Yoane Wissa

[gdm]

Just now, Displayname said:

PSR amortisation is also max 5 years isn't it?

Yes 

[Gawalls]

3 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

Mate at most Isak cost £65m and he's done 3 years of a 6 year deal, how the fuck have you come up with a £44m book price?

wages on top of that to consider as well

 

 

Edited July 24, 2025 by Gawalls

[TheBrownBottle]

1 minute ago, Colos Short and Curlies said:

 

1st July wasn't it?

Early June from memory - but my memory has been wrong before  

[Gawalls]

1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said:

How do we lose money on the Isak sale?

I don’t mean lose money I mean the first 44m + sell on fee is gone

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

2 minutes ago, Displayname said:

PSR amortisation is also max 5 years isn't it?

Not at the time of us signing Isak, but even if it was it would’ve meant we’d have amortised 60% of his fee instead of 50%

[Displayname]

Just now, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

Not at the time of us signing Isak, but even if it was it would’ve meant we’d have amortised 60% of his fee instead of 50%

Yeah I know. Was more a post to back your numbers up even more

[madras]

1 minute ago, Displayname said:

PSR amortisation is also max 5 years isn't it?

Not sure if that was brought in after we bought Isak so does it count to those on longer contracts from before that ruling was brought in ?

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

3 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

wages on top of that to consider as well

 

 

 

You don’t consider wages remaining on a contract you’re not going to paying, you’ve had a very basic maths and logic 'mare here

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

4 minutes ago, gdm said:

Yes 

Now, but we bought Isak before the PL changed it to be five years after Chelsea took the piss. So his fee could be amortised across the 6 years

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

6 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

How do we lose money on the Isak sale?

We don't, obviously any sale price has to be offset against the remaining book value, but the OP clearly has a knackered calculator

[Checko]

Yeah there's about half Isak's fee left on his book value, so if we sell him, 32 odd million gets taken off the net profits for the sale.

[Gawalls]

2 minutes ago, Checko said:

Yeah there's about half Isak's fee left on his book value, so if we sell him, 32 odd million gets taken off the net profits for the sale.

Plus the reportedly sell on fee

[TheBrownBottle]

10 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

I don’t mean lose money I mean the first 44m + sell on fee is gone

Got you - Isak’s been here more than three seasons, so 60% of his fee is amortised, not 30%

[Checko]

Just now, Gawalls said:

Plus the reportedly sell on fee

If there's a sell on fee that would get taken off before working out the net profits, no?

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

Just now, Gawalls said:

Plus the reportedly sell on fee

Which is still only rumoured, also remember the £62M fee was also based on add ons, how many of these have been met?

 

also £32M isn’t £44M is it?

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Got you - Isak’s been here more than three seasons, so 60% of his fee is amortised, not 30%

Depends on if he club elected to amortise his fee over the full length of his contract or not, as the 5 year maximum came in the following year 

[The College Dropout]

He’s been here for 3 years pre-5 year amortisation max. 
 

he’ll have £30m left on the books. 

[Gawalls]

3 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

Which is still only rumoured, also remember the £62M fee was also based on add ons, how many of these have been met?

 

also £32M isn’t £44M is it?

Fair enough I was wrong on that but say sell on is correct and at 10% - all I was saying was to the posts saying “we’ll get these for 265 - isaks sale we may get them for £115”, that’s not going to happen. 

 

 

Edited July 24, 2025 by Gawalls

[The College Dropout]

1 minute ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

Depends on if he club elected to amortise his fee over the full length of his contract or not, as the 5 year maximum came in the following year 

The standard was over the length of the contract. So 6. 

[The College Dropout]

And sell ons are usually based on profit.  

[Ghandis Flip-Flop]

3 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

Fair enough I was wrong on that but say sell on is correct and at 10% - all I was saying was to the posts saying “we’ll get there for 265 - isaks sale we may get them for £115”, that’s not going to happen. 

Given the circumstances around this, I wouldn’t be surprised if some of that rumoured sell on clause will be passed onto whoever is buying, by way of a higher fee. I also imagine Alex's recent behaviour might see him lose out on loyalty bonuses etc too. So if indeed there is a sell on clause, which I certainly can’t remember being reported on at the time of his signing, the club will try and mitigate that as far as possible. There’s no way he goes for the £120M Liverpool might want, it’s time for them to put up or shut up

[Gawalls]

3 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

Given the circumstances around this, I wouldn’t be surprised if some of that rumoured sell on clause will be passed onto whoever is buying, by way of a higher fee. I also imagine Alex's recent behaviour might see him lose out on loyalty bonuses etc too. So if indeed there is a sell on clause, which I certainly can’t remember being reported on at the time of his signing, the club will try and mitigate that as far as possible. There’s no way he goes for the £120M Liverpool might want, it’s time for them to put up or shut up

I went looking a few hours ago and found stupid typical articles dating back start of the year on it - saying 10%  but just stupid online stuff.

 

 

Edited July 24, 2025 by Gawalls

[Shearergol]

Brentford determined to keep him. Is he training on his own yet?

[Ikon]

Still no breakthrough?? 

[KingArthur]

Just now, Shearergol said:

Brentford determined to keep him. Is he training on his own yet?

He is training by himself in London, iirc.