Hudson Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Right i'll do time and make these arse's sleep with the fish , just promise you will look after my family (mafia style) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 We lost £4.something million didn't we? When? The accounts which will cover the Carroll sale have not been published. It was in a statement announced a few weeks back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Like I said more profit means more expendable cash for transfers. How much profit was made last season? We spent something like 0.8 million net in the summer. Why not spend some of this expendable cash in the summer in the run up to a new season? We lost £4.something million didn't we? Operating profit. Very quiet on the number after player trading. So we're lumping the Carroll money in? As I said to Mick I think a striker will sign in January and the rest will be spread out over a few more years, did people think we would spend £35 million in one summer? I'd have taken 35 quid in one summer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Probably because we haven't made a profit without transfers yet, Mick. Unless you think Mike Ashley is 'trousering' it all? Profit is profit, no matter where it comes from and I wouldn't be surprised if Ashley has taken money out of the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Don't think we expected the Carroll money to be spread out over 3 or 4 years. Dread to think what our transfer spending would have been like if Liverpool didn't kindly hand us some funds. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/379842_2387430697723_1609490782_32305157_1886412988_n.jpg dear me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/379842_2387430697723_1609490782_32305157_1886412988_n.jpg dear me It is a pretty shit board like. Could have got a better one from Wilkinsons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/379842_2387430697723_1609490782_32305157_1886412988_n.jpg dear me Escapes his carers with such skill. Fair play to the lad. Starting to think that may be his real skin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/379842_2387430697723_1609490782_32305157_1886412988_n.jpg dear me :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 That lad seriously needs to sort his life out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 The most embarrassing cunt in the universe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 How did you get that from what I said? We'll sign a striker in January and the rest will be earmarked for spending over the next 2 or 3 summers. So we don't need £8 million. Depends if you want to spend more or not. Like I said more profit means more expendable cash for transfers. you're making an enormous assumption there, weak post even for you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 More profit for the club means more expendable cash for transfers, no? £35 million didn't do much of that. That's right because it was all going to be spent in the Summer! We'll sign a striker in January, probably Maiga and then the rest will be spread out over a few more years IMO. So if we hadn't sold Carroll we would have fuck all to spend? Pretty much. are you a geordie? And a season ticket holder, unlike yourself. More profit for the club means more expendable cash for transfers, no? £35 million didn't do much of that. That's right because it was all going to be spent in the Summer! We'll sign a striker in January, probably Maiga and then the rest will be spread out over a few more years IMO. So if we hadn't sold Carroll we would have fuck all to spend? Pretty much. are you a geordie? And a season ticket holder, unlike yourself. shocking then tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 19. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 So we're lumping the Carroll money in? As I said to Mick I think a striker will sign in January and the rest will be spread out over a few more years, did people think we would spend £35 million in one summer? Llambias is claiming that we need sponsorship to buy players, we dont. You've said yourself that we'll still be spending the Carroll money over the next couple of seasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 How did you get that from what I said? We'll sign a striker in January and the rest will be earmarked for spending over the next 2 or 3 summers. So we don't need £8 million. Depends if you want to spend more or not. Like I said more profit means more expendable cash for transfers. It doesn't in the Ashley philosophy like Doesn't it? On that philosophy, we'd have spent a canny bit in the Summer (I don't think we were operating with losses of £39m or whatever it was we made). I don't remember us making that much, unless we're not including what I presume are decent signing on fees to Ba and Marveaux, they also failed to get another striker they wanted that's now apparently set up for January. Like I said the money for Carroll will be used over a few years, not just one summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Don't see the point in revisiting the entire Ashley and transfer spending debate just because of the stadium naming. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 How did you get that from what I said? We'll sign a striker in January and the rest will be earmarked for spending over the next 2 or 3 summers. So we don't need £8 million. Depends if you want to spend more or not. Like I said more profit means more expendable cash for transfers. It doesn't in the Ashley philosophy like Doesn't it? On that philosophy, we'd have spent a canny bit in the Summer (I don't think we were operating with losses of £39m or whatever it was we made). I don't remember us making that much, unless we're not including what I presume are decent signing on fees to Ba and Marveaux, they also failed to get another striker they wanted that's now apparently set up for January. Like I said the money for Carroll will be used over a few years, not just one summer. are you using a magic 8 ball to tell us this? the wum spin is in over drive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/379842_2387430697723_1609490782_32305157_1886412988_n.jpg dear me Escapes his carers with such skill. Fair play to the lad. Starting to think that may be his real skin. Me to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Don't see the point in revisiting the entire Ashley and transfer spending debate just because of the stadium naming. Why not? It's so riveting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 How did you get that from what I said? We'll sign a striker in January and the rest will be earmarked for spending over the next 2 or 3 summers. So we don't need £8 million. Depends if you want to spend more or not. Like I said more profit means more expendable cash for transfers. It doesn't in the Ashley philosophy like Doesn't it? On that philosophy, we'd have spent a canny bit in the Summer (I don't think we were operating with losses of £39m or whatever it was we made). I don't remember us making that much, unless we're not including what I presume are decent signing on fees to Ba and Marveaux, they also failed to get another striker they wanted that's now apparently set up for January. Like I said the money for Carroll will be used over a few years, not just one summer. the wum spin is in over drive Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 It was in a statement announced a few weeks back. We didn't lose £4 million in the same financial year as we sold Carroll because Llambias was bragging that we were almost breaking even before the sale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 So we're lumping the Carroll money in? As I said to Mick I think a striker will sign in January and the rest will be spread out over a few more years, did people think we would spend £35 million in one summer? Llambias is claiming that we need sponsorship to buy players, we dont. You've said yourself that we'll still be spending the Carroll money over the next couple of seasons. Think you're reading too much into words there, Mick. He also included a striker in January in that but that doesn't mean we're going to spend money in advance of getting it, he's talking about building for the future and if we want to continue improving and keeping our better players we're going to have to bring in more money. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 Right i'll do time and make these arse's sleep with the fish , just promise you will look after my family (mafia style) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 How did you get that from what I said? We'll sign a striker in January and the rest will be earmarked for spending over the next 2 or 3 summers. So we don't need £8 million. Depends if you want to spend more or not. Like I said more profit means more expendable cash for transfers. It doesn't in the Ashley philosophy like Doesn't it? On that philosophy, we'd have spent a canny bit in the Summer (I don't think we were operating with losses of £39m or whatever it was we made). I don't remember us making that much, unless we're not including what I presume are decent signing on fees to Ba and Marveaux, they also failed to get another striker they wanted that's now apparently set up for January. Like I said the money for Carroll will be used over a few years, not just one summer. are you using a magic 8 ball to tell us this? the wum spin is in over drive It's my opinion, what's yours? That Ashley is 'trousering' the money? Despite the accounts showing he hasn't ever taken money out? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now