Jump to content

PauL The Octopus goes for Spain as WC Winners


Rob W

Recommended Posts

There was a 50/50 chance like.

 

Yes, well for example;

 

50/50 in one game means a 50% chance of getting it right.

 

50/50 in the next game means 50% chance of getting it right.

 

Chance of getting both right is 50% of 50% = 25%.

 

Say he predicted 8 matches correctly (more than that in reality).

 

50%-25%-17.5%-8.75%-4.37%-............

 

You have to admit, it's pretty impressive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read that the chances of his predictions being right the whole way through are 0.116%. He's one game away from it, ridiculous :lol:

 

Don't know where you got that stat from. Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair coin flips, the probability of 12 or more successful predictions in 14 attempts is ~0.65%, as given by the binomial distribution. And the probability of 8 successful predictions out of 8 attempts is ~0.39%

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just read that the chances of his predictions being right the whole way through are 0.116%. He's one game away from it, ridiculous :lol:

 

Don't know where you got that stat from. Assuming Paul's predictions were no better than fair coin flips, the probability of 12 or more successful predictions in 14 attempts is ~0.65%, as given by the binomial distribution. And the probability of 8 successful predictions out of 8 attempts is ~0.39%

 

Gahaha, just noticed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to take into account that the group stage games could have finished in a tie, which doesn't make them coin flips (still don't know how he could have predicted one, though)

 

If you treat it as 'Paul being right' against 'Paul not being right', it's essentially a coin-flip, as there's no accounting for a draw in the method of Paul's picking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to take into account that the group stage games could have finished in a tie, which doesn't make them coin flips (still don't know how he could have predicted one, though)

 

If you treat it as 'Paul being right' against 'Paul not being right', it's essentially a coin-flip, as there's no accounting for a draw in the method of Paul's picking.

 

It's not, since there are two possible instances of Paul not being right (opposition wins, game ends in a draw) versus one of him being right (team picked wins).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to take into account that the group stage games could have finished in a tie, which doesn't make them coin flips (still don't know how he could have predicted one, though)

 

If you treat it as 'Paul being right' against 'Paul not being right', it's essentially a coin-flip, as there's no accounting for a draw in the method of Paul's picking.

 

It's not, since there are two possible instances of Paul not being right (opposition wins, game ends in a draw) versus one of him being right (team picked wins).

 

The point is that the model through which Paul picks, has two outcomes (regardless of the games three possible outcomes), so it is as fair as a coin toss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a 50/50 chance like.

 

Yes, well for example;

 

50/50 in one game means a 50% chance of getting it right.

 

50/50 in the next game means 50% chance of getting it right.

 

Chance of getting both right is 50% of 50% = 25%.

 

Say he predicted 8 matches correctly (more than that in reality).

 

50%-25%-17.5%-8.75%-4.37%-............

 

You have to admit, it's pretty impressive.

 

It's lucky/rare, that's entirely different.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...