Jump to content

The other games today - 2010/11


clintdempsey

Recommended Posts

Guest ObiChrisKenobi

Ah, Mike Jones.  :lol: First time I've noticed him, but some mates at Uni were saying he's the worst ref they've seen along side Clattenburger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest toonlass

Rangers 1-0 up against Kilmarnock. Dirty, spitting, wife-beating Diouf scored.

 

You forgot mackem.

 

Dirty, spitting, wife-beating, Mackem-touching bastard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ObiChrisKenobi

Rangers 1-0 up against Kilmarnock. Dirty, spitting, wife-beating Diouf scored.

 

You forgot mackem.

 

Dirty, spitting, wife-beating, Mackem-touching bastard.

 

You forgot Big Sam Loving...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ObiChrisKenobi

The more I see Stoke, the more they come across as a very clever, but, dirty team with little sportsmanship.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BOMBARDMENT

 

this amused me

 

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_akJj0VF7J8k/RqXGSIUUqTI/AAAAAAAAAFY/9vfZC7NZtbo/s400/Coach_krupt_the_simpsons.jpg

 

Aye. It's always what I think of when Stoke build up a bit of pressure against someone for some reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lot have some biased viewpoints towards Stoke.  Understandable, but try to make your own mind up on the 90 minutes we just watched.

 

Why is it biased? I think they play shit, dirty football, hence would rather someone else won.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lot have some biased viewpoints towards Stoke.  Understandable, but try to make your own mind up on the 90 minutes we just watched.

 

Why is it biased? I think they play s***, dirty football, hence would rather someone else won.

 

You 'think', but they weren't dirty nor was the football 'shit'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lot have some biased viewpoints towards Stoke.  Understandable, but try to make your own mind up on the 90 minutes we just watched.

 

Why is it biased? I think they play s***, dirty football, hence would rather someone else won.

 

You 'think', but they weren't dirty nor was the football 'shit'.

 

To use your words, I guess we have different views on what constitutes good/shit football.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

You lot have some biased viewpoints towards Stoke.  Understandable, but try to make your own mind up on the 90 minutes we just watched.

 

Why is it biased? I think they play s***, dirty football, hence would rather someone else won.

 

You 'think', but they weren't dirty nor was the football 'shit'.

 

If you think that wasn't shit football, then god knows how fucking low your yardstick for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...