Fenham Mag Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 I Think he'll try to get Hazard in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 I personally see Oxlade-Chamberlain as a replacement for Rosicky as fourth choice on the wings and let him develop quietly a bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 I personally see Oxlade-Chamberlain as a replacement for Rosicky as fourth choice on the wings and let him develop quietly a bit. Like with Sunderland and Wickham though, you need players for here and now, or it's bye bye top 4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Personally what I'm hearing from people who watch French football Gervinho is a much better player than Nasri so if we get what we payed for Gervinho for Nasri that's an upgrade, some people are forgetting that Nasri had a good 6 months, that's all. We obviously need another winger, another striker once we manage to offload Bendtner and another CM once we can fuck Denilson off to somewhere. If Cesc goes we need to sign a big player who can play behind RvP that's the main worry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Gervinho is nowhere near as good as Nasri was in the French League and neither is he better now. Whatever your hearing is bullshit. Gervinho however, is a good player but you cannot forget the adaptation to the league and the ACN will hit you harder than you think. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Nasri, Denilson and Cesc leaving would be terrible except if you actually get around £10million for Denilson which would make up the small amount you're getting for Nasri. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Denilson going is irrelevant, he's crap. Diaby/Ramsey/Frimpong are all better options than he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Nasri, Denilson and Cesc leaving would be terrible except if you actually get around £10million for Denilson which would make up the small amount you're getting for Nasri. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 defending Denilson. They'd be good to get any payment for that useless sack of shit. He's the Brazilian Nicky Butt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Personally what I'm hearing from people who watch French football Gervinho is a much better player than Nasri so if we get what we payed for Gervinho for Nasri that's an upgrade, some people are forgetting that Nasri had a good 6 months, that's all. We obviously need another winger, another striker once we manage to offload Bendtner and another CM once we can fuck Denilson off to somewhere. If Cesc goes we need to sign a big player who can play behind RvP that's the main worry. Nasri is far more versatile though. I must admit I don't watch a great deal of French football, but Nasri is an outstanding player and to think Gervinho, a striker-cum-winger, is an upgrade on a guy who played an absolutely essential role in keeping you in the top 4 during the first half of last season is a little optimistic to say the least. As mentioned, Nasri also isn't going to be off to the ACN. You'll be far better placed to deal with Fabregas leaving if Nasri stays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Denilson's shite, except when he twatted one in from 30 yards against us on the opening day 2 years ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 You guys got it all wrong, he's fucking abysmal and I know that. What I meant was that Nasri is easily worth £30million in todays market so Nasri and Denilson together must go for £30million. Meaning Denilson is worth shit all and can go for free. Thank you very much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spudil Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Gash, will the signing of Gervinho spell the end for Walcott? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bodson Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Personally what I'm hearing from people who watch French football Gervinho is a much better player than Nasri so if we get what we payed for Gervinho for Nasri that's an upgrade, some people are forgetting that Nasri had a good 6 months, that's all. We obviously need another winger, another striker once we manage to offload Bendtner and another CM once we can f*** Denilson off to somewhere. If Cesc goes we need to sign a big player who can play behind RvP that's the main worry. Nasri is far more versatile though. I must admit I don't watch a great deal of French football, but Nasri is an outstanding player and to think Gervinho, a striker-cum-winger, is an upgrade on a guy who played an absolutely essential role in keeping you in the top 4 during the first half of last season is a little optimistic to say the least. As mentioned, Nasri also isn't going to be off to the ACN. You'll be far better placed to deal with Fabregas leaving if Nasri stays. Nasri is proven in the premiership and he has just found his ways here. He was absolutely brilliant last season. To claim Gervinho is an upgrade is just mad... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 PSG "Big Bid" £13.5 million for Taarabt. Mad that. SSN. We get 40% of any fee so hope this goes through. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Personally what I'm hearing from people who watch French football Gervinho is a much better player than Nasri so if we get what we payed for Gervinho for Nasri that's an upgrade, some people are forgetting that Nasri had a good 6 months, that's all. We obviously need another winger, another striker once we manage to offload Bendtner and another CM once we can f*** Denilson off to somewhere. If Cesc goes we need to sign a big player who can play behind RvP that's the main worry. Gervinho better than Nasri? i'm afraid you're very wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 PSG "Big Bid" £13.5 million for Taarabt. Mad that. SSN. We get 40% of any fee so hope this goes through. If so that's probably why it's so high. You sure you get 40%? Seems quite a lot for a sell-on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 also, lol @ 'much better player'. You're fucking nuts, gash Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 PSG "Big Bid" £13.5 million for Taarabt. Mad that. SSN. We get 40% of any fee so hope this goes through. If so that's probably why it's so high. You sure you get 40%? Seems quite a lot for a sell-on. Yep Taarabt said it himself around a week ago (think around the time he was linked to you lot). That's probably why we agreed to sell him for such a low fee. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 PSG "Big Bid" £13.5 million for Taarabt. Mad that. SSN. That is ridiculous.......... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 £27,5 million for Palacios and Taraabt, if that is true then the world has gone mad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Gash, will the signing of Gervinho spell the end for Walcott? No. Walcott was great last season. I personally think next year we will see RvP Gervinho - Fabregas(fingers crossed) - Walcott Which for me is stronger, Nasri is not all that amazing. He had a good 6 months playing in the Cesc position and then scored the odd goal to keep people interested. Gervinho seems a lot more direct than what Nasri is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Are you genuinly of the opinion that Gervinho is better than Nasri? i mean you're being serious? I specifically remember you bigging up Nasri to extreme levels before....now he's "not all that amazing" and he "scored the odd goal to keep people interested". Sounds like sour grapes tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 Nasri is so overrated. Has delivered on his potential for about 3 months in the whole time he has been at Arsenal. For the money talked about he is best off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted July 1, 2011 Share Posted July 1, 2011 as a wide forward Gervinho probably is better in the final third as he'll get you more end product, and arsenal do need more directness to their game. Nasri is better in the middle with his touch, movement and passing. If both Nasri and Fabregas leave though, it's going to be incredibly difficult to replace what they give the side. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts