Jump to content

Realistic Transfer Targets January 2010


Howaythelads

Recommended Posts

The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? W

 

Same as we have done with Pancrate?

 

Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is shite you know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? W

 

Because he's good. Get him on a pay as you play contract to minimise the risk

But mate, he's injured.

 

But he won't always be injured. Wait until he's fit and then snap him up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Heneage

The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother? W

 

Same as we have done with Pancrate?

 

Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is s**** you know.

I didn't say he was shite, but he's well known for having a bad injury record.

 

He's currently out with a ruptured achilies tendon which he had to have surgery on. I bet he would require some sort of signing on fee, as he won't just move up here without some form of financial gurantee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother?

 

Same as we have done with Pancrate?

 

Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is s**** you know.

I didn't say he was shite, but he's well known for having a bad injury record.

 

He's currently out with a ruptured achilies tendon which he had to have surgery on. I bet he would require some sort of signing on fee, as he won't just move up here without some form of financial gurantee.

 

Shirley, if we were going to sign him, we would offer a very low wage P/W and then offer bonuses on a pay as you play basis. Then again, deals like that, are too complex for us..................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Heneage

The guy hardly played for Fulham and has hardly played for Derby because of injuries, if his contract expries next year and he's injured for most of it. Why should we bother?

 

Same as we have done with Pancrate?

 

Just because he has been released by his club, doesnt automatically mean he is s**** you know.

I didn't say he was s****, but he's well known for having a bad injury record.

 

He's currently out with a ruptured achilies tendon which he had to have surgery on. I bet he would require some sort of signing on fee, as he won't just move up here without some form of financial gurantee.

 

Shirley, if we were going to sign him, we would offer a very low wage P/W and then offer bonuses on a pay as you play basis. Then again, deals like that, are too complex for us..................

Ergo my point, you are going to offer a wage to someone who has failed to prove fitness for close to 3 seasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye?  ???

You'd still want him? ???

 

Could we sign a better RB for less than that? ???

 

He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye?  ???

You'd still want him? ???

 

Could we sign a better RB for less than that? ???

 

He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa.

 

they may not have paid us all the milner money so could in theory cost us nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye?  ???

You'd still want him? ???

 

Could we sign a better RB for less than that? ???

 

He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa.

 

they may not have paid us all the milner money so could in theory cost us nothing.

 

Did you used to dabble in the subprime markets?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if Villa would take £500k for Beye?  ???

You'd still want him? ???

 

Could we sign a better RB for less than that? ???

 

He's obviously not getting his game and we're looking quite good for promotion, so why not? We haven't got a RB on our books and adding Simpson and Beye for a million would be good business if we can swing it with Man U and Villa.

 

they may not have paid us all the milner money so could in theory cost us nothing.

 

Did you used to dabble in the subprime markets?

 

nope living mortgage free thanks I guess i didnt explain myself well I meant there wouldnt be any outlay free Ashleys pocket if there is still a balance to pay of Milner

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...