being honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Barton was a good player for us but in the grande scheme of things he's quite average and limited in the same way Nolan is/was despite him being the top goalscoring midfielder in the country last season. He's not average. Of course he is. He has no pace, lacks stamina and doesn't score many goals. He's a decent set piece taker and has good passing skills but in general he's a very limited player. He was performing well in a side that was at times perfect for him. What he lacks in pace he make up in determination, grit and hard work. He's the type of player (almost) every team would be glad to have in the line up. He showed in plenty matches how important he was for us just because of those qualities. On top of that he has a great right leg. Both when it comes to passing and crossing. Fletcher, Lucas, Cahill, Terry, half the Stoke squad, they all have those kind of attributes yet cause no trouble. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Logic Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Nolan and Barton are as good as gone. Not that I particularly like being proved correct. It was always going to happen as far as I could see. Barton HAS been an idiot about this, and as others have suggested - he can't be so thick that he didn't realise it was coming. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Barton was a good player for us but in the grande scheme of things he's quite average and limited in the same way Nolan is/was despite him being the top goalscoring midfielder in the country last season. He's not average. Of course he is. He has no pace, lacks stamina and doesn't score many goals. He's a decent set piece taker and has good passing skills but in general he's a very limited player. He was performing well in a side that was at times perfect for him. What he lacks in pace he make up in determination, grit and hard work. He's the type of player (almost) every team would be glad to have in the line up. He showed in plenty matches how important he was for us just because of those qualities. On top of that he has a great right leg. Both when it came to passing and crossing. Doesn't make him a top player. A top player for us he was but he's just an average player in terms of all-round ability for me. I wouldn't even have him in my starting 11 at Newcastle if I'm being honest. He's not a "top player", but he's sure as hell not an average player. That's just pure biased bullshit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Any chance we'll recall Lua Lua? I hope not, it's totally unfair on the player to keep pissing him about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Arsenal been linked with him apparently Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 If it's true he wouldn't sign unless he got a 4 year deal then we did the right thing in withdrawing the 3 year contract IMO. Him and Nolan tried to use each other as leverage for big money and now are on a wrecking mission because their bluff was called. It's footballs equivalent of a scorched earth policy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Arsenal been linked with him apparently What? By Barton's agent? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Begbie Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 To say Barton is isnt a good footballer is just stupid. He was one of our best performers last season, and has been for some years one of our most talented footballers in the squad. People are moaning about players not saying what they want etc(see M.Owen), but when players do rant like joey does you want him to keep his mouth shut. I dont know what happend behind the closed doors, but it seems like something has really upset him, Enrique, Ranger, and Nolan(Keegan before). Why cant Mike Ashley just sell our club to some filty rich arabs... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Fair play to him if he ends up North London. Fair's probably not the best term for it. If he wanted to go there he could just as easily have handed in a transfer request rather than opening a twitter account to spread s**** and lower the fee for the club that's tapping him up. Care to explain why, if he was so desperate to go as is claimed, there was any need for the Twitter bollocks (or a transfer request), when the club were trying to sell him anyway? I've asked this about 10 times in this thread and still not had a decent answer. If we were so eager to sell, why we letting him go for free? Barton has made it clear he would not be sold at any price. He wanted to see out his contract or go for nothing. I believe it was a matter of principal following the manner of Carroll's departure, whereby the pushed him into the corner of a transfer request (which I think he was a t*** for submitting). The club therefore had a player who they would be forced to spend another £3m in wages on and who guaranteed a zero return. As with EVERY decision made at the club, this one was made to save money. Ashley's view is £3m is worth more than 30 odd appearances over the season from JB. I've heard the argument that 'if he wanted to go where's the transfer request' thing, yet by the same token if we were so desperate to get rid, why didn't we transfer list him? I'm sure some club would have spent £2-3m on him now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 If it's true he wouldn't sign unless he got a 4 year deal then we did the right thing in withdrawing the 3 year contract IMO. Him and Nolan tried to use each other as leverage for big money and now are on a wrecking mission because their bluff was called. It's footballs equivalent of a scorched earth policy. Don't know how people can ignore the players' part in this whole thing. If your club offers you a deal you aren't happy with, fair enough, look for another club who'll give you what you want. But why be a twat about it in the media? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Fair play to him if he ends up North London. Fair's probably not the best term for it. If he wanted to go there he could just as easily have handed in a transfer request rather than opening a twitter account to spread s**** and lower the fee for the club that's tapping him up. Care to explain why, if he was so desperate to go as is claimed, there was any need for the Twitter bollocks (or a transfer request), when the club were trying to sell him anyway? I've asked this about 10 times in this thread and still not had a decent answer. If we were so eager to sell, why we letting him go for free? Barton has made it clear he would not be sold at any price. He wanted to see out his contract or go for nothing. I believe it was a matter of principal following the manner of Carroll's departure, whereby the pushed him into the corner of a transfer request (which I think he was a t*** for submitting). The club therefore had a player who they would be forced to spend another £3m in wages on and who guaranteed a zero return. As with EVERY decision made at the club, this one was made to save money. Ashley's view is £3m is worth more than 30 odd appearances over the season from JB. I've heard the argument that 'if he wanted to go where's the transfer request' thing, yet by the same token if we were so desperate to get rid, why didn't we transfer list him? I'm sure some club would have spent £2-3m on him now. Do clubs really need to see somebody on a "transfer list" (has a transfer list ever existed? What form does it take?) to know they're available from NUFC? They're all available, all the time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 If it's true he wouldn't sign unless he got a 4 year deal then we did the right thing in withdrawing the 3 year contract IMO. Him and Nolan tried to use each other as leverage for big money and now are on a wrecking mission because their bluff was called. It's footballs equivalent of a scorched earth policy. Don't know how people can ignore the players' part in this whole thing. If your club offers you a deal you aren't happy with, fair enough, look for another club who'll give you what you want. But why be a twat about it in the media? Perhaps because the club have fucked him about. Perhaps because they lied. Perhaps because they're complete cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Arsenal been linked with him apparently What? By Barton's agent? Aren't you hilarious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 I really can't see Wenger in for Barton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Wherever he goes, he'll get a great reception from NUFC fans next season. 100% guaranteed. Whoever gets him, will get him at the best he's been for 4 years. Someone's getting a bargain here.................if they can afford the agents fees! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Optimistic: I'm not sure a club would spend 2-3 mill on Barton after his twitter antics..He comes with a lot of baggage. Now we save money on wages, which could be used on financing the wages of Barton's replacement..Besides, we need a different kind of rm if we want the best out of BA..Barton drifts too much inside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted August 1, 2011 Share Posted August 1, 2011 Barton was excellent for the majority of last season and to say otherwise is just based upon a simple and silly dislike of him as a person. Yes he was very underwhelming up until the start of 10/11 but he was a top performing player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now