Zero Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Mourinho's tactics hugely relies on a quality defensive midfielder, and that's why he splashed out 30m to bring back Matic. He was a big miss last night as you can see how s*** Luiz and Ramires were in that position. I believe he would bring in another one in the summer instead of just going for Diego Costa. And for this reason I do think it is a "transition" period for Chelsea. Jose did make it worse by fucking off Mata though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Awful job by Mourinho this season. Fact. Bullshit. Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? I can't see how you could argue that point when they have done better in the Premier League and Champions League. Disappointing - Yes Personified dickhead? - Yes Awful? - No Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Awful job by Mourinho this season. Fact. 2 trophies out of a possible 14 available in the last 4 years. £272,440,000 spent in that time. (lifted 'fact' from elsewhere so it might not be true.) It's almost as if there are other really good clubs in the world, who also spend assloads of money. Give over, man. He's managed 2 of the 3 cash richest clubs in the world in that period. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Awful job by Mourinho this season. Fact. 2 trophies out of a possible 14 available in the last 4 years. £272,440,000 spent in that time. (lifted 'fact' from elsewhere so it might not be true.) It's almost as if there are other really good clubs in the world, who also spend assloads of money. Give over, man. He's managed 2 of the 3 cash richest clubs in the world in that period. You'd have a point if he were only qualifying for the Europa or something. He'll win the league again with Chelsea, eventually, while doing no worse than the semis in the CL. And probably win a domestic cup here or there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandamninator Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? Ronaldo was claiming that during Mourinhos first season with Madrid as well. Apparently finishing runner up in the La Liga, winning the Copa Del Rey and losing in the Champions League semi finals was a step backwards from finishing runner up in the La Liga, getting knocked out 4-1 by a 3rd division team in the Copa Del Rey and getting knocked out in the Round of 16 by Lyon in the Champions League. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? What would you prefer? They're not progressed one bit this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 I prefer Semi Finals in Champions League to be honest Especially they got the Europa League after shamefully crashed out in group stage of Champions League Nah I agree that Jose didn't have a good season and another one like this may call the end of his 2nd reign in Chelsea But to say it is poor is a bit harsh imo. Personnel-wise Chelsea isn't good enough and doesn't fit Jose's tactics well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? Ronaldo was claiming that during Mourinhos first season with Madrid as well. Apparently finishing runner up in the La Liga, winning the Copa Del Rey and losing in the Champions League semi finals was a step backwards from finishing runner up in the La Liga, getting knocked out 4-1 by a 3rd division team in the Copa Del Rey and getting knocked out in the Round of 16 by Lyon in the Champions League. Well, no, none of that's remotely true, but I'll play along. I think all I ever said after Mourinho's first, underwhelming, season at Real is that they were far more watchable, and accumulated more points in the league with Pellegrini and the swap was a daft decision. It was, by the way. Anyway, Real have the best of the best managing them now while Mourinho's finishing 3rd with Chelsea and bitching about referees hurting them by audaciously giving penalties to the opposition. Things are as they should be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandamninator Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? What would you prefer? They're not progressed one bit this season. So you're essentially marking Mourinho down for not finishing 3rd in his Champions League group? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? Ronaldo was claiming that during Mourinhos first season with Madrid as well. Apparently finishing runner up in the La Liga, winning the Copa Del Rey and losing in the Champions League semi finals was a step backwards from finishing runner up in the La Liga, getting knocked out 4-1 by a 3rd division team in the Copa Del Rey and getting knocked out in the Round of 16 by Lyon in the Champions League. Well, no, none of that's remotely true, but I'll play along. I think all I ever said after Mourinho's first, underwhelming, season at Real is that they were far more watchable, and accumulated more points in the league with Pellegrini and the swap was a daft decision. It was, by the way. Anyway, Real have the best of the best managing them now while Mourinho's finishing 3rd with Chelsea and bitching about referees hurting them by audaciously giving penalties to the opposition. Things are as they should be. I am suprised you don't like Mourinho Ronaldo. Seems like he is cut from the same pompous cloth you are. In fact, I can't envision anyone on the planet that matches Mourinho's bloated self-importance and warped sense of reality as well as yourself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pandamninator Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? Ronaldo was claiming that during Mourinhos first season with Madrid as well. Apparently finishing runner up in the La Liga, winning the Copa Del Rey and losing in the Champions League semi finals was a step backwards from finishing runner up in the La Liga, getting knocked out 4-1 by a 3rd division team in the Copa Del Rey and getting knocked out in the Round of 16 by Lyon in the Champions League. Well, no, none of that's remotely true, but I'll play along. I think all I ever said after Mourinho's first, underwhelming, season at Real is that they were far more watchable, and accumulated more points in the league with Pellegrini and the swap was a daft decision. It was, by the way. Anyway, Real have the best of the best managing them now while Mourinho's finishing 3rd with Chelsea and bitching about referees hurting them by audaciously giving penalties to the opposition. Things are as they should be. I am suprised you don't like Mourinho Ronaldo. Seems like he is cut from the same pompous cloth you are. In fact, I can't envision anyone on the planet that matches Mourinho's bloated self-importance and warped sense of reality as well as yourself. I think what angers Ronaldo is that Mourinho gets lauded for it while people just call him out on it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Arrogance I can stomach. Cheating and cowardice I can't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucaAltieri Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Surely for Mourinho to have done an "awful" job Chelsea would have had to move backwards from last season? They have, though. Last season they finished 3rd and won the Europa League with a manager none of their cuntish fans wanted. I don't think he's done an awful job, just a poor one, fwiw. Wait a minute. You think going to semi finals in Champions League is an achievement worse than winning the Europa League? Or it is a wind up? Ronaldo was claiming that during Mourinhos first season with Madrid as well. Apparently finishing runner up in the La Liga, winning the Copa Del Rey and losing in the Champions League semi finals was a step backwards from finishing runner up in the La Liga, getting knocked out 4-1 by a 3rd division team in the Copa Del Rey and getting knocked out in the Round of 16 by Lyon in the Champions League. Well, no, none of that's remotely true, but I'll play along. I think all I ever said after Mourinho's first, underwhelming, season at Real is that they were far more watchable, and accumulated more points in the league with Pellegrini and the swap was a daft decision. It was, by the way. Anyway, Real have the best of the best managing them now while Mourinho's finishing 3rd with Chelsea and bitching about referees hurting them by audaciously giving penalties to the opposition. Things are as they should be. I am suprised you don't like Mourinho Ronaldo. Seems like he is cut from the same pompous cloth you are. In fact, I can't envision anyone on the planet that matches Mourinho's bloated self-importance and warped sense of reality as well as yourself. I think what angers Ronaldo is that Mourinho gets lauded for it while people just call him out on it. Because Mourinho has other things he contributes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Lets put it this way. If Benitez got to the semis of CL and all likelihood a 3rd placed finish after spending ANOTHER 100m the pitch forks would be out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucaAltieri Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Lets put it this way. If Benitez got to the semis of CL and all likelihood a 3rd placed finish after spending ANOTHER 100m the pitch forks would be out. And the people wielding them would be idiots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 What did mourinho spend 100m on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 What did mourinho spend 100m on? http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/chelsea-fc/transfers/verein_631_2013_default_default_alle_a_default.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Wow, net 50m or so then. Still, I like Willian but 30m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Lets put it this way. If Benitez got to the semis of CL and all likelihood a 3rd placed finish after spending ANOTHER 100m the pitch forks would be out. And the people wielding them would be idiots. So would those saying he hasn't had a poor season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 I am suprised you don't like Mourinho Ronaldo. Seems like he is cut from the same pompous cloth you are. In fact, I can't envision anyone on the planet that matches Mourinho's bloated self-importance and warped sense of reality as well as yourself. I think what angers Ronaldo is that Mourinho gets lauded for it while people just call him out on it. Could be. Or perhaps I just don't like a man who happens to be reviled across Europe for being a petty, cowardly, classless cheat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucaAltieri Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Wow, net 50m or so then. Still, I like Willian but 30m If you spend 50m and don't bring home the league title at the first attempt then you're a disaster. Let's ignore Brendan Rodgers having a 50m net spend in his first season with Liverpool then finishing 7th place in the league, out of both cups in the 4th round, and out of the Europa League in the round of 32. Chelsea's 50m is different and should have brought them silverware. Anything less is total failure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Wow, net 50m or so then. Still, I like Willian but 30m If you spend 50m and don't bring home the league title at the first attempt then you're a disaster. Let's ignore Brendan Rodgers having a 50m net spend in his first season with Liverpool then finishing 7th place in the league, out of both cups in the 4th round, and out of the Europa League in the round of 32. Chelsea's 50m is different and should have brought them silverware. Anything less is total failure. Are you chelping at me? I didn't fucking say anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LucaAltieri Posted May 1, 2014 Share Posted May 1, 2014 Wow, net 50m or so then. Still, I like Willian but 30m If you spend 50m and don't bring home the league title at the first attempt then you're a disaster. Let's ignore Brendan Rodgers having a 50m net spend in his first season with Liverpool then finishing 7th place in the league, out of both cups in the 4th round, and out of the Europa League in the round of 32. Chelsea's 50m is different and should have brought them silverware. Anything less is total failure. Are you chelping at me? I didn't fucking say anything. http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m298/europawpw/Capture.jpg No... I mean, I could. If you want. I should probably ask my wife first. I mean, yeah. Sure? Not complaining about you, just the general sentiment some are expressing that Mourinho hasn't delivered value for money this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now