Guest neesy111 Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 QPR are making a statement of intent that they are desperate for promotion, they've signed Chimbonda as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Not surprised at all if he has finally gone. Not to sound like a typical ITK bullshitter but I do know some one who spoke to him not that long ago and he said he didn't think he would stay in Newcastle that long as he was missing London. Bit of a shit reason to go back, considering how short a footballers career is. Sums him up as a footballer really. No desire or ambition, just a waste of ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest axel Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I'm not a big fan of Routledge and i wouldn't mind loaning him out, but when our midfield has so many injuries this isn't a good decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Wayne heads Rout on loan - ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Wayne heads Rout on loan - ffs Such shit man, should of been 'Newcastle send player Rout on on loan.' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I think he's shit, his level is championship, he was a fine signing to get us over the line, but his shitness in this division was somewhat written on the wall. I still think getting rid of him now is idiotic mind you. Our strength in depth is abysmal all over the shop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 I think regardless, Routledge was a very good signing and important in securing promotion with relative ease in the end. Concerned if we don't replace him, but otherwise wish him luck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Was a good player for us last season, has had his good games (And his bad) this year. Replace him and I'm happy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 "Queens Park Wayne-gers" would have been better Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 If we replace him with better then fine, it will be a great move by all parties. If we don't then it is a stupid move which may, and probably will come back to haunt us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? Because at this current time, we have nobody else who can play there other than Barton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? Because at this current time, we have nobody else who can play there other than Barton. Gosling & Jonas. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? During tomorrow's game if we lose a midfielder to injury, we have literally nobody to turn to. Reason enough to not let him go on loan and without a replacement in place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? Because at this current time, we have nobody else who can play there other than Barton. Gosling & Jonas. Can hardly rely on Gosling at this moment, and if Jonas covers right who will play left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Loaning him out at this stage is stupid as he can do a job for us when needed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? During tomorrow's game if we lose a midfielder to injury, we have literally nobody to turn to. Reason enough to not let him go on loan and without a replacement in place. It's a no brainer really, even though this seems to have somehow escaped the no brainers in charge of the club.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luc Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Loaning him out at this stage is stupid as he can do a job for us when needed. Although he looks like a fucking alien, I agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? Because at this current time, we have nobody else who can play there other than Barton. Gosling & Jonas. Can hardly rely on Gosling at this moment, and if Jonas covers right who will play left. Besides, isn't Gosling a central midfielder by trade? Barton has worked out fine there, but I do remember the likes of Bowyer in that position looking half the player they looked in the middle. It's a specialist position, in which we have absolutely no cover now.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? During tomorrow's game if we lose a midfielder to injury, we have literally nobody to turn to. Reason enough to not let him go on loan and without a replacement in place. We have Gosling & Ferguson. Plus Tiote will only have one more game to go. We can also play Ranger on the right like we did at Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted January 21, 2011 Share Posted January 21, 2011 Surprised about the animosity. We knew what we were getting when we got him and he did what we expected from him. Maybe not quite good enough at this level, but that's hardly his fault and I think we may regret it greatly if Barton is out for any amount of time. Also, he gave us pace, something few of our other players do which can be very useful from the bench in certain situation. Surprised and not happy with this development. We'd better replace him. Agree. I don't think people are slagging him off as such, but I'm seeing people say he's not Premier League class but would keep him...why? During tomorrow's game if we lose a midfielder to injury, we have literally nobody to turn to. Reason enough to not let him go on loan and without a replacement in place. We have Gosling & Ferguson. Plus Tiote will only have one more game to go. We can also play Ranger on the right like we did at Chelsea. Gosling's out tomorrow isn't he? Obviously after the Spurs game, he and/or Guthrie will be an option Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now