Kaizero Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. It was inches away from crossing the line man It may not have been an easy chance to get on the end of, but was by far the biggest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 If Carroll would actually score hed be a very very good centre foward. Thats becoming a bigger if as time passes now unfortunately. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***s sake it was one of those nights,to read some of the people on here you would think we have just f***ing slipped into the bottom 3 and had Cunningham and Goddard up front. God, thats harking back a bit. And I'd like to remind you Goddard was an absolute collossus for us. Fuck off,the ball boys were sick of picking the ball outta leazes park. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
QBG Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Lovenkrands played well, Carroll did nothing in the air, and barely anything with the ball on the deck as usual. Ranger is a far better player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. It was inches away from crossing the line man It may not have been an easy chance to get on the end of, but was by far the biggest. 'The best chance' is the easiest to score. That certainly wasn't Ranger's effort. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 0-0, good game, and what chances we got were wasted (and as usual some prefered to fool themselves on certain players) Lets face it though Derby deserved their point. What is wrong with your brain Nothing whatsoever wrong with mine, but your faith in Nile Ranger shows just what yours is like. Incapable of commenting in defence of young Nile ? No bloody wonder. Barn doors and three paces spring to mind, don't they ? What springs to mind is moron tbh He did fine with the chance, it was a great save. The problem though regardless is that near the entire side missed chances throughout the entire game & you've chosen to comment on an 18 year olds 1 touch of the ball in the last 5 minutes. Then you try to form an argument about bias towards a player. It couldnt be more laughable. You can lead a horse to water, but despite the bleeding obvious he won't drink Just remind me again - ONE goal in HOW many ? Bias against ONE player ? You THAT stupid man ? I criticise the lad for NOT producing. He isn't no matter how much you want to con yourself. I'd have thought if he was going to be a striker with a good future we'd have seen something by now. Thats bias ? Don't be so bloody stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Nowt else he could do with it tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. Three? I'm sure it was 6-8. Still a piss easy chance that he should be finishing, he headed it straight at him. I thought he was poor tonight if I'm honest, offered little and looked nervous on the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. It was inches away from crossing the line man It may not have been an easy chance to get on the end of, but was by far the biggest. Thought Ryan Taylor's one on one in the first half was a bigger chance than both of them tbh, considering how much time he had. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. It was inches away from crossing the line man It may not have been an easy chance to get on the end of, but was by far the biggest. 'The best chance' is the easiest to score. That certainly wasn't Ranger's effort. I'll play the "English is my second language card" there, I was certain you were on about the biggest chance of the match Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. It was inches away from crossing the line man It may not have been an easy chance to get on the end of, but was by far the biggest. Thought Ryan Taylor's one on one in the first half was a bigger chance than both of them tbh, considering how much time he had. I'd forgotten all about that one, I agree, mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 f***ing s***. cant be arsed doing ratings. apalling that guthrie didn't play, carroll can f*** off as well he's s****. drowd were shocking as well fwiw. Did Carroll glass you or something? Him and Lovenkrands were working well together, if we'd stuck with them we probably would have scored. Carroll did absolutely nowt in the first half bar win a few headers. He created the best chance of the match. That would be Ranger's chance. Get out. Taylor had a free header three yards out, centre of goal. It was inches away from crossing the line man It may not have been an easy chance to get on the end of, but was by far the biggest. Thought Ryan Taylor's one on one in the first half was a bigger chance than both of them tbh, considering how much time he had. Fair enough, but then he had to consider and beat the approaching goalkeeper. Taylor was so close all he had to do was not head it in a straight line at a good height. If he'd headed it down he wouldn't have even had to head it in a particular direction. Both were terrible misses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 0-0, good game, and what chances we got were wasted (and as usual some prefered to fool themselves on certain players) Lets face it though Derby deserved their point. What is wrong with your brain Nothing whatsoever wrong with mine, but your faith in Nile Ranger shows just what yours is like. Incapable of commenting in defence of young Nile ? No bloody wonder. Barn doors and three paces spring to mind, don't they ? What springs to mind is moron tbh He did fine with the chance, it was a great save. The problem though regardless is that near the entire side missed chances throughout the entire game & you've chosen to comment on an 18 year olds 1 touch of the ball in the last 5 minutes. Then you try to form an argument about bias towards a player. It couldnt be more laughable. You can lead a horse to water, but despite the bleeding obvious he won't drink Just remind me again - ONE goal in HOW many ? Bias against ONE player ? You THAT stupid man ? I criticise the lad for NOT producing. He isn't no matter how much you want to con yourself. I'd have thought if he was going to be a striker with a good future we'd have seen something by now. Thats bias ? Don't be so bloody stupid. He's been a sub in most of those apps, it's about goals to minutes. Not goals to apps, and comparing that he's not done too bad. Plus, he offers a lot more than scoring as he's been one of the few forwards playing for us this season which has been able to create things for others and actually participate in more than waiting for the ball to finish it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 It was like the Bristol City match. Only Derby were 100 times better. Bristol were hugely lucky. Derby deserved their point. Lets face it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 It was like the Bristol City match. Only Derby were 100 times better. Bristol were hugely lucky. Derby deserved their point. Lets face it. They didn't deserve their points. They were one of the most dire oppositions we've played this seasons, and we should have absolutely hammered them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 On way home, will give my full opinion later when I'm home and can feel my fingers again. Ranger couldn't have done much more (at the other end we thought he'd scored), Derby were a bunch of cheating pricks and the referee half of the time didn't even call them over for a word about it, we missed a shed load of chances in the first half and Enrique's distribution was woeful by his standards. Once again we slip up against 'the Rams' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wally_McFool Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Absolute shite... but we should still have scored at least 5. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 0-0, good game, and what chances we got were wasted (and as usual some prefered to fool themselves on certain players) Lets face it though Derby deserved their point. What is wrong with your brain Nothing whatsoever wrong with mine, but your faith in Nile Ranger shows just what yours is like. Incapable of commenting in defence of young Nile ? No bloody wonder. Barn doors and three paces spring to mind, don't they ? What springs to mind is moron tbh He did fine with the chance, it was a great save. The problem though regardless is that near the entire side missed chances throughout the entire game & you've chosen to comment on an 18 year olds 1 touch of the ball in the last 5 minutes. Then you try to form an argument about bias towards a player. It couldnt be more laughable. You can lead a horse to water, but despite the bleeding obvious he won't drink Just remind me again - ONE goal in HOW many ? Bias against ONE player ? You THAT stupid man ? I criticise the lad for NOT producing. He isn't no matter how much you want to con yourself. I'd have thought if he was going to be a striker with a good future we'd have seen something by now. Thats bias ? Don't be so bloody stupid. i've seen something. good movement, pace, tidy on the floor, not great in the air but not bad and has scored headers in the reserves. all that along with his reserves scoring record points to a decent prospect. depends how you look at it. oh and this doesnt count as a bite, its far too reasoned. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 It was like the Bristol City match. Only Derby were 100 times better. Bristol were hugely lucky. Derby deserved their point. Lets face it. Uh...uh....mmmm ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 He's been a sub in most of those apps, it's about goals to minutes. Not goals to apps, and comparing that he's not done too bad. Plus, he offers a lot more than scoring as he's been one of the few forwards playing for us this season which has been able to create things for others and actually participate in more than waiting for the ball to finish it. He's played in an awful lot of games this season. The lads OK, but NOT what some would have you believe. He'll have to start scoring. End of story. I just match up the reaction to Nile and Shola from many on here, and shake my head in disgust. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 It was like the Bristol City match. Only Derby were 100 times better. Bristol were hugely lucky. Derby deserved their point. Lets face it. Uh...uh....mmmm ok. Fine. So you disagree. Why ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sh74 Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 Who was in our midfield in the premiership last season pre Kevin Nolan? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 It was like the Bristol City match. Only Derby were 100 times better. Bristol were hugely lucky. Derby deserved their point. Lets face it. Fine. So you disagree. Why ? Uh...uh....mmmm ok. They were shit,we didnt take our chances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 You can lead a horse to water, but despite the bleeding obvious he won't drink Just remind me again - ONE goal in HOW many ? Bias against ONE player ? You THAT stupid man ? I criticise the lad for NOT producing. He isn't no matter how much you want to con yourself. I'd have thought if he was going to be a striker with a good future we'd have seen something by now. Thats bias ? Don't be so bloody stupid. You've just watched a game where we've had about 4 or 5 clear chances to score. You've then chosen to pick up on the one an 18 year old has hit against the underside of the bar and had bounce on the line in the last few mins of the game, having been on for 10 minutes. He is regularly getting on the pitch now, for the last quarter hour of matches at best & you're having a go that he doesnt produce. Having just seen a game, with about 50 more talking points than Nile Rangers effort being anywhere close to bad. What more do i need to explain to you? You're looking for reasons to have a go at the lad & its a rather pointless effort. Mainly because its coming from your brain. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 this forum honestly if the keeper didn't pull off an incredible save, Phil K and others wouldn't be complaining about Nile... for this week anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now