Skirge Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Another greedy Scouse cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 If he wanted five years I'm behind the club on this one, although I'm not entirely convinced his situation as is terminal as Barton's is because he's got that extra year to run on his deal. If he does piss off we'll struggle to find a player who can match his goals and leadership ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Another greedy Scouse cunt Fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Nolan's legs will be well and truly shot by the time he's 33 like, fucking 5 years man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 5 years Let the backtracking commence! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 The best thing about Nolan signing a new contract has alway been that it will probably be a morale boost to the rest of the camp, it's not like we have to tie him down to retain some sell on value. Now I like Nolan, but he'll be 30 coming into the 2012/2013 season (last season on his contract), and with Nolan suffering some sort of Old Snake rapid ageing process, this would put him at about 38 in normal footballers years, 4 seasons is an extremely generous offer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 The best thing about Nolan signing a new contract has alway been that it will probably be a morale boost to the rest of the camp, it's not like we have to tie him down to retain some sell on value. Do you really think the Enrique's, Coloccini's, Ben Arfa's, Krul's & Tiote's are on their holidays thinking, "They'd better give Nolan that brand new contract"? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Where has this five year thing come from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Where has this five year thing come from? Luke Edwards I think Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Where has this five year thing come from? The Sky Sports article. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Club made right decision, he wanted FIVE years. 5 years on X amount of money!?!?! If its true like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Where has this five year thing come from? Sky Sports article........... it says he wants an improved 5 year deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Well that is ridiculous if true. Doesn't seem to match with his comments a while back about knowing he's going to be phased out of the team though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Where has this five year thing come from? Sky Sports article........... it says he wants an improved 5 year deal. That's where it breaks for me. With that he wants more money and another year on his contract. Fucking hell, Nolan will help us stabilize as a Premier League team in the two coming years but I hope that after that we'll be looking at breaking into top 7 and Nolan will never be good enough for such a push. Should take his 3 year extension and shove it up his arse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 The best thing about Nolan signing a new contract has alway been that it will probably be a morale boost to the rest of the camp, it's not like we have to tie him down to retain some sell on value. Do you really think the Enrique's, Coloccini's, Ben Arfa's, Krul's & Tiote's are on their holidays thinking, "They'd better give Nolan that brand new contract"? I doubt it'll be some sort of magical spell cast on everyone as soon as he puts pen to paper, but I certainly think a happy and commited Nolan would be better for the team spirit, he's clearly a big charecter in the dressing room. I think he will grit his teeth and get on as usual anyway, regardless if his demands are answered or not, like, I was just making the point that tying Nolan down for a further 2 years isn;t realy neccesary (imo). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tisd09 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 As long as it doesn't effect his commitment to us then I see no problem with him not extending his contract. The problem may come if he sulks that he's not getting what he wants. If what is being said is true I'm glad the club are not committing. An extra 2 years on top of what he's got is more than adequate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest schmuck Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Well that is ridiculous if true. Doesn't seem to match with his comments a while back about knowing he's going to be phased out of the team though. Very true. 'A source' at it again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 If he's the type of pro I believe he is, he should be relishing the opportunity to try and match last season to show he's worth it so when it comes to this time next summer, we'll be looking at extending. By 3 years though? Again, not so sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 He isn't worth an extension at all tbh. I would have let him finish his contract, and then we should be in a position where we don't need him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Well that is ridiculous if true. Doesn't seem to match with his comments a while back about knowing he's going to be phased out of the team though. Very true. 'A source' at it again? It's funny how Nolan & Barton have both made all the right noises to the fans, in the press, on Twitter, etc. that they love the club, want to stay, etc. yet have never denied the "club source's" info that we've knocked them back due to the length of contract they're after. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Wouldn't surprise me if Barton and Nolan are merely trying to exploit their affinity with the fans and the area and didn't count on the club doing exactly the same back at them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 He isn't worth an extension at all tbh. I would have let him finish his contract, and then we should be in a position where we don't need him. This is how I see it, idealy Nolan will not be an automatic first teamer iin 2 years time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 Wouldn't surprise me if Barton and Nolan are merely trying to exploit their affinity with the fans and the area and didn't count on the club doing exactly the same back at them. Barton has been doing that exactly with his twitter stuff imo. Which is why I don't buy any of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 How come "most" people on here think that Nolan is shit until the opportunity comes along to criticise the current owner/chairman? I hope to god that Nolan isn't still in our first team in 2013!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted June 7, 2011 Share Posted June 7, 2011 I cant remember what news item i read about Nolan's contract but it said, He knew he wouldn't get a 5yr contract and was hoping for a 4yr, which he was offered but it was made up of incentives apparently, he must think he has earnt the right to a new contract without certain goals and attainments specified in it, he's wrong, no footballer should be entitled to anything without showing effort and progression. Every contract at any football club should be one of attainment, if your Swansea, Norwich or Q.P.R it should be about staying up, Teams like Fulham, Stoke etc it should be about getting mid table/top ten, Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal's it should be about winning trophies etc, the goals should change as a club progresses, as such so should the rewards. You do well you get paid more, you do badly you get a basic wage, shame this isn't standard practice as it would root out lazy footballers, teams that want to get better wont if 2 or 3 players aren't pulling their weight, knock on effect is the players trying hard wont get the extra money or whatever incentive offered if there held back by lazy or non producing players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now