Guest elbee909 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Wage turnover ratio 82.2% If the figure is correct they r doomed That figure is not correct,the wages/turnover is 71.2% down from 76.8% in 2009. Sorry to spoil the fun. Wow, big news. Calls for a pitch invasion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Wage turnover ratio 82.2% If the figure is correct they r doomed That figure is not correct,the wages/turnover is 71.2% down from 76.8% in 2009. Sorry to spoil the fun. Where's this from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 That figure is not correct,the wages/turnover is 71.2% down from 76.8% in 2009. http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7830/8594display.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 I guess it's because turnover has gone up thanks to the brilliant attendances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Wage turnover ratio 82.2% If the figure is correct they r doomed That figure is not correct,the wages/turnover is 71.2% down from 76.8% in 2009. Sorry to spoil the fun. Where's this from? Numerous newspapers and websites. Still stupidly high like but not in comparision to some other teams ratios.Man City's was 98% in the last accounts and indeed Newcastle's was over 84% in the last accounts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 It'll be all those DVDs of their win at Chelsea. Queues going down the street, I heard..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Wage turnover ratio 82.2% If the figure is correct they r doomed That figure is not correct,the wages/turnover is 71.2% down from 76.8% in 2009. Sorry to spoil the fun. Where's this from? Numerous newspapers and websites. Still stupidly high like but not in comparision to some other teams ratios.Man City's was 98% in the last accounts and indeed Newcastle's was over 84% in the last accounts. Whatever makes you sleep easier at night. Your wage bill has certainly increased and attendances dropped...I know who I believe and it isn't a mackem trying to save face on a Newcastle forum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 It'll be all those DVDs of their win at Chelsea. Queues going down the street, I heard..... Any idea how the sales of the DVD of Newcastle's "draw" with Arsenal are progressing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 It'll be all those DVDs of their win at Chelsea. Queues going down the street, I heard..... Any idea how the sales of the DVD of Newcastle's "draw" with Arsenal are progressing? Not on sale yet. Are you lot still celebrating your epic 1-1 win over us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 It'll be all those DVDs of their win at Chelsea. Queues going down the street, I heard..... Any idea how the sales of the DVD of Newcastle's "draw" with Arsenal are progressing? Not selling as much as the 5-1 bumming of yoos! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Only the ones that are good, all the bad ones are rubbish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Yes it seems so,loss of nearly £28m and the highest paid director now only £325k compared to £900k the previous year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Yes it seems so,loss of nearly £28m and the highest paid director now only £325k compared to £900k the previous year. So how much did you lot turnover and how much were the wages then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Only the ones that are good, all the bad ones are rubbish. It's a pretty grim picture overall for them though. They've got some canny player but it's not sustainable at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Only the ones that are good, all the bad ones are rubbish. It's a pretty grim picture overall for them though. They've got some canny player but it's not sustainable at all. From before: Its starting to dawn on them...finally http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=570665 We are living consistently £27m beyond our means Full stadiums would reduce our annual loss to just £24m Yep the income would be nowt really, im starting to worry about this we cant go on making a loss like this imho unless short really is in it to win it. I cant see us breaking our transfer record anytime soon like. I think we all know where the problem lies and at this moment in time it isn't with the fans Its disappointing given all the attempts to cut the wage bill that we our wages ratio is still rising! As someone else has said, be careful slagging Bruce, Quinny and the club off. We are a fed-up owner away from slipping under the water. We have one fit striker that is ours, two of our back four are on loan, our other top striker is on loan and we have a few more on loan like elmo. We have a half built squad tbh that will need another round of investment to repeat what we might do this season. Even with a full stadium it will be a £24m loss, and Wearside expects us to believe the wage ratio isn't the 80%+ as reported? Where is all the money going? They pay over the odds to bring in average players or they'd not get any one in at all and are paying players way beyond their talents. It's something we've done and just about survived; it wont end well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Numerous newspapers and websites. Still stupidly high like but not in comparision to some other teams ratios.Man City's was 98% in the last accounts and indeed Newcastle's was over 84% in the last accounts. Wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Only the ones that are good, all the bad ones are rubbish. It's a pretty grim picture overall for them though. They've got some canny player but it's not sustainable at all. It's only a grim picture if Ellis Short decides to leave,as long as he is happy to continue bankrolling us its nothing to worry about. If Abramovich left Chelsea it would be grim for them. If the Man City owners left it would be grim for them. Loads of other teams could also fall into that category. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wearside Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Numerous newspapers and websites. Still stupidly high like but not in comparision to some other teams ratios.Man City's was 98% in the last accounts and indeed Newcastle's was over 84% in the last accounts. Wrong. Sorry my apologies it was 82.6% http://www.sundaysun.co.uk/news/north-east-news/2010/05/02/newcastle-united-accounts-reveal-111m-debt-79310-26358985/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Are the rest of the facts and figures correct in that summary btw? Only the ones that are good, all the bad ones are rubbish. It's a pretty grim picture overall for them though. They've got some canny player but it's not sustainable at all. It's only a grim picture if Ellis Short decides to leave,as long as he is happy to continue bankrolling us its nothing to worry about. If Abramovich left Chelsea it would be grim for them. If the Man City owners left it would be grim for them. Loads of other teams could also fall into that category. Portsmouth, for example, or Leeds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 The mirror gives the turnover/wages ratio of 82% and also gives the figures. http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Sunderland-accounts-show-26m-losses-as-Ellis-Short-continues-to-bankroll-the-club-article698869.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Just been over RTG and apparantly Sunderland are an exelent attacking team who play it nicely along the deck, and Newcastle are a bunch of hard to beat scrappers, which of course explains why we have scored 42 and conceded 38, and Sunderland have scored 33 and conceded 33. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesPaul Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Numerous newspapers and websites. Still stupidly high like but not in comparision to some other teams ratios.Man City's was 98% in the last accounts and indeed Newcastle's was over 84% in the last accounts. Wrong. Sorry my apologies it was 82.6% http://www.sundaysun.co.uk/news/north-east-news/2010/05/02/newcastle-united-accounts-reveal-111m-debt-79310-26358985/ Would that not include wages from players from the relegation season? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 Numerous newspapers and websites. Still stupidly high like but not in comparision to some other teams ratios.Man City's was 98% in the last accounts and indeed Newcastle's was over 84% in the last accounts. Wrong. Have you worked out what £53.5 million out of £65.3 million is as a percentage yet? Sorry my apologies it was 82.6% http://www.sundaysun.co.uk/news/north-east-news/2010/05/02/newcastle-united-accounts-reveal-111m-debt-79310-26358985/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted February 16, 2011 Share Posted February 16, 2011 It'll be all those DVDs of their win at Chelsea. Queues going down the street, I heard..... Any idea how the sales of the DVD of Newcastle's "draw" with Arsenal are progressing? Is it out yet? You would imagine a game called by many neutrals as the PL greatest comeback is due a DVD release. I remember when you started off on this board as a well balanced & some appreciated your comments but the guard had to drop eventually & the bitterness is flowing. You did well to keep it going for so long. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts