TK-421 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 11 minutes ago, RS said: Was there any reason he started? I did raise an eyebrow when he was named. Perhaps because I don’t rate him. As stated, Burn suspended, but then arguably had Krafth not got injured, he would have started alongside Schar rather than kelly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 4 minutes ago, TK-421 said: As stated, Burn suspended, but then arguably had Krafth not got injured, he would have started alongside Schar rather than kelly. Na, Kelly was always starting in Burns place. We get wrecked aerially if we are playing with Schar and Krafh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWMag Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Very poor for the first goal and had a few nervy moments, but he handled Antonio very well and made a very good tackle second half to stop a possible goal. I’m all for calling out the negatives but let’s not ignore the good things he did too. this is not necessarily a defence of him, as I’d be putting Burn straight back in, but more a point that his performance wasn’t as calamitous as I’m reading online. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, NWMag said: Very poor for the first goal and had a few nervy moments, but he handled Antonio very well and made a very good tackle second half to stop a possible goal. I’m all for calling out the negatives but let’s not ignore the good things he did too. this is not necessarily a defence of him, as I’d be putting Burn straight back in, but more a point that his performance wasn’t as calamitous as I’m reading online. He was at fault for both goals, so no matter what he did right, pretty hard to overlook that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverThere Posted 47 minutes ago Share Posted 47 minutes ago Both goals he was absent. Reminds me of Bramble, which is good stuff completely undone by disastrous moments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted 41 minutes ago Share Posted 41 minutes ago He was having a right old tussle with Antonio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted 38 minutes ago Share Posted 38 minutes ago Antonio beat himself TBH, he was more interested in getting into fights than playing football. Absolute clogger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWMag Posted 13 minutes ago Share Posted 13 minutes ago Just watched the 2nd goal again, just as poor from Longstaff and Pope IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted 11 minutes ago Share Posted 11 minutes ago 12 hours ago, The College Dropout said: I agree with this. I wasn’t high on the signing. Nothing from the eye test or stats excited me and he’s been worse than I even expected. They play different positions but this guy is meant to be the Lascelles/Krafth replacement right? Couldn’t lace their boots on his performances so far. I'm not sure if he's even as good as Paully D at this point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted 9 minutes ago Share Posted 9 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Antonio beat himself TBH, he was more interested in getting into fights than playing football. Absolute clogger. He's just a PL Akinfenwa. He's there for the ball to be held up and let Bowen, Pacqueta and Kudus/Summerville buzz around him hoping to create something in the aftermath. If he weighs in with a few goals for himself, fine. But it's not essential. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted 9 minutes ago Share Posted 9 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, NWMag said: Just watched the 2nd goal again, just as poor from Longstaff and Pope IMO Not Bruno for losing the ball in the first place? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted 8 minutes ago Share Posted 8 minutes ago Just now, Rod said: Not Bruno for losing the ball in the first place? Just addressed that again in the Bruno thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWMag Posted 7 minutes ago Share Posted 7 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Rod said: Not Bruno for losing the ball in the first place? It wasn’t great but not a massive error, and there was plenty of opportunity to stop the goal after that point so didn’t mention him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now