Guest neesy111 Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Whats today crack with LFC takeover? Asian Bidder has fucked off, so only NESV bid left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 So if the High Court has granted an injunction against the injunction that H&G got in Texas can H&G now get an injunction to stop the injunction that is stopping the injunction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Would be amusing to see the carnage if that fraud Dalglish ever went back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 They've had more wins in court than in the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 For all the relief that will be felt by Liverpool if this sale to other Yanks goes through, it would be fucking beautiful if it's the equivalent of jumping out of one frying pan and into another for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Jimmy Tarbuck Where's Cilla and Ken Dodd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 So if the High Court has granted an injunction against the injunction that H&G got in Texas can H&G now get an injunction to stop the injunction that is stopping the injunction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Human faeces. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VegasToon Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 So if the High Court has granted an injunction against the injunction that H&G got in Texas can H&G now get an injunction to stop the injunction that is stopping the injunction? Holy crap...I wonder who has the actual jurisdication here. How can an England court over turn an US court and vice versa? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gleebals Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Thinking about the death penalty makes me a bit physically sick... it's fucking barbaric. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 The application for a TRO (injunction) in a Texas City court is one last, desperate, throw of the dice for Gillett & Hicks reveals how bankrupt their legal position is...basic principles of international law are (1) that an injunction issued by a Texas Court has no effect on actions in this (the UK) country; and, (2) that the court first dealing with the case should be the only court dealing with the matter to the end. Therefore, the Texas court will have to relinquish control to the High Court in London...if Hicks and Gilett really wanted to stop this transaction they needed an injunction from the High Court in London and another against New England Sports Ventures in Boston where that company is located. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 So if the High Court has granted an injunction against the injunction that H&G got in Texas can H&G now get an injunction to stop the injunction that is stopping the injunction? Holy crap...I wonder who has the actual jurisdication here. How can an England court over turn an US court and vice versa? That's what I'm wondering. Don't get how it can all come to this... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VegasToon Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 The application for a TRO (injunction) in a Texas City court is one last, desperate, throw of the dice for Gillett & Hicks reveals how bankrupt their legal position is...basic principles of international law are (1) that an injunction issued by a Texas Court has no effect on actions in this (the UK) country; and, (2) that the court first dealing with the case should be the only court dealing with the matter to the end. Therefore, the Texas court will have to relinquish control to the High Court in London...if Hicks and Gilett really wanted to stop this transaction they needed an injunction from the High Court in London and another against New England Sports Ventures in Boston where that company is located. Well that explains it, but do you really think the people of Texas give a shit about international law? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 The application for a TRO (injunction) in a Texas City court is one last, desperate, throw of the dice for Gillett & Hicks reveals how bankrupt their legal position is...basic principles of international law are (1) that an injunction issued by a Texas Court has no effect on actions in this (the UK) country; and, (2) that the court first dealing with the case should be the only court dealing with the matter to the end. Therefore, the Texas court will have to relinquish control to the High Court in London...if Hicks and Gilett really wanted to stop this transaction they needed an injunction from the High Court in London and another against New England Sports Ventures in Boston where that company is located. But what about the fact that it's KOP Holdings (USA-based company) selling Liverpool to NESV (USA-based company)? Surely America have some sort of power in this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 That would be KOP Holdings, LLC, operator of oil wells in Kansas, not Kop Football (Holdings) Ltd, the actual UK-registered company that owns LFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Hicks and Gillette have another court hearing in Texas at 7pm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 The application for a TRO (injunction) in a Texas City court is one last, desperate, throw of the dice for Gillett & Hicks reveals how bankrupt their legal position is...basic principles of international law are (1) that an injunction issued by a Texas Court has no effect on actions in this (the UK) country; and, (2) that the court first dealing with the case should be the only court dealing with the matter to the end. Therefore, the Texas court will have to relinquish control to the High Court in London...if Hicks and Gilett really wanted to stop this transaction they needed an injunction from the High Court in London and another against New England Sports Ventures in Boston where that company is located. So why did the judge give them the injunction? Should he not have ruled it outside his jurisdiction? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 That would be KOP Holdings, LLC, operator of oil wells in Kansas, not Kop Football (Holdings) Ltd, the actual UK-registered company that owns LFC. I didn't just put 'KOP Holdings' into google you know Just got the impression from the stuff I've read that the holding company was based in America. Quite a few Liverpool fans saying it too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 That would be KOP Holdings, LLC, operator of oil wells in Kansas, not Kop Football (Holdings) Ltd, the actual UK-registered company that owns LFC. I didn't just put 'KOP Holdings' into google you know Just got the impression from the stuff I've read that the holding company was based in America. Quite a few Liverpool fans saying it too. theres a few kop holdings, one is in the uk anothers in the states i think and im fairly sure theres one in the cayman islands too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VegasToon Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Page 3 and Page 7 show the ownership and why they went to a Dallas, Texas court. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/img/10-10/1014hicks1.pdf The US based company is KOP Investment, which resides in Dallas, Texas. KOP Investment is the primary owner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Man you couldn't write this stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest washeymag Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Just been watching those people being rescued on the news. It's so nice to see a glimmer of hope in their eyes and a smile on their mucky faces. But I still hope Everton beat them on Sunday. I go and get my coat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 That would be KOP Holdings, LLC, operator of oil wells in Kansas, not Kop Football (Holdings) Ltd, the actual UK-registered company that owns LFC. I didn't just put 'KOP Holdings' into google you know Just got the impression from the stuff I've read that the holding company was based in America. Quite a few Liverpool fans saying it too. Sorry There are two companies, Kop Football Limited and Kop Football (Holdings) Ltd, registered in Liverpool. Exactly how they're owned I don't know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Page 3 and Page 7 show the ownership and why they went to a Dallas, Texas court. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/img/10-10/1014hicks1.pdf The US based company is KOP Investment, which resides in Dallas, Texas. KOP Investment is the primary owner. Well spotted. I read that yesterday, as well Why in cock do they have so many holdings, and why do they all need to be plaintiffs? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 14, 2010 Share Posted October 14, 2010 Just been watching those people being rescued on the news. It's so nice to see a glimmer of hope in their eyes and a smile on their mucky faces. But I still hope Everton beat them on Sunday. I go and get my coat Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now