Gottlob Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 In goal both Pope and Dubravka have provided room for doubt while someone who could play out from the back seems like an obvious evolution. On the other hand I think it's fanciful to reckon that a new right winger would replicate Murphy's numbers or prove transformative to our play. All of our wingers get good numbers in terms of goals and assists but are lacking in the buildup, and if we're going to solve some of our creativity or ball retention issues I think you could just as well look to the midfield where we sometimes lack guile and control, with Willock and Longstaff now unreliable as backups. Then again if we are talking about need rather than changes and improvements to our style of play, a backup striker is probably the biggest imperative because the fall off from Isak seems huge. Pope and Dubravka still look like Premier League players and we can rejig the squad elsewhere, but right now an injury to Isak would leave us without threat or a focal point. So I reckon at least four new signings, including a new goalkeeper and centre-back then at least a couple of players who can add cover and competition at centre midfield, right wing and striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myleftboot Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 52 minutes ago, geordiekris said: Take with a pinch of salt but I've been told Lee Kang-in from PSG is seriously considered as part of the short list for RW. Thats from someone connected at the club. I also heard Foo King Mings was the best Chinese takeaway in Walker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 18 minutes ago, alexf said: I have read alot of strange things on here over the years, but this is right up there. Agreed. He’s 27 😃, and started three league games in Brazil… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 1 hour ago, geordiekris said: Take with a pinch of salt but I've been told Lee Kang-in from PSG is seriously considered as part of the short list for RW. Thats from someone connected at the club. Tried to sign him before he went to PSG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GallowgatePigeon Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 18 minutes ago, magorific said: Agreed. He’s 27 😃, and started three league games in Brazil… A young man still learning his craft, playing in the greatest league in the world, getting better every week. Let's not write him off just yet....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 1 hour ago, geordiekris said: Take with a pinch of salt but I've been told Lee Kang-in from PSG is seriously considered as part of the short list for RW. Thats from someone connected at the club. Wonder what the state of Saudi/Qatar relations are like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamPS Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 2 hours ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: I wouldn't have GK that high up, although it's possible the Trafford deal is basically done. It would be great but I would keep Pope another year if it meant we could get those other targets done. Selling Pope for £5m and signing Trafford for £20m on a 5 year contract probably produces a minor PSR improvement next year assuming similiar wages. Of course there’d then be a cost it later years. A new contract for Pope would be the other option which is cheaper still in PSR terms. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 2 hours ago, geordiekris said: Take with a pinch of salt but I've been told Lee Kang-in from PSG is seriously considered as part of the short list for RW. Thats from someone connected at the club. He was really good at the start of the season. Seems PSG are willing to let him go. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnny36 Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 2 hours ago, geordiekris said: Take with a pinch of salt but I've been told Lee Kang-in from PSG is seriously considered as part of the short list for RW. Thats from someone connected at the club. His stats arent great, albeit hes not a regular starter for PSG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 His passing stats are outrageously good tbf: https://fbref.com/en/players/8455ad90/scout/365_m1/Lee-Kang-in-Scouting-Report Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 2 hours ago, alexf said: I have read alot of strange things on here over the years, but this is right up there. Couldn't agree more. At first I thought he was taking the piss. The worst left back I've seen in a long time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 1500 mins is about 16 games. 6/6 GA is a decent return for that. He'd be my second favourite option. Apparently available for less than £25m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 3 hours ago, geordiekris said: Take with a pinch of salt but I've been told Lee Kang-in from PSG is seriously considered as part of the short list for RW. Thats from someone connected at the club. He's absolutely class Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 23 minutes ago, Checko said: His passing stats are outrageously good tbf: https://fbref.com/en/players/8455ad90/scout/365_m1/Lee-Kang-in-Scouting-Report Another that has the versatility that would come in very handy too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 10 minutes ago, Thumbheed said: 1500 mins is about 16 games. 6/6 GA is a decent return for that. He'd be my second favourite option. Apparently available for less than £25m. Only on around £60,000 at PSG too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 (edited) I’d rather have Lee Kang-in than Mbeumo. Then also have a lot of money for other positions too. He’s also ridiculously tidy in possession which is an area that we need to improve in as well. Always been impressed when I’ve seen him. I’ve said it before that I don’t see Brentford selling him for 50m. By the sounds of it they want closer to 65m. Edited May 6 by Ikon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 11 minutes ago, Ikon said: I’d rather have Lee Kang-in than Mbeumo. Then also have a lot of money for other positions too. He’s also ridiculously tidy in possession which is an area that we need to improve in as well. Always been impressed when I’ve seen him. I’ve said it before that I don’t see Brentford selling him for 50m. By the sounds of it they want closer to 65m. Getting Lee Kang-In for around £20 million at age 24 would be outrageous really. PSG are very reasonable with the fees they ask for once someone is ready to leave due to a lack of opportunities, and mostly look to just get their money back. These kinds of deals are out there, and are the sort of deals the club has to be all over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weezertron Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 Wouldn't Lee Kang-In be on Targett level wages? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunk Moreland Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 Just now, Weezertron said: Wouldn't Lee Kang-In be on Targett level wages? Even Neymar in Saudi wasn't on that much Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GallowgatePigeon Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 (edited) 1 hour ago, Rod said: Couldn't agree more. At first I thought he was taking the piss. The worst left back I've seen in a long time. I honestly can't believe any of you thought I was being serious with my Jamal Lewis comment, by Christ he's an abomination of a LB, he's the first one we need to bin. Maybe stick with your gut instinct next time Edited May 6 by GallowgatePigeon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagMal Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 I'm in, good players, some of that sweet Korean fan money, good price what's not to like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebelrouser Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 27 minutes ago, KaKa said: Getting Lee Kang-In for around £20 million at age 24 would be outrageous really. Did he just tear and ACL? PSG might be reasonable, but they are not that reasonable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 10 minutes ago, rebelrouser said: Did he just tear and ACL? PSG might be reasonable, but they are not that reasonable. There is nothing wrong with his ACL. The reports are out there. That is what they are asking for, as he wants to leave. It is what they paid to get him in the first place. Go and read them for yourself. Instead of speculating on how reasonable they will not be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 What I like about Lee Kang-In is his final ball; he's more of that creative player that we've sorely lacked. Great on dead ball and great movement into half spaces. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted May 6 Share Posted May 6 If true I’d be more than happy with Kang in Lee as he’s different to the wide players we have, more a David Silva type from what little I’ve seen of him. We’ve got pace and drive in the wings with Murphy, Barnes and Gordon. Players who can get a cross in (Murphy mostly, Barnes sometimes, Gordon less so). Can take long range shots (Murphy and Barnes) or cut in and curl in a shot (Gordon and Barnes). They’re all decent at varying levels running on to through balls and finishing (Barnes being the best). What we don’t have is a winger who can cut in and put in a through pass to Isak, play 1-2s around the edge of the box to set someone up or get a shot off or dribble past players ( we have runners not real dribbler’s though Barnes shows flashes at times). Would add a different dimension especially against teams that sit deep. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now